We use cookies to help improve and maintain our site. More information.
close

October 20, 2017

Why is everybody so nice to Mrs May?

By the standards of historic high noon occasions in European diplomacy, Brexit is a bit of a bore. No, there was no breakthrough last night, and yes, there is a real deadline for December for the first round of the Brexit talks. So we are going to have a classic build-up, and possibly another one of those very long EU summits in December. But the mood seems to have changed. The participants at the summit last night explained the mechanism by which they hope to reach that agreement. According to Laura Kuenssberg of the BBC, Theresa May told EU leaders that her Florence speech was not the last word on finances, while Angela Merkel also tried to strike a positive note, saying she had received no indication that the trade talks could not start in December. She also made a positive comment on the progress of the Brexit negotiations so far. This confirmed our story from yesterday that Germany's main concern is now to get on with a smooth Brexit outcome, but without caving in on the substance of the talks. 

We are also optimistic that a deal will be reached. It will still be difficult, as such deals always are. And it will be the first genuine political Brexit test after the referendum.

The BBC's Europe editor Katya Adler reported that EU leaders went out of their way to ensure that May would not go home empty-handed, agreeing on internal talks - to start on Monday - about the transition and trade deal ahead of the December meeting. This will allow the EU not only to agree a deal in December, but to start trade negotiations right away.

The British government, meanwhile, has found a common and much less offensive language about dealing with a no-deal scenario. Brexit secretary David Davis said that the government was preparing for no deal as an insurance option, but does not intend to pursue the option actively, according to the Times.

Show Comments Write a Comment

October 20, 2017

The haphazard Rutte III agreement

We have reported previously on the European policy section of the Rutte III government agreement. Bas Jacobs has a comment in De Correspondent about the domestic side of the agreement, in particular the fiscal policy. He writes that the budget policy is inconsistent in the sense that a centre-right government that preaches fiscal responsibility will end up increasing the budget deficit by some €10bn, or about 1% of GDP. There will be €1.4bn more spent on education, advertised as "teachers' salaries"; €1.5bn extra for defence; €1.6bn more in social security as a result of expanded child support; €600m on sustainable energy production; and €800m on development cooperation. In addition, taxes will be reduced by €6.4bn, though the lowest rate of VAT will increase from 6% to 9% to offset partially the cuts to personal income and corporate tax. He criticises the tax cuts as a missed opportunity to reform the tax system. He also notes that the commitment to structural reforms is weaker than in Rutte II. 

Jacobs writes that the four parties of the governing coalition strove tirelessly to reduce the public deficit during the crisis years, and are now increasing it when the economy is recovering. So, as elsewhere in Europe, the obsession with "sound" public finances leads to a pro-cyclical government balance. However, despite low unemployment and strong growth, Jacobs suggests that there might still be some slack in the economy. GDP is still about 10% below the pre-crisis trend, and there are 1.3m underemployed people, would like to work more hours. 

All in all, Jacobs cannot escape the impression that the Rutte III government agreement is a haphazard collection of measures that would have turned entirely differently had the coalition negotiations been conducted in a different order or at a different pace. 

Show Comments Write a Comment

October 20, 2017

Liberalism for the French left

Reinventing a national narrative does not happen overnight. It requires more than just a new vocabulary. Especially when it comes to the deeply engrained values of Liberté, égalité, fraternité.

Emmanuel Macron now looks to change the narrative for one of them. He wants to change the understanding of what equality means. The French are used to see equality in terms money, while at the same time accepting inequality of their status, says Zaki Laidi. Now Macron wants to change this and create equality in terms of chances. Inspired by John Rawls and Amartya Sen, Macron intends to bring these concepts into action. His wealth reform, housing benefits, and the proposal of small class sizes in educational priority zones, are all part of this approach, writes l’Opinion. But what is missing is his discourse about how his policies will bring about more social justice. Rawls and Sen might have conceptualised this, but to take it to the people is another thing. Don’t the people have to understand the intent behind Macron’s approach in order to participate and bring about the social justice he sets out to deliver? According to an Ifop poll earlier this week, about 56% of those polled don’t understand Macron’s policies. There is still a lot of convincing to do.

Show Comments Write a Comment

This is the public section of the Eurointelligence Professional Briefing, which focuses on the geopolitical aspects of our news coverage. It appears daily at 2pm CET. The full briefing, which appears at 9am CET, is only available to subscribers. Please click here for a free trial, and here for the Eurointelligence home page.

 

Recent News

  • September 18, 2017
  • Why Germany cannot lead Europe, let alone the free world
  • Will Macron help to build up Mélenchon?
  • Boris' Coup
  • January 05, 2017
  • French Socialist primaries - old wine in new bottles
  • Le Pen's hard ecu
  • Will Tusk get a second mandate?
  • Themes of 2017
  • April 25, 2016
  • The death of the Grand Coalition
  • Insurrection against TTIP
  • Juppé to benefit from Macron hype
  • On optimal currency areas
  • Why the Artic region could be the next geopolitical troublespot
  • From a currency to a people
  • February 12, 2018
  • What the euro debate is really about
  • How Brexit can still falter
  • July 06, 2017
  • On Merkel’s imperial overreach
  • When the opposition opposes to oppose
  • Everybody wants the medicines agency
  • November 29, 2016
  • On the politics of the Italian referendum
  • April 25, 2016
  • The death of the Grand Coalition
  • Insurrection against TTIP
  • Juppé to benefit from Macron hype
  • On optimal currency areas
  • Why the Artic region could be the next geopolitical troublespot
  • From a currency to a people
  • April 10, 2018
  • A mood of radicalisation in France
  • The German far right makes inroads into trade unions
  • On the absurdity of a new centrist party in British politics
  • October 12, 2017
  • Panicking in London
  • Gabriel's unbearable hypocrisy on the eurozone
  • April 15, 2017
  • Happy Easter
  • October 19, 2016
  • Walloons stand firm
  • Juppé and Macron - father and son?
  • J’ai vraiment dit ça?
  • April 25, 2016
  • The death of the Grand Coalition
  • Insurrection against TTIP
  • Juppé to benefit from Macron hype
  • On optimal currency areas
  • Why the Artic region could be the next geopolitical troublespot
  • From a currency to a people
  • May 28, 2018
  • A no-confidence motion that could backfire
  • The political repercussions of a historic referendum in Ireland
  • Why the lack of an international role for the euro matters
  • January 19, 2018
  • On the futility of discussing the German current account surplus
  • The Brexit revocation madness
  • Varadkar, the enfant terrible in the Brexit negotiations
  • September 14, 2017
  • Bravo Mr Juncker
  • ... what he said about the labour market
  • ... and what his speech means for Brexit
  • May 11, 2017
  • Germany rejects IMF’s policy recommendations before they are issued
  • Why Labour is losing
  • January 05, 2017
  • French Socialist primaries - old wine in new bottles
  • Le Pen's hard ecu
  • Will Tusk get a second mandate?
  • Themes of 2017
  • August 26, 2016
  • Will the refugee crisis return?
  • Montebourg en avant
  • Moisi on Sarkozy's chances
  • Binary choices
  • April 25, 2016
  • The death of the Grand Coalition
  • Insurrection against TTIP
  • Juppé to benefit from Macron hype
  • On optimal currency areas
  • Why the Artic region could be the next geopolitical troublespot
  • From a currency to a people
  • July 16, 2018
  • How to think about the three Brexit options
  • How to respond to Trump
  • June 25, 2018
  • Trump's car tariff to come early
  • On the lack of a sharp focus in the eurozone debate
  • June 04, 2018
  • German discourse out of control
  • Wait for European disunity on US tariffs
  • May 14, 2018
  • Catalonia: plus ça change...
  • Conveney says no to Brexit with border infrastructure
  • Why the noble Lords don't really matter
  • April 23, 2018
  • More bad news for the SPD
  • Will Theresa May accept a customs union? The Times says yes. We think so too.
  • A comeback for Marine Le Pen?
  • April 03, 2018
  • Is the time for Brexit revocation running out?
  • March 14, 2018
  • The geopolitics of trade war
  • A European labour authority
  • On Novichok
  • February 26, 2018
  • Angela Merkel's cabinet
  • February 12, 2018
  • What the euro debate is really about
  • How Brexit can still falter
  • January 29, 2018
  • Where is the opposition in France?
  • Scenarios and risks for Syriza over Macedonia
  • January 17, 2018
  • Labour smashes No Brexit dreams
  • A new political bargain in Portugal?
  • January 05, 2018
  • Catalonia's government by Skype
  • The case for EEA membership
  • December 15, 2017
  • Amendment 9 conundrum
  • The negligible GDP impact of the single market
  • December 06, 2017
  • Ireland in search of its own path in the EU
  • Who owns the eurozone?
  • Gabriel's big speech
  • November 27, 2017
  • Will Northern Ireland scupper a Brexit deal?
  • Last-ditch effort to prevent Irish elections
  • Pressure on Wauquiez
  • November 20, 2017
  • Showdown over Northern Ireland
  • Castaner and his list confirmed
  • Gennimata to lead the new left alliance
  • Brexit‘s ultimate irony
  • November 13, 2017
  • A pro-European list: Wauquiez' nightmare
  • Catalan separatism isn't going away
  • Why oh why does Germany behave the way it does?
  • Why the four freedoms matter
  • November 06, 2017
  • Pressures on EU rise over Catalonia
  • German pre-coalition talks hit glitch
  • If you thought UK politics couldn‘t get worse...
  • November 02, 2017
  • The Impact of Brexit
  • German court of auditors questions diesel tax break
  • On trade and violence
  • October 30, 2017
  • Italy's electoral reform seems to backfire already
  • Bregretometer hits another peak
  • October 25, 2017
  • How to think about a Brexit baseline scenario
  • Like the right, the left, too, is divided over Europe
  • October 23, 2017
  • Macron's plans for the European Parliament
  • First phase of Brexit negotiations in final stretch
  • Why the left hates Europe