We use cookies to help improve and maintain our site. More information.
close

October 22, 2018

A week of intense political tension in the UK

In the last few days, the chances of a no-deal Brexit have risen significantly for two interlocking reasons. The Tories seem to be hell-bent to destroy Theresa May while refusing to back a withdrawal agreement. The FT reports this morning that there is heightened speculation that a leadership challenge could be triggered very soon, with Sir Graham Brady, chairman of the backbench 1922 committee, receiving the 48 required letters from MPs as early as this week. The next meeting of his committee is Wednesday. What is breathtaking is the brutality of the language eurosceptic MPs are using in off-the-record briefings to journalists - conjuring up images of lethal violence against the prime minister. While a leadership challenge is definitely on the cards as a possibility, we cannot as yet see a challenger getting the required majority votes among MPs. But the situation is extremely fluid. 

The second reason why we think a no-deal Brexit is becoming more likely is that Remainers are increasingly betting the house on a second referendum. We note with surprise that a great number of UK commentators take it for granted that the EU would give its unanimous approval to what would effectively amount to a one-year extension of the Art. 50 process. We saw for instance Philip Stephens in the Financial Times on Friday dismissing the obstacles with the remark that it is difficult to see how the EU could withhold consent.

We do not share such a view of the problem. As we see it, the EU will consider a prolongation as a matter of course only until the European elections or, to be precise, until the dissolution of the European Parliament in April next year. Beyond this, the EU might prolong but only if it received clear evidence that the UK was indeed about to change its position. We see no realistic prospect that the UK parliament would have even legislated a referendum before the European Council would take a vote.

In our view, UK would have to revoke Brexit first, and then hold a second referendum at leisure. In any case, re-entry is possible under Article 49.

We agree with Francois Heisbourg highlighting that the EU holds elections in May and has to negotiate a budget. Life goes on, he says. This view was also echoed with Jean-Claude Piris, who noted that the maximum possible time of an extension was only a few weeks.

We think it is a huge miscalculation among Remainers to set themselves up for a situation in which the EU will end up having to reject their request for a second referendum. If this goes on, this will turn into another back-stabbing myth. The political damage could be huge and lasting.

The reality continues to be that if the Remainers vote down Theresa May’s Brexit deal, say in January of February, the most likely outcome would then be a no-deal Brexit. May could trigger elections - the Labour Party would support it. But she would only do so if she had a chance to win them, which must be highly doubtful under such a scenario. Rather, she might calculate that by 2022, the economy will almost certainly have recovered from a one-off Brexit shock in 2019. 

Nor is it likely that May will shift gear. Kevin O'Rourke is right to dismiss the hope among hard Brexiteers that May can be pivoted towards a Canada-style deal. A Canada-deal is simply not available. 

Yesterday, May held a long telephone conference with her ministers, some of whom expressed concern about the idea of a prolonged transitional period or an open-ended backstop period. May, meanwhile, defended her position in the Sun, where she wrote that she would press ahead with her policies irrespective of the consequences to herself.

Would Labour really support a people’s vote after voting down a deal? Patrick Wintour (@patrickwintour) informs us that while well over half a million people demonstrated for a second referendum in London, Jeremy Corbyn flew to Geneva to discuss Chile, and various other Labour politicians were preparing for a march against fascism.  

All this means that it is not really hard to see how an accident can happen. If you really think that it is unlikely that the UK parliament will accept May’s withdrawal agreement, then what you are saying is that you are expecting a no-deal Brexit. The second is a logical consequence of the former - once you take into account the EU’s legal and political position, and the majorities in the UK. 

The only reason we are not betting on a no-deal outcome just yet is that the above-mentioned logic will in all likelihood become much clearer at the time of the vote. And the EU will make it clear that this will be a take-it-or-leave-it offer, just as Article 50 said it should be.

Show Comments Write a Comment

October 22, 2018

Poland's local elections reveal deeply-split country

All of us foreign onlookers fall prey to a distinctly lazy, virtually inescapable habit of equating a country and citizenry with its government. The trouble is that this tends to make the domestic opposition recede from our consciousness. It matters particularly when a country is culturally and politically divided into two almost equal camps. The other side is all too often forgotten when a country is considered to be one of the global breeding grounds for illiberal nationalistic democracy.

Poland is such a country as yesterday’s local elections have proved once again. According to exit polls, neither the nationalistic Law and Justice party (PiS), nor the centre-right Civic Platform, the main alliance of opposition parties, can plausibly claim a clear victory. The final tally is expected tomorrow or the day after. The Civic Platform did well in the big cities and, importantly, triumphed in Warsaw's high-profile contest. But it failed in its bid to expand its share beyond the quarter of the votes it received last time. The PiS scored around 32%, more than the 27% it received last time, but less than the share of almost 38% at the last national elections. The agrarian party came third with roughly 16%.

Unusually for local elections in a mid-sized country, the vote attracted substantial media coverage not just in Europe, but around the world. No less than the Atlantic Journal proclaimed the electoral face-off between the main candidates for the mayoralty in Warsaw to be a test case for global populism. Overall, yesterday’s outcome seems mixed enough to make it difficult to predict how Poles will vote in their upcoming electoral marathon: the European Parliament in May, the Polish parliament in the autumn, and the presidency in the summer of 2020.

It is of course always tricky in local elections to distinguish between the local and personal and the national factor; but the EU, in the guise of the European Court of Justice, certainly did everything it could to boost to the wider political significance of the poll. On Friday the ECJ issued an emergency injunction ordering the Polish government to suspend immediately and retroactively the law forcing judges - and notably those on the supreme court - into earlier retirement. The move is unprecedented, and we believe will be a watershed in the EU’s constitutional history. It is the first time that the ECJ has intervened in this urgent manner in a case of such constitutional relevance. We have already noted how the comparison with the constitutional history of the USA is always helpful when looking at the evolution of the EU. Any student of US history will understand that a federal supreme court interfering in the constitutional affairs of a constituent member of a union of states is a classic move on the road to a stronger federal power. The ECJ has issued famous landmark rulings shaping the evolution of the EU as an economic entity. The final ruling about the legality of Poland's judicial reform, and Poland's response to it, will be a decisive moment in the evolution of the EU as a political union governed by shared, and directly applicable, supranational norms.  

The government in Warsaw continued as in the past to respond with mixed signals, saying on the one hand that it would respect EU law – and therefore the ECJ’s injunction - while trying to get Poland’s supreme court to invalidate the ECJ's ruling. Its argument is that the Polish constitution supersedes the ECJ's treaty-based powers in this case. We note that this dispute is not specific to Poland: the conflict about the primacy - or not - of the national constitution over EU treaties has for instance been brought repeatedly before Germany’s supreme court. The judges in Karlsruhe judges have until now responded with deliberately ambiguous judgments, maintaining a prudent judicial truce, and evading a clear decision about its own possible subjection to the ECJ. Will the Polish judges risk a fundamental conflict their German peers have until now done everything to avoid? And, if yes, how will the EU respond? What is at stake here goes way beyond the preservation of fundamental norms in Poland.

Show Comments Write a Comment

This is the public section of the Eurointelligence Professional Briefing, which focuses on the geopolitical aspects of our news coverage. It appears daily at 2pm CET. The full briefing, which appears at 9am CET, is only available to subscribers. Please click here for a free trial, and here for the Eurointelligence home page.

 

Recent News

  • August 20, 2018
  • ... and a subtle shift in EU policies towards both Russia and Turkey
  • Nothing to celebrate about the end of the bailout programme
  • Support for Brexit holding up
  • November 09, 2017
  • From street protests to road closures
  • What Russia wants
  • January 31, 2017
  • Project fear against Italexit
  • On how not to frustrate Brexit
  • April 25, 2016
  • The death of the Grand Coalition
  • Insurrection against TTIP
  • Juppé to benefit from Macron hype
  • On optimal currency areas
  • Why the Artic region could be the next geopolitical troublespot
  • From a currency to a people
  • February 07, 2019
  • Forget Tusk - the real action is elsewhere
  • On David Malpass and the Trump legacy
  • May 28, 2018
  • A no-confidence motion that could backfire
  • The political repercussions of a historic referendum in Ireland
  • Why the lack of an international role for the euro matters
  • September 15, 2017
  • Juncker dragged into the Catalan fray
  • What to say in Florence
  • How to fill the gap left by the British MEPs
  • January 05, 2017
  • French Socialist primaries - old wine in new bottles
  • Le Pen's hard ecu
  • Will Tusk get a second mandate?
  • Themes of 2017
  • April 25, 2016
  • The death of the Grand Coalition
  • Insurrection against TTIP
  • Juppé to benefit from Macron hype
  • On optimal currency areas
  • Why the Artic region could be the next geopolitical troublespot
  • From a currency to a people
  • April 26, 2019
  • How Brexit has given rise to different perceptions of reality
  • The EP, not Madrid, will boost Spanish clout
  • How realistic is a Gaullist Europe?
  • September 17, 2018
  • About the new partnership between Russia and China
  • EU ponders Irish backstop protocol to help May
  • February 07, 2018
  • A short note on bitcoin
  • July 04, 2017
  • On the CDU’s programme
  • Macron defines his presidential style
  • Why do we criticise modern macro?
  • November 28, 2016
  • And now what Monsieur Fillion?
  • The inescapable logic of an interim agreement
  • On Germany's foreign policy post-Trump
  • How to lose against the populists
  • April 25, 2016
  • The death of the Grand Coalition
  • Insurrection against TTIP
  • Juppé to benefit from Macron hype
  • On optimal currency areas
  • Why the Artic region could be the next geopolitical troublespot
  • From a currency to a people
  • April 01, 2019
  • Meaningful IV
  • Caputová elected: a turning point for central Europe?
  • October 02, 2018
  • Whatever it takes - diesel version
  • Is Macron's European discourse too simplistic?
  • April 06, 2018
  • Schleswig Holstein collapses Spain's strategy against Catalan separatism
  • On the implausibility of conspiracy theories in the Skripal case
  • October 09, 2017
  • UK is starting to prepare for a no-deal Brexit
  • Why Germany will resist meaningful eurozone reform
  • April 12, 2017
  • Macro in a state of denial
  • Where Schulz is vulnerable
  • Schäuble’s three party tricks
  • October 17, 2016
  • Ceta is dead for now
  • L’après-Hollande, c'est Hollande
  • SPD against Russia sanctions
  • Nissan to join customs union and other fanciful tales
  • April 25, 2016
  • The death of the Grand Coalition
  • Insurrection against TTIP
  • Juppé to benefit from Macron hype
  • On optimal currency areas
  • Why the Artic region could be the next geopolitical troublespot
  • From a currency to a people
  • June 10, 2019
  • How to create Brexit facts
  • The new Alde is already in trouble
  • January 31, 2019
  • EU will play hardball until February 14, and stick to backstop beyond
  • French left and right moves ahead of EP elections
  • Tighten the belts as the economy prepares for landing
  • September 25, 2018
  • Be careful what you wish for - second referendum edition
  • May 21, 2018
  • Another snap election in the UK? Tories are preparing
  • Merkel and Putin - the beginning of a beautiful friendship?
  • January 15, 2018
  • Is the section on Europe for real?
  • Can Drahos upset Zeman?
  • September 11, 2017
  • Turkey issues travel warning for visitors to Germany
  • How nasty is the AfD?
  • May 08, 2017
  • A message of hope
  • Barnier's not so easily agreed Brexit principles
  • The rebirth of the paranoid conspiracy theory
  • January 05, 2017
  • French Socialist primaries - old wine in new bottles
  • Le Pen's hard ecu
  • Will Tusk get a second mandate?
  • Themes of 2017
  • August 23, 2016
  • Sarkozy launches candidacy in a book
  • Rajoy plans to try again in October
  • Turkey recalls ambassador from Austria
  • April 25, 2016
  • The death of the Grand Coalition
  • Insurrection against TTIP
  • Juppé to benefit from Macron hype
  • On optimal currency areas
  • Why the Artic region could be the next geopolitical troublespot
  • From a currency to a people
  • July 31, 2019
  • What Cummings' appointment says about Johnson
  • July 09, 2019
  • What the UK polls are telling us - and what not
  • June 18, 2019
  • Retaliation threats over drilling
  • May 27, 2019
  • The rising chances of a no-deal Brexit
  • May 07, 2019
  • … while Macron’s European troubles have already begun, and might get even worse
  • Don't discount a Brexit deal
  • Is Tsipras too complacent?
  • Costa - the fiscally responsible Socialist
  • April 15, 2019
  • Finland's far right changes the game
  • Brexit party drawing almost even with the Tories
  • March 29, 2019
  • Don't take Macron for granted
  • Green is EU's future - Loiseau takes a stance
  • March 13, 2019
  • Not really all that meaningful
  • Will the EPP merely put Orban on probation?
  • Why AKKs riposte to Macron is deeply disturbing
  • February 26, 2019
  • Corbyn frustrates second referendum by supporting it
  • What is going on in Theresa May's mind?
  • February 12, 2019
  • What the SPD's policy U-turn means for the future of the coalition
  • Will anti-Europeans unite the people?
  • How Tsipras turned EP elections into a two party race
  • January 29, 2019
  • What comes after plan B fails? Plan C, of course. C for cliff-edge
  • Gilets jaunes, how to structure a movement in free flow?
  • European Court of Auditors criticises Juncker’s investment fund
  • January 16, 2019
  • And now think about this standoff from the perspective of the EU
  • What can the French learn from Brexit?
  • January 04, 2019
  • Will the AfD become the Dexit party?
  • Romania's corruption problem in the spotlight of its EU presidency
  • December 14, 2018
  • Running down the clock
  • Macron, Philippe - untouchable no more
  • EP blasts Commission over Babis
  • December 05, 2018
  • Unilateral Brexit revocation is possible, but only until March 29
  • French government suspends diesel tax - too little, too late?
  • Schauble supports Merz
  • November 27, 2018
  • Responding to the yellow-vest protest
  • The New Hanseatic tensions are a foretaste of things to come
  • November 19, 2018
  • May’s pushback is kicking in
  • November 12, 2018
  • Does Macron really believe in his own 2019 battle plan?
  • A throwaway commentary about a throwaway comment
  • November 05, 2018
  • Macron trails behind Le Pen in European elections poll
  • How the CDU will organise leadership campaign
  • October 29, 2018
  • Why the EEA is no longer a Brexit option
  • Behold the rising superpower: post-catholic Ireland’s European miracle
  • October 26, 2018
  • Towards Fine Gael II minority government
  • EP votes for Saudi arms embargo, but who cares?
  • It's not easy being green - French edition
  • October 24, 2018
  • Can the eurozone be governed without a parliament?
  • EU to grant UK-wide backstop
  • Merkel flip-flops on diesel legislation
  • October 23, 2018
  • May hardens position on Irish backstop under pressure from cabinet
  • Greek pension cuts - a classic European dilemma