|
26.03.2009
Is the EU run by a madman?Speaking in the European Parliament, a mentally unbalanced Topalanek accuses Obama of going down the road to hell. The Czech EU presidency is now turning into the disaster we have always expected. A day after losing a vote of no confidence in his national parliament, the Czech premier took the stage at the European Parliament in Strasbourg to launch a diplomatically disastrous attack on US president Barrack Obama over his stimulus programme. He said the attempt to borrow trillions would pave the road to hell. (While conservative economists inside and outside the US may agree with that view, it is nevertheless a different matter for the acting president of the EU to make such a statement, as one would expect it to reflect official EU position, which it is not.) FT Deutschland said in its news story that the comments underline doubt the Czech EU presidency, which runs until June, could be successfully completed.
Wolfgang Proissl of FT Deutschland also produced a nice anecdote in a separate article. When Topolanek said the US had to finance its stimulus through the issue of bonds, a translation error produce the news headline that the US would finance its stimulus through the export of bombs. Flabberghasted Czech officials told everybody that he said “bonds, not bombs”.
Global trade shrinks 20% since October – Speed of decline greater than during Great Depression The best authority on real time global trade data is the Netherlands CPB Institute, which yesterday published its January trade data. Global trade are now down 20% since October. This is not annualised but actual. In other words, global trade volumes are down by a fifth compared to pre-crisis levels. FT Deutschland quotes a CPB staffer as saying this is faster than during the Great Depression (the estimates there range from 25-35% during 1929 and 1932).
This is only the beginning A new chief of the Economic and Financial Committee Thomas Wieser, state secretary in the Austrian finance minister is to be become the next head of the Economic and Financial Committee, the influential committee that prepares the eurogroup and Ecofin meetings of finance ministers. FT Deutschland has this story, and points out that it is unusually for a non-G7 representation to fulfil this role, but Germany’s Jorg Assmussen was considered as too inexperience to be entrusted with this role. Wieser replaces Xavier Muscat, who will return to Paris as Sarkozy’s economic adviser.
US New Home Sales Bankers are now talking about the green shoots of recovery because a few indicators have turned. When it comes to the US housing market, a critical element in the crisis, our favourite source Calculated Risk tells us that the February upturn in new home sales should not be exaggerated, nor confused with an upturn in prices. Also the upturn is so small that it is hardly visible on the chart – an eyetest as Calculated Risks puts it. Still the blogger expects new homes sales to bottom out this year, which suggest that prices could bottom out next year.
Here is the eyetest chart.
In defence of the Geithner plan Yesterday, we summerised four highly negative comments about the Geithner plan. For balance, we thought it appropriate to highlight a few of the positive comments.
Brad DeLong The most comprehensive defence of the plan comes from Brad DeLong. He makes the point companies cannot currently finance expansion because asset prices are excessively low due to higher risk and information discounts. The idea is to boost asset prices to the companies can expand once again. If the government buys up $1 trillion of financial assets, the private sector has to hold $1 trillion less of risky and information-impacted assets. He estimates that one would have to take $4 trillion out of the market to move asset prices to unfreeze credit markets. So the plan is not sufficient. “But the Fed is taking an additional $1 trillion of risky debt off the private sector's books and replacing it with cash through its program of quantitative easing. And there is the fiscal boost program. And there is a potential second-round stimulus in September. And there is still $200 billion more left in the TARP to be used in other ways.”
Nouriel Roubini Nouriel Roubini says he sees light at the end of the tunnel, except that he does not know whether it’s daylight, or the light of an oncoming train. But he was positive on the Geithner plan: He told the New York Times he liked that the government was finally stepping up to clear the toxic assets off the bank’s balance sheet and that private capital would come in to make a market for it. “Having five people bid on a toxic asset, rather than a clueless government, will ensure that the government doesn’t overpay… People say, ‘the government is putting in 95 cents on the dollar, so why not put 100,’ to do it all by itself. It’s because private-sector participants have the incentive to get the best price.”
Jeff Frankel, too, believes that the Geithner plan should be given a chance for similar reasons, as those of Roubini and DeLong. In the end, the argument boils down to the question how to judge the importance of the private sector component. Without it, the plan is similar to the TARP programmes, which most of these commentators have condemned as being ineffective.
Eurointelligence wishes to thank the Collegio Carlo Alberto for their support to help us maintain eurointelligence.com a free public service. |














