We use cookies to help improve and maintain our site. More information.
close

January 23, 2019

The importance of the Aachen Treaty

There are many ways to look at the Aachen Treaty, signed by Angela Merkel and Emmanuel Macron yesterday. The Economist dismissed it as a museum piece, an unnecessary and counterproductive move in a EU in which France and Germany should give up on their ambition to be the engine or, as critics would say, the directoire of European integration. The German media tended to emphasise the united front Berlin and Paris were putting up against populism. On the whole the treaty was welcomed as a validation of the continuing importance of the bilateral relationship for both countries.

Georg Blume writes that it was the obvious ease of the relationship between the two leaders that was most impressive, rather than the symbolism of the ceremony or the treaty's content, with its numerous provisions and declarations of intent ranging from defence, economics, education and border regions.

French commentary was on the whole even more critical. The strong symbolism of the Aachen Treaty is in stark contrast to its weak content, writes Dominique Seux in Les Échos. It is only a pale shadow of what Emmanuel Macron evoked in his speech at the Sorbonne thirteen months ago. Then Macron raised the bar high to force Berlin to agree on an objective for Europe over the next decade - but Germany failed to respond as it had other problems to deal with. The result, he writes, is a treaty with hardly any reference to the eurozone in the text. In that sense it sounds more like the end of an era rather than the beginning of a new one, so Seux.

And how to counteract the avalanche of fake news the Aachen treaty provoked on the far right? The French government chose to publish a communique rejecting each of the fictional claims with a capitalised NON and countering the claims with another capitalised LA VÉRITÉ (the truth). Commentators wondered whether this was a wise move. It is certainly not one without risks, warns Cécile Cornudet. In an angry post-truth world such as ours, such a brutally worded response to brutally wrong claims could backfire. And, by highlighting the claims in this fashion, it pushes the fake news right into the electoral campaign for the European elections.

We believe that the best way to look at the treaty was the one suggested in Aachen by Merkel herself. Just like its landmark predecessor of 1963, the Aachen Treaty is a tool. To what extent it will be used, and become an effective instrument for bilateral Franco-German and future EU policy, will depend entirely on the future governments in charge in each country. As long as the joint influence of France and Germany outweighs any impact either country could exert individually in Europe, the relationship will continue to prevail.

Show Comments Write a Comment

January 23, 2019

The demise of small Greek parties over Macedonia

The Prespes agreement on the Macedonia name deal is on track to be adopted in a plenary session of the Greek parliament tomorrow. Historic as this treaty is, it caused a deep divide among Greeks and destroyed several small parties along the way, writes Macropolis

The latest victim is To Potami. Two of their MPs are against the deal and - much to the surprise of the other three - decided to leave the party, de facto ending To Potami as a parliamentary group. Kinal, the alliance of parties of the centre-left, is in trouble too. The hard stance against the Macedonia deal by its leader Fofi Gennimata has led to the departure of one of its parties, Dimar. Also, former Pasok leader George Papandreou seems to disagree with Gennimata on this issue, and could yield another blow to Kinal. On the far right, Anel is another victim of the divide. Its leader Panos Kammenos is fighting for his party's political survival after the deal split the party and reduced its MP count down to five.

Syriza is set to benefit from this demise of the small parties in the upcoming elections and beyond. If voters see the elections as a contest between the two largest parties, Syriza and New Democracy, both will be likely to harvest some of the votes from To Potami, Kinal and Anel. Also, with the demise of two centre-left parties, Syriza will have no trouble claiming to be a harbour for the centre-left of the political spectrum, even if New Democracy were to win the elections.

Show Comments Write a Comment

January 23, 2019

A speed limit on autobahns - what is the world coming coming to?

The noose is tightening. Don't hold your breath - a change in the speed limit on German autobahns is still a long way off - but the debate is shifting. A government commission on the future of mobility has put the speed limit on the agenda, to the annoyance of the industry and of the transport minister, from the CSU. In the German government, transport ministers traditionally defend the industry's interest.

The lack of a speed limit won't fall easily, but we have no doubt that it will fall eventually as Germany is on course for a massive overshoot of its 2030 climate goals. The Greens are prioritising this now. We liked the comparison by Cem Ozdemir, the Green politician who heads the Bundestag's transport committee, between the German obsession with speed and the US obsessions with guns. He is also right when he says that he does not expect the Greens' position on this issue to prevail in the short term. We see parallels with the debate on nuclear power. The Greens prevailed eventually, but it took some time. The German auto lobby, and its many defenders in the media and consumer groups, are still in the driving seat so to speak. 

But consider the changing environment. The German car industry is facing multiple problems - diesel scandals, the dramatic fall in diesel sales, higher fuel taxes, a shift in consumer preference to smaller cars, and technological shifts that favour China and the US. A speed limit is probably not the most important challenge. But its significance is symbolic. 

In our own conversations in Germany, we note a sense of widespread denial not only about the environmental impact of cars, but also on the commercial and industrial consequences of the challenges posed by electric engines and artificial intelligence. A common defence of the status quo that we hear often is the backward-looking assertion that the carbon footprint of an electric car is higher than that of a diesel car. This is true for now, but it is shifting fast.

Show Comments Write a Comment

This is the public section of the Eurointelligence Professional Briefing, which focuses on the geopolitical aspects of our news coverage. It appears daily at 2pm CET. The full briefing, which appears at 9am CET, is only available to subscribers. Please click here for a free trial, and here for the Eurointelligence home page.

 

Recent News

  • October 01, 2018
  • After the referendum, more turmoil in Macedonia
  • What will happen if the UK parliament votes No?
  • Barnier's no-thanks works much better than a yes-please
  • April 03, 2018
  • Is the time for Brexit revocation running out?
  • October 04, 2017
  • On why Theresa May is likely to survive
  • On how to resolve the Brexit talks
  • Social housing - not a good start for the French government
  • April 11, 2017
  • What to expect, and not expect from Schulz
  • The view from Berlin
  • The view from Moscow
  • October 17, 2016
  • Ceta is dead for now
  • L’après-Hollande, c'est Hollande
  • SPD against Russia sanctions
  • Nissan to join customs union and other fanciful tales
  • April 25, 2016
  • The death of the Grand Coalition
  • Insurrection against TTIP
  • Juppé to benefit from Macron hype
  • On optimal currency areas
  • Why the Artic region could be the next geopolitical troublespot
  • From a currency to a people
  • May 27, 2019
  • The rising chances of a no-deal Brexit
  • January 18, 2019
  • Why Dublin won't yield on the backstop
  • Town hall debates vs street protests - who is winning?
  • September 13, 2018
  • Bravo Mr Juncker for raising the issue of the euro’s international role. But what now?
  • Are the eurosceptics imploding?
  • May 10, 2018
  • Time for some clear thinking on Trump and Iran
  • Will Corbyn accept the EEA? Brexiteers can relax. He won't.
  • What next for the DUP?
  • January 05, 2018
  • Catalonia's government by Skype
  • The case for EEA membership
  • August 24, 2017
  • Legislative hyperactivity for Tsipras' new narrative
  • On the deep causes of euroscepticism
  • April 23, 2017
  • The demise of the AfD has accelerated dramatically
  • On how France will need to confront Germany
  • December 21, 2016
  • A culture of denial
  • Ukraine agreement hangs in the balance
  • Valls U-turn on 49-3
  • Beware of exotic Brexit options
  • August 22, 2016
  • Gold for Brexit
  • EU and Turkey talking past each other
  • Switzerland is the next migrant transit country
  • On the death of neoliberal economics
  • April 25, 2016
  • The death of the Grand Coalition
  • Insurrection against TTIP
  • Juppé to benefit from Macron hype
  • On optimal currency areas
  • Why the Artic region could be the next geopolitical troublespot
  • From a currency to a people
  • July 30, 2019
  • Forex shifts are object lesson in costs of complacent analysis
  • July 11, 2019
  • Focus on election timetable, not prorogation...
  • ...and not on Darroch either
  • June 24, 2019
  • Economic reform has torn up the SPD - climate policy does the same for the CDU/CSU
  • Not intruding, not really
  • June 06, 2019
  • Is this the end of traditional parties as we know them?
  • How a no-deal Brexit could happen
  • May 22, 2019
  • Better start those no-deal preparations right now
  • Europe's real transfer union is from east to west
  • May 08, 2019
  • How to think about Italy's fiscal position in 2020
  • Anti-Immigration rhetoric unites EP's future new far-right group
  • Not looking like a European century
  • April 24, 2019
  • May's final and biggest gamble
  • Will the EP be Brexit's great parliamentary beneficiary?
  • Can Loiseau fight the far right given her past?
  • April 05, 2019
  • Salvini's attempt to unite the European right
  • Scandal engulfs Romania's EU presidency
  • Chinese ambitions meet Greek bureaucracies
  • March 25, 2019
  • An object lesson in realpolitik
  • On the probability of a no-deal Brexit
  • March 15, 2019
  • The rising significance of the European elections for Brexit
  • Orbán apologises, but only for channeling Lenin
  • Who is afraid of Marine Le Pen?
  • March 06, 2019
  • Weber toughens his stance against Orbán
  • The European loneliness of Emmanuel Macron
  • You really should not take EU's willingness to extend for granted
  • February 25, 2019
  • Deal versus short delay
  • The astonishing weakness of Five Star
  • The real threat is from the left not the right
  • February 18, 2019
  • How the splits on the left and the right will affect Brexit
  • February 11, 2019
  • SPD dumps Hartz IV
  • Macron's revival
  • February 04, 2019
  • Watch out for the resurgence in Tory unity
  • The gilets-jaunes' effect on the European elections
  • What did he possibly mean by that?
  • January 31, 2019
  • EU will play hardball until February 14, and stick to backstop beyond
  • French left and right moves ahead of EP elections
  • Tighten the belts as the economy prepares for landing
  • January 28, 2019
  • Battle of the amendments
  • How the Prespes deal affects the next Greek elections
  • January 25, 2019
  • Is this the beginning of the end of the gilets jaunes?
  • Kurz speculates about longer Brexit delay
  • January 24, 2019
  • A gilets-jaunes list for the European elections?
  • Let's take "off-the-table" off the table
  • Why Italy's centrist parties gain no traction