We use cookies to help improve and maintain our site. More information.

November 14, 2017

The apolitical movement inside LREM

This coming Saturday, Christophe Castaner is to take the helm as the new leader of La République en Marche. He has a formidable task to turn a movement that was geared to bring renewal - and Emmanuel Macron into power - into a political party. The party congress the fault lines become apparent. We don’t expect any challenge in the leadership contest, as Castaner is the only candidate. But at this congress the members will also elect the executive board, the main governing body of the movement. Four lists will compete, and the top one will grab all the seats. And here the dividing lines are becoming apparent. There is the "Casta" list with political heavyweights like Richard Ferrand. And there are lists composed of civil society members from the movement. L’Opinion warns there is a revolutionary mood in their ranks. Civil society members will only vote for their own candidates, and look to promote their own sort of movement, "en marche citoyens". After five months in power, the link between Paris and the constituencies has weakened. There are many non-political local projects in the name of LREM out there in the field. There is also a movement fatigue: Among the 380.000 members of LREM about 120.000 are still active, though in all sorts of different committees and forms. Only 10% are still fully committed and en marche to transform the country. 

Will LREM succeed as a political movement? On everything they did the opposite to other parties. Get elected first, then turn into a party. There is no precedent here. The question is, now that Emmanuel Macron is president, can those anti-establishment forces be used towards building the backbone of a political party which already has a majority?

Until now the movement was without an ideological framework, which left a lot of space for power games, personal clashes, and haggling over jobs. In the constituencies, relations are particularly tense between LREM parliamentarians and the movement. Castaner is to sort out this cacophony and prepare the movement for the next task, the European elections in 2019. A formidable challenge indeed. 

Show Comments Write a Comment

November 14, 2017

On the unity of the PD and the visions of the Italian left

Massimo Franco has a comment about the state of the Partito Democratico, and its leader Matteo Renzi, who yesterday tried to lure the breakaway MdP into a possible coalition. The reaction by leading MdP politicians was a clear No. Personal relations with Renzi are simply too bad. Franco predicts that there will be no coalition before the elections, nor is there much chance of a reconciliation in the years to come. After Renzi managed to quell all internal opposition he is now in total control of the PD, so much so that "the PD is Renzi" as Franco put it. But this is also what makes agreement with the breakaway left impossible. His strategy is to build a coalition with the centrists and with Emma Bonino's party, to get about one third of the vote (we think this is optimistic), but this is a strategy that will land the PD and its allies in opposition. 

Show Comments Write a Comment

November 14, 2017

A clarification on glyphosate

The European Commission has asked us to point out an error in our coverage of the glyphosate story on Friday last week, which was based on an article of FAZ. In the case of glyphosate, the decision was not taken by the Council, but by the Standing Committee on Plants, Animals, Food and Feed. The comitology procedure applies in this case. 

Show Comments Write a Comment

November 14, 2017

On freedom of movement

Wolfgang Munchau's column in the Financial Times on Monday on the sanctity of the four freedoms has led to a number of interesting reactions including from Stefano Fassina, an Italian MP and former Italian deputy finance minister who left the Partito Democratico in protest against the policies of Matteo Renzi. Fassina put forward an argument we must confess we had not heard before: that it would be in the eurozone's interest to limit the four freedoms. We have heard this argument in respect of other EU countries like the UK, but not the eurozone. 

"[The four freedoms are] the reason why the EU and the eurozone, as the are now, are unsustainable. It's just mater of time. In 1957, the 4 principles were applied among countries not so different in terms of economic, social and institutional background. In a series of enlargements, the 4 freedoms, articulated in several directives, have been applied among countries in completely different social, economic and institutional conditions...The EU and, in particular, the eurozone were planned and made as the most extreme examples on earth of real neo-liberalism. The consequence has been an always deepening devaluation of labour, an always intensifying race to the bottom for wages and social conditions and always weakening domestic demand...The only way for the EU and the eurozone to survive is limiting largely and effectively the 4 freedoms within the EU and among the EU and the rest of the world."

We responded to him that it would be better to fix the eurozone's many shortcomings in a more constructive way, through a common safe asset and a common eurozone budget, but Fassina retorted that this was politically not realistic, and that it was easier to restrict the four freedoms.

On the same subject we found a beautifully argued piece by Deborah Orr in the Guardian. She is a Remainer, but deeply frustrated about the position taken by Remainers since the referendum, which is to patronise the Leavers. 

"Politicians do understand, on the whole, that the factor above all others that motivates white working-class Brexit voters is free movement, as again the Welsh survey attests. This is why Labour in particular is hamstrung. Backing remain would please its Guardian-reading supporters. But that would alienate many of its core voters. Whatever Jeremy Corbyn’s own views about the EU, the sensible strategy for the short-term is not to seem at all remain-oriented."

The only that could ever change the mind of the Brexiteers is genuine change.

"If progressives want to change the minds of Brexiteers, waiting for them to see the error of their ways isn’t going to work. What people need is a quid pro quo that offers them tangible improvements in their lives right now. That, and only that, will keep Britain in the EU."

Show Comments Write a Comment

This is the public section of the Eurointelligence Professional Briefing, which focuses on the geopolitical aspects of our news coverage. It appears daily at 2pm CET. The full briefing, which appears at 9am CET, is only available to subscribers. Please click here for a free trial, and here for the Eurointelligence home page.


Recent News

  • July 06, 2017
  • On Merkel’s imperial overreach
  • When the opposition opposes to oppose
  • Everybody wants the medicines agency
  • November 29, 2016
  • On the politics of the Italian referendum
  • April 25, 2016
  • The death of the Grand Coalition
  • Insurrection against TTIP
  • Juppé to benefit from Macron hype
  • On optimal currency areas
  • Why the Artic region could be the next geopolitical troublespot
  • From a currency to a people
  • April 10, 2018
  • A mood of radicalisation in France
  • The German far right makes inroads into trade unions
  • On the absurdity of a new centrist party in British politics
  • October 12, 2017
  • Panicking in London
  • Gabriel's unbearable hypocrisy on the eurozone
  • April 15, 2017
  • Happy Easter
  • October 19, 2016
  • Walloons stand firm
  • Juppé and Macron - father and son?
  • J’ai vraiment dit ça?
  • April 25, 2016
  • The death of the Grand Coalition
  • Insurrection against TTIP
  • Juppé to benefit from Macron hype
  • On optimal currency areas
  • Why the Artic region could be the next geopolitical troublespot
  • From a currency to a people
  • May 28, 2018
  • A no-confidence motion that could backfire
  • The political repercussions of a historic referendum in Ireland
  • Why the lack of an international role for the euro matters
  • January 19, 2018
  • On the futility of discussing the German current account surplus
  • The Brexit revocation madness
  • Varadkar, the enfant terrible in the Brexit negotiations
  • September 14, 2017
  • Bravo Mr Juncker
  • ... what he said about the labour market
  • ... and what his speech means for Brexit
  • May 11, 2017
  • Germany rejects IMF’s policy recommendations before they are issued
  • Why Labour is losing
  • January 05, 2017
  • French Socialist primaries - old wine in new bottles
  • Le Pen's hard ecu
  • Will Tusk get a second mandate?
  • Themes of 2017
  • August 26, 2016
  • Will the refugee crisis return?
  • Montebourg en avant
  • Moisi on Sarkozy's chances
  • Binary choices
  • April 25, 2016
  • The death of the Grand Coalition
  • Insurrection against TTIP
  • Juppé to benefit from Macron hype
  • On optimal currency areas
  • Why the Artic region could be the next geopolitical troublespot
  • From a currency to a people
  • July 09, 2018
  • German panic about Target2
  • AfD level with SPD
  • How the EU could fail
  • June 18, 2018
  • Some thoughts on the future of Europe
  • The end of Spanish income moderation?
  • May 30, 2018
  • Italian pro-Europeans repeat UK Remainers' error
  • Commission shakes up structural funds
  • Democracy lessons from the Irish referendum
  • May 11, 2018
  • Chère Angela, it is time to decide..
  • Those trade sanctions are really serious
  • Why Labour will not turn on Brexit
  • April 23, 2018
  • More bad news for the SPD
  • Will Theresa May accept a customs union? The Times says yes. We think so too.
  • A comeback for Marine Le Pen?
  • April 04, 2018
  • On the SPD’s U-turn on Russia
  • What if the UK had adopted the euro?
  • March 19, 2018
  • Waiting for Germany
  • Russia’s friends
  • Can the Commons force an extension of the Art 50 period?
  • March 05, 2018
  • One rock, two vetos, three governments
  • Rutte weighs in
  • February 19, 2018
  • SPD divided over grand coalition
  • Wauquiez - the French Trump?
  • Why Brexit will be extremely hard to reverse
  • February 06, 2018
  • Ciudadanos rising
  • Meet the rising star of Dutch populism
  • What to watch out for in British politics
  • January 25, 2018
  • About political leadership in the 20th century
  • Progress in name dispute talks and new opposition at home
  • About 40% probabilities
  • January 15, 2018
  • Is the section on Europe for real?
  • Can Drahos upset Zeman?
  • January 05, 2018
  • Catalonia's government by Skype
  • The case for EEA membership
  • December 19, 2017
  • German pre-coalition talks to conclude mid-January
  • Shall we talk about Brexit?
  • December 11, 2017
  • A new era for the French right
  • Growing scepticism of a grand coalition
  • December 04, 2017
  • Can Brexit still be stopped?
  • Could Poland open up the Posted Workers Directive again?
  • Has the Bank of England solved the productivity puzzle?
  • November 27, 2017
  • Will Northern Ireland scupper a Brexit deal?
  • Last-ditch effort to prevent Irish elections
  • Pressure on Wauquiez
  • November 23, 2017
  • ..the Greek government too
  • The eurozone's impossible fiscal trinity
  • Did Hammond do enough?
  • Berlusconi in Strasbourg
  • November 20, 2017
  • Showdown over Northern Ireland
  • Castaner and his list confirmed
  • Gennimata to lead the new left alliance
  • Brexit‘s ultimate irony
  • November 16, 2017
  • Germany's climate duplicity
  • Juppé open to join forces with Macron for EP elections
  • November 15, 2017
  • A Christmas bonus for poor Greeks
  • Dim prospects of negotiated de-escalation on Catalonia
  • Macron's favourite to succeed Juncker - first round
  • On sovereignty
  • Gli Azzurri