We use cookies to help improve and maintain our site. More information.

June 28, 2017

Is gay marriage Merkel’s next refugee problem?

We wrote yesterday that Angela Merkel’s U-turn on gay marriage was significant, and yesterday it backfired, seemingly to her own surprise. By accepting the principle of a free vote on gay marriage, Merkel wanted to signal openness on the one issue where the CDU/CSU officially disagrees with every other party it might enter into a coalition with after the elections. Merkel wanted to prep the CDU for such a coalition. 

What Merkel didn’t foresee was that the SPD would say thank you, and table the legislation at the committee stage, where SPD, the Left Party and the Greens, have a majority. The final plenary vote is scheduled for Friday. There are currently three legislative proposals but they all agree to abolish clause 1353 of the German civil code, which explicitly prohibits gay marriage. The CDU grassroots are outraged, both at Merkel’s on-the-hoof style of politics, and at the SPD’s exploitation of it. It was part of the coalition agreement that this issue would not be touched, and the SPD had reluctantly accepted it - until now. Some conservative CDU members are talking about a breach of the coalition, but this is nonsense of course since Merkel herself triggered this entire development.

The newspapers noted, that once again, Merkel takes her big decisions all on her own, in this case in a talkshow. They compared this to her decision to open the borders to refugees two years ago. 

Commentators see this episode as a potential break for Martin Schulz. The SPD’s party congress on the weekend seemed to have stopped the fall in their poll ratings. Gerhard Schröder gave a rabble-rousing speech, so did Schulz. 

Yesterday, the party’s executive met. Sigmar Gabriel was in good form when he read a letter he had written to Merkel in 2015, advocating the principle of gay marriage. The clumsy way Merkel talked about the issue, in a talk show, also suggests that this was not really somethig she personally had strong feelings about. It was a tactical manoeuvre. Her overall tactics in this election seems to be to preempt any popular initiative by another party, by coming out in favour of that party’s programme points herself. The problem is that this now looks somewhat unprincipled and, since everybody knows this and talks about it, it may not work as well as intended. We also noted yesterday that German stand-up comedians are having a field day with this.

So is this a turning point for Schulz and the SPD? We would not predict that Schulz will get back to the dizzy levels at which he peaked in the polls - around 33%. But there is quite a bit of upward potential from the depth to which he sank. Any result above Peer Steinbruck’s 25% last time will be welcomed as a victory. So will any result that precludes a CDU/CSU/FDP coalition, which we think would be a disaster for the eurozone in particular. We think that Schulz may be able to clinch that. We think that a red-red-green majority is still possible, though unlikely. Even when the SPD peaked at over 30%, the three parties did not have a majority in most of the polls. 

This episode also shows Merkel at her weakest, an ill-thought-out tactical manoeuvre whose political impact she underestimates, and for which she has not secured enough backing within her own party. Differential turnout was the big factor playing in favour of Brexit in 2016, in favour of Labour in 2017, and also in favour of Merkel herself in the 2013 German elections. It could play a role in the opposite direction this time. Judging from the mood at last Sunday's SPD party congress, it appears that the SPD may at least manage to motivate its own supporters this time, while Merkel’s U-turn may induce some of her conservative voters to stay at home. 

Show Comments Write a Comment

This is the public section of the Eurointelligence Professional Briefing, which focuses on the geopolitical aspects of our news coverage. It appears daily at 2pm CET. The full briefing, which appears at 9am CET, is only available to subscribers. Please click here for a free trial, and here for the Eurointelligence home page.


Recent News

  • October 16, 2017
  • What‘s the deep meaning of the elections in Lower Saxony?
  • Can Brexit be revoked?
  • Macron's grand narrative
  • April 19, 2017
  • Shadows of money
  • Breppe Grillo vs Eurointelligence
  • October 20, 2016
  • No games please, we are Europeans
  • April 25, 2016
  • The death of the Grand Coalition
  • Insurrection against TTIP
  • Juppé to benefit from Macron hype
  • On optimal currency areas
  • Why the Artic region could be the next geopolitical troublespot
  • From a currency to a people
  • September 18, 2017
  • Why Germany cannot lead Europe, let alone the free world
  • Will Macron help to build up Mélenchon?
  • Boris' Coup
  • May 12, 2017
  • What to do with Germany’s tax windfall
  • How Macron counts on building a majority
  • Options for the eurozone
  • January 05, 2017
  • French Socialist primaries - old wine in new bottles
  • Le Pen's hard ecu
  • Will Tusk get a second mandate?
  • Themes of 2017
  • August 30, 2016
  • Brexit facts on the ground
  • Burkinis and Republican primaries
  • The SPD and TTIP
  • April 25, 2016
  • The death of the Grand Coalition
  • Insurrection against TTIP
  • Juppé to benefit from Macron hype
  • On optimal currency areas
  • Why the Artic region could be the next geopolitical troublespot
  • From a currency to a people
  • January 05, 2018
  • Catalonia's government by Skype
  • The case for EEA membership
  • December 06, 2017
  • Ireland in search of its own path in the EU
  • Who owns the eurozone?
  • Gabriel's big speech
  • November 20, 2017
  • Showdown over Northern Ireland
  • Castaner and his list confirmed
  • Gennimata to lead the new left alliance
  • Brexit‘s ultimate irony
  • November 02, 2017
  • The Impact of Brexit
  • German court of auditors questions diesel tax break
  • On trade and violence
  • October 19, 2017
  • Germany is softening up over Brexit
  • The French budget and the wealthy
  • Will Borut Pahor win re-election as Slovenian president?
  • October 05, 2017
  • May clings on
  • On German ECB conspiracies
  • Mélenchon's crusade against the EU flag
  • September 22, 2017
  • The last German polls
  • September 11, 2017
  • Turkey issues travel warning for visitors to Germany
  • How nasty is the AfD?
  • August 31, 2017
  • Where are the Républicains?
  • Poland unmoved by EU rule-of-law sanctions
  • May will stay through Brexit, and then fight the 2022 elections
  • August 21, 2017
  • Soft, getting softer
  • Tsipras' chances of a boost
  • On the fallacy of a middle-ground option for the eurozone
  • July 31, 2017
  • Russia sanctions bill becomes US law
  • Spain's Guardia Civil in the eye of the Catalan storm
  • A grand bargain between France and Germany
  • July 24, 2017
  • Macron's popularity falls amid more budget cuts
  • Orbán to support Polish government against EU
  • No exit from Brexit
  • July 17, 2017
  • What Tony Blair's Brexit confusion tells us
  • Schulz advocates compulsory investments
  • Italy’s government has effectively lost its majority
  • July 11, 2017
  • The political fallout of the G20 in Germany
  • July 06, 2017
  • On Merkel’s imperial overreach
  • When the opposition opposes to oppose
  • Everybody wants the medicines agency
  • July 03, 2017
  • Can Greece exit its programme without a credit line?
  • The softening Brexit
  • Macron's state of the nation address
  • June 30, 2017
  • Recurring Brexit myths
  • On EU citizen rights
  • On Brexodus
  • June 29, 2017
  • Europe’s next refugee crisis
  • The smell of hegemony
  • June 28, 2017
  • Is gay marriage Merkel’s next refugee problem?