We use cookies to help improve and maintain our site. More information.

February 01, 2018

How Brexit can still go badly wrong

We were optimistic about the first stage of the Brexit negotiations, but not so optimistic about the second stage. We are now getting into the phase where differences among EU member states are beginning to surface, and where the EU is now trying out the old British trick of having your cake and eating it - with known results. Three stories in the UK newspapers this morning underline the acute difficulty. The UK does not want to guarantee citizenship rights during the transition. And the EU wants to keep control over the British tax system after Brexit, but it refuses a deal on financial services. There could be compromises on each of these points, especially on free movement, but we are alarmed to read that the EU wants a combination of a Canada trade deal on the one hand, and on the other hand tight controls of regulatory policy in the UK, including tax policy. Since this is so obviously unacceptable to the Brits - not only to the Tories - that this is going to be a real stumbling block, probably the biggest of all. 

The FT reports this morning that the EU reserves the right to impose sanctions against the UK if it were to undercut the EU's level of taxes or regulatory standard post-Brexit. These are unprecedented safeguards, as the article points out. The EU sees the UK as too big and too close to offer it a vanilla Canada-style trade agreement. In other words: the EU has its own definition of Canada-Plus. It wants a trade deal supplemented by clauses that essentially deprive the UK of any fiscal or regulatory autonomy post-Brexit, forever. The biggest issue seems to be corporate taxation, tax exemptions, and employment regulations. This is going to be a very tricky issue in the upcoming discussions, because it appears to be a red line for France in particular. Of all the issues out there, we see this one as a genuine stumbling block in the sense that it could frustrate an Article 50 agreement. 

This is especially so in the context of another FT story yesterday, according to which the EU rejects any separate trade deal for the financial sector. We are not surprised to read this, as we always warned that the UK would face a binary choice between a simple third party trade deal or customs union/single market (associate) membership. According to the article the EU decided that the appropriate framework for the financial sector after Brexit would be regulatory equivalence, but this only affects a small category of sub-sectors - banks are not included - and provides a highly uneven regulatory environment for the UK.

It is, of course, possible that the two sides agree a deal whereby the EU perseveres with an agreement that prevents dumping by the UK in exchange for a deal on financial services. But even such a compromise would be hard to accept for the UK, because it would undermine the whole idea of Brexit. If the UK were prevented from seeking out its own competitive niches after Brexit, the whole idea of Brexit would be rendered absurd. In this case, we expect to hear the argument gain ground that a hard, cliff-edge, Brexit might be preferable. We think that the chances of a hard Brexit are rising again.

Another potential source of conflict is the rights of EU citizens during the transition. The Guardian reports that Theresa May has ruled out freedom of movement during the transition, but we see the possibility of a compromise here. There will be discrimination between EU citizens in the UK who arrive before Brexit and after Brexit, in the sense that only those who arrive before Brexit will enjoy future guarantees of their status. Those who arrive later would enjoy total freedom of movement during the transition, but not necessarily beyond.

Show Comments Write a Comment

February 01, 2018

Two presidents - one elected, another challenged in first round

Two first rounds of presidential elections happened last Sunday, in Cyprus and in Finland. The incumbent in Cyrus failed to get over the 50% threshold and thus has to face a run-off vote next Sunday. In Finland, re-election was assured by a landslide win. Both elections focused on foreign policy issues.

In Finland, Sauli Niinistö won a whopping 62.6% of the votes. He is Finland's most popular president in more than three decades, appreciated for his tactical approach towards an increasingly assertive Russia. He fostered a good relationship with Putin and Finns see their president as a guarantor of national security and survival, according to political science professor Tapio Raunio. His private life also hit a soft spot with the Finns, as Niinisto is to become a father. His main rival, Pekka Haavisto of the Green party, won just 12% of the votes while other left candidates only got 1%-7% of the votes.  The comfortable win means that the 69-year-old politician avoided a second round of voting, a first since Finland introduced a two-round presidential election by popular vote in 1994.

Nikos Anastasiadis did not have such luck, and only received 35.5% of the votes. His contender for the second round will be the Communist-backed Stavros Malas, who received 30.25% of the votes. Last night the two battled it out in a second TV duel. A large part of the debate was about whether the Greek Cypriot side lost an opportunity to solve the Cyprus partition problem. Malas challenged Anastasiadis over the breakdown of the talks with Turkey while Anastasiadis blamed the Turkish government for the stalemate. The president often used a condescending tone to dismiss his opponent, or to rebuke the journalists who had to reminded him of the time limit. He defended his party's actions in government and the exit from the financial crisis, and presented himself as a steward of continuity and measured progress. Malos aims to tackle corruption and achieve a quicker settlement with Turkey.

Show Comments Write a Comment

This is the public section of the Eurointelligence Professional Briefing, which focuses on the geopolitical aspects of our news coverage. It appears daily at 2pm CET. The full briefing, which appears at 9am CET, is only available to subscribers. Please click here for a free trial, and here for the Eurointelligence home page.


Recent News

  • April 09, 2018
  • Orbán gets his supermajority
  • Riding the wave of resistance
  • The EU’s self-defeating strategy
  • October 09, 2017
  • UK is starting to prepare for a no-deal Brexit
  • Why Germany will resist meaningful eurozone reform
  • April 13, 2017
  • Did Russia influence the Brexit vote?
  • All good between Germany and the US now?
  • October 18, 2016
  • The self-destruction of Francois Hollande
  • Brexit psychotherapy
  • At least three candidates for the PvdA leadership
  • The unbelievable hypocrisy of Mario Monti
  • April 25, 2016
  • The death of the Grand Coalition
  • Insurrection against TTIP
  • Juppé to benefit from Macron hype
  • On optimal currency areas
  • Why the Artic region could be the next geopolitical troublespot
  • From a currency to a people
  • May 25, 2018
  • Rejected by US, Germany is turning towards China...
  • ...and France is turning to Russia
  • UK ties Galileo to security partnership
  • Germans are discovering miniBoTs
  • January 17, 2018
  • Labour smashes No Brexit dreams
  • A new political bargain in Portugal?
  • September 13, 2017
  • Why the Turkey negotiations will continue
  • May 10, 2017
  • PSOE primary campaign in full swing
  • Czech government crisis escalates
  • Backroom dealing on electoral reform in Italy
  • January 05, 2017
  • French Socialist primaries - old wine in new bottles
  • Le Pen's hard ecu
  • Will Tusk get a second mandate?
  • Themes of 2017
  • August 25, 2016
  • The costs of Brexit
  • Redefining corruption
  • Greek government shocked, shocked...
  • The costs of Brexit
  • Redefining corruption
  • Greek government shocked, shocked...
  • April 25, 2016
  • The death of the Grand Coalition
  • Insurrection against TTIP
  • Juppé to benefit from Macron hype
  • On optimal currency areas
  • Why the Artic region could be the next geopolitical troublespot
  • From a currency to a people
  • July 27, 2018
  • Be careful what you wish for - trade edition
  • A test of Pedro Sánchez' majority
  • July 09, 2018
  • German panic about Target2
  • AfD level with SPD
  • How the EU could fail
  • June 20, 2018
  • Does Macron support Merkel over refugees?
  • Arising doubts whether the meaningful vote rebellion will succeed
  • The message of two shocking polls
  • June 04, 2018
  • German discourse out of control
  • Wait for European disunity on US tariffs
  • May 21, 2018
  • Another snap election in the UK? Tories are preparing
  • Merkel and Putin - the beginning of a beautiful friendship?
  • May 08, 2018
  • Macron and the technocratic republic
  • Philippe's silent offer to the SNCF unions
  • On the ordoliberal utopia of a debt-free state
  • April 23, 2018
  • More bad news for the SPD
  • Will Theresa May accept a customs union? The Times says yes. We think so too.
  • A comeback for Marine Le Pen?
  • April 09, 2018
  • Orbán gets his supermajority
  • Riding the wave of resistance
  • The EU’s self-defeating strategy
  • March 29, 2018
  • Macron's fight against the Islamic Hydra
  • A small-country mindset in a trade war
  • March 19, 2018
  • Waiting for Germany
  • Russia’s friends
  • Can the Commons force an extension of the Art 50 period?
  • March 08, 2018
  • EU will not offer UK a financial services deal
  • What if the DUP implodes?
  • Has Mario Draghi expropriated German savers?
  • February 28, 2018
  • Watch out, the Brexit debate could take a nasty turn
  • Welcome back to the European Council, Silvio!
  • February 21, 2018
  • Whom do Wauquiez' indiscretions serve?
  • Latvian claims and counterclaims
  • Some observations about euro-ins and euro-outs
  • February 16, 2018
  • How big will the euro budget be?
  • February 12, 2018
  • What the euro debate is really about
  • How Brexit can still falter
  • February 07, 2018
  • A short note on bitcoin
  • February 05, 2018
  • How big is Germany's external surplus, really?
  • Macron's first election test
  • Coeure's endorsement of a fiscal union
  • February 02, 2018
  • Centeno cleared
  • How Brexit can go wrong
  • A short note on Five Star and the Lega
  • February 01, 2018
  • How Brexit can still go badly wrong
  • Two presidents - one elected, another challenged in first round