We use cookies to help improve and maintain our site. More information.
close
An expert group set up by the European Commission effectively buries the idea of a debt redemption fund and euro bills, saying there are advantages and disadvantages, and in any case, it would take a treaty change to do it;

    01.04.2014

    0

    Expert group buries debt redemption fund and eurobills

    The key conclusions of the expert groups set up by European Commission to report on a debt redemption fund and eurobills yesterday presented its key conclusions. The report was broadly positive, saying they would stabilise government debt markets, support monetary transmission mechanisms, and strengthen financial stability and financial integration. But the report also warned of offsetting economic risks and moral hazard, though it said this would critically depend on how such a scheme is structured. The group also raised a number of legal concerns. Without treaty change, a debt redemption fund would be a purely inter-governmental construction, and this would raise issues of democratic accountability. To set up joint issuance and joint and several liability, a treaty change would be necessary. The report remains overall neutral on the desirability of the scheme.

    So much for that. An expert group that raises lots of concerns and does not come to any conclusion is by far the most effective way to bury an issue. We conclude that the experts have done the job for which they were appointed.
    Show Comments Write a Comment
    To write a comment, please login first. Your can log in here: Login
    Hide Comments