We use cookies to help improve and maintain our site. More information.
close

September 01, 2017

Rutte deflates Dutch labour party like a hot air balloon

The crisis of the Dutch caretaker government precipitated by the demand by the labour party PvdA for higher education spending in the 2018 budget has blown over, and has resulted in putting the PvdA and its leader Lodewijk Asscher in their place. They are a junior partner in a caretaker government, their parliamentary strength was decimated at the March general election, and they don't get to dictate the budget of the new government, presumably composed of Mark Rutte's VVD, the Christian parties CDA and CU, and the left-liberal D66. Bert Wagendorp comments that Asscher deflated like a hot air balloon. All the PvdA got was an unspecified "guarantee" by Mark Rutte that there will be something for teachers in the new budget, which has now been submitted to the Council of State for its advisory opinion.

For the past couple of weeks, the Dutch press has been focusing more on the threat of a crisis in the caretaker government than on the talks to form a new cabinet reflecting the result of the March general election. Perhaps this is a sign that, after the leak of a draft agreement on medical ethics three weeks ago, the negotiating parties are enforcing the unwritten rule that there should be no leaks during negotiations. Or perhaps it is a sign that the negotiations are not progressing. The fact is that Rutte appeared to be busier negotiating to keep the PvdA in the caretaker Rutte II government than negotiating with his presumed partners for Rutte III. 

But there are some real issues that the negotiating parties will have to sort out if Rutte III is to be successful. NRC has an interesting piece about two former ministers in the Balkenende IV cabinet, from PvdA and CU, warning the parties not to leave the medical ethics issue open. The draft agreement that was leaked last month gave the parties freedom to pursue their policies from the parliament even if the government would not introduce legislation on assisted suicide. As difficult as it may be for CU and D66 to compromise, Rutte III may end up being short-lived if this issue is not addressed. Another pressing issue is environmental taxes. With the Green Left out of the government negotiations over its stance on immigration, the D66 is the only party with an interest in ramping up environmental taxes. The most the right-wing parties VVD and CDA will concede is that any new taxes be budget-neutral, that is compensated with tax cuts elsewhere, writes Volkskrant. The parties are considering some for of vehicle tax based on mileage and not a flat rate. Taxing vehicles differently depending on their fuel type is also a possibility, which will add to the debate on the relative merits of diesel and gasoline. And also, the Netherlands might remove the tax exemptions such as for aircraft fuel on international flights or for diesel in freight transport.

Show Comments Write a Comment

This is the public section of the Eurointelligence Professional Briefing, which focuses on the geopolitical aspects of our news coverage. It appears daily at 2pm CET. The full briefing, which appears at 9am CET, is only available to subscribers. Please click here for a free trial, and here for the Eurointelligence home page.

 

Recent News

  • May 12, 2017
  • What to do with Germany’s tax windfall
  • How Macron counts on building a majority
  • Options for the eurozone
  • January 05, 2017
  • French Socialist primaries - old wine in new bottles
  • Le Pen's hard ecu
  • Will Tusk get a second mandate?
  • Themes of 2017
  • August 30, 2016
  • Brexit facts on the ground
  • Burkinis and Republican primaries
  • The SPD and TTIP
  • April 25, 2016
  • The death of the Grand Coalition
  • Insurrection against TTIP
  • Juppé to benefit from Macron hype
  • On optimal currency areas
  • Why the Artic region could be the next geopolitical troublespot
  • From a currency to a people
  • January 05, 2018
  • Catalonia's government by Skype
  • The case for EEA membership
  • December 18, 2017
  • SPD regional party preemptively rejects grand coalition
  • Future of eurozone to be decided by March - we can hardly wait
  • December 04, 2017
  • Can Brexit still be stopped?
  • Could Poland open up the Posted Workers Directive again?
  • Has the Bank of England solved the productivity puzzle?
  • November 21, 2017
  • A short note on the impact of German political chaos on Brexit
  • A scandal, overshadowed
  • November 10, 2017
  • The Irish question intrudes
  • Beyond political parties
  • The European Commission - friend of the Glyphosate lobby
  • October 30, 2017
  • Italy's electoral reform seems to backfire already
  • Bregretometer hits another peak
  • October 19, 2017
  • Germany is softening up over Brexit
  • The French budget and the wealthy
  • Will Borut Pahor win re-election as Slovenian president?
  • October 10, 2017
  • The UK is slowly gearing up for a no-deal Brexit scenario
  • No liberal parties in Austria
  • October 02, 2017
  • Catalonia recalls EU and eurozone instability
  • French trade unions increase pressure over labour reforms
  • Watch out for a political accident in the UK
  • Municipal elections boost Portugal's Socialists
  • September 25, 2017
  • Where does this leave eurozone governance reform?
  • Is Mélenchon losing his momentum?
  • Lost in Florence
  • September 18, 2017
  • Why Germany cannot lead Europe, let alone the free world
  • Will Macron help to build up Mélenchon?
  • Boris' Coup
  • September 14, 2017
  • Bravo Mr Juncker
  • ... what he said about the labour market
  • ... and what his speech means for Brexit
  • September 11, 2017
  • Turkey issues travel warning for visitors to Germany
  • How nasty is the AfD?
  • September 06, 2017
  • On the failure of global policy coordination
  • The day Catalonia disobeyed?
  • Waiting for Varadkar
  • September 04, 2017
  • Dutch referendum: never again?
  • Why trade unions stay quiet on French labour reform