We use cookies to help improve and maintain our site. More information.
close

December 18, 2017

SPD regional party preemptively rejects grand coalition

It may not mean all that much that the SPD organisation in state of Thuringia has already, and preemptively, rejected the grand coalition. The talks haven't even started, there is no deal on the table and, who knows, Martin Schulz may pull off a few surprises in the upcoming talks.

But, as of now, we sense no support for a grand coalition and no shift in the overwhelmingly negative views of SPD members. Two senior SPD leaders spoke at the regional party congress: the deputy leader Thorsten Schä­fer-Güm­bel and Carsten Schneider, who represent the left and right wings of the party respectively, and who both support the official policy of seeking talks with the CDU/CSU.

One of the people who are pressing hard for a new grand coalition is Sigmar Gabriel, who hopes to secure the job of finance minister in such a construction. He writes in Der Spiegel that it does not matter for the survival of the SPD whether it is in government or not. This is a statement many SPD members, including Schulz, do not agree with. Gabriel is urging the party to shift to the right by embracing a nationalist concept - the notion of the innate superiority of German culture ("Leitkultur"), a notion once championed but later dropped by the CDU, and bitterly opposed by all the other parties in the Bundestag. 

It is astonishing to see the extremes people go to in order to keep their ministerial limousines.

Show Comments Write a Comment

December 18, 2017

Future of eurozone to be decided by March - we can hardly wait

It was a nice symbolic moment when Angela Merkel and Emmanuel Macron appeared in their first joint press conference after a European Council. They said they hope to reach agreement on eurozone reform by end-March. 

Wolfgang Munchau notes that there have been four substantive proposals on EU reform this year - by Macron, the German finance ministry, the European Commission, and Martin Schulz. Those of the Commission and Schulz are compatible with each other, but are rejected by a large majority of member states. The key element of the German finance ministry's proposal - the semi-automatic bail-in - is being rejected by France. In return, Germany will reject any notion of fiscal transfers or eurobonds. So we live in perfect gridlock on this issue. There is still room for formulaic compromises and Munchau expects that there will be some minimalist agreement, but none of that addresses any of the issues that need to be addressed - such as the separation of banks and their sovereigns, macroeconomic imbalances, or high youth unemployment. Munchau says that, on the development of banking union, Germany has not shifted policy. The policy has always been that a European deposit insurance scheme (EDIS) will only be acceptable after the banking system is cleaned of all its legacy debt. It makes no difference whether you say EDIS is acceptable after the conditions are met, or unacceptable until they are met. A solemn commitment to complete the banking union is thus meaningless. As we saw in Italy, the inter-dependence of the banks and the state has, if anything, increased since the start of the banking union. German officials are telling us that they see the banking union moving in the wrong direction. You can do the math on the third stage.

Show Comments Write a Comment

This is the public section of the Eurointelligence Professional Briefing, which focuses on the geopolitical aspects of our news coverage. It appears daily at 2pm CET. The full briefing, which appears at 9am CET, is only available to subscribers. Please click here for a free trial, and here for the Eurointelligence home page.

 

Recent News

  • September 14, 2017
  • Bravo Mr Juncker
  • ... what he said about the labour market
  • ... and what his speech means for Brexit
  • May 11, 2017
  • Germany rejects IMF’s policy recommendations before they are issued
  • Why Labour is losing
  • January 05, 2017
  • French Socialist primaries - old wine in new bottles
  • Le Pen's hard ecu
  • Will Tusk get a second mandate?
  • Themes of 2017
  • August 26, 2016
  • Will the refugee crisis return?
  • Montebourg en avant
  • Moisi on Sarkozy's chances
  • Binary choices
  • April 25, 2016
  • The death of the Grand Coalition
  • Insurrection against TTIP
  • Juppé to benefit from Macron hype
  • On optimal currency areas
  • Why the Artic region could be the next geopolitical troublespot
  • From a currency to a people
  • April 17, 2018
  • CDU's executive committees reaffirms eurosceptic position
  • Macron in Strasburg
  • April 03, 2018
  • Is the time for Brexit revocation running out?
  • March 20, 2018
  • The declining interest in macroeconomics
  • March 09, 2018
  • The Franco-German axis and its opponents
  • Auf Wiedersehen, Sigmar Gabriel!
  • February 26, 2018
  • Angela Merkel's cabinet
  • February 15, 2018
  • How will the EU finance itself after Brexit?
  • On the customs union
  • February 06, 2018
  • Ciudadanos rising
  • Meet the rising star of Dutch populism
  • What to watch out for in British politics
  • January 29, 2018
  • Where is the opposition in France?
  • Scenarios and risks for Syriza over Macedonia
  • January 22, 2018
  • Carles Puigdemont's flying circus
  • Macedonia and the insurrection of Greek patriotism
  • On the real hurdles for Brexit revocation
  • And the satellites, too
  • January 15, 2018
  • Is the section on Europe for real?
  • Can Drahos upset Zeman?
  • January 09, 2018
  • Where SPD and CDU/CSU differ on Europe
  • Weak and stable
  • The first rule of no-deal Brexit is you don't talk about no-deal Brexit
  • January 05, 2018
  • Catalonia's government by Skype
  • The case for EEA membership
  • December 21, 2017
  • Catalonia votes
  • A deputy prime minister resigns
  • Will Gibraltar result in another Irish fudge?
  • Blood, sweat and tears
  • December 19, 2017
  • German pre-coalition talks to conclude mid-January
  • Shall we talk about Brexit?