We use cookies to help improve and maintain our site. More information.

February 05, 2019

Pressure on Varadkar rises - the EP turns up the heat

Let's consider the worst-case scenario for a moment: without a backstop Ireland would be legally bound to start moving towards a hard border on the day of Brexit: reinventing the impossibly intricate, 500km-long, now invisible border as one with more than just a few police and customs checks. Since this would clearly destroy key benefits of the Good Friday agreement, Dublin is reluctant even to contemplate such a scenario, let alone debate it openly. The Brexit steering group in the European  parliament did exactly that, much to the irritation of the Irish government. Dublin's position is that, according to the 1998 peace agreement, it is up to the British to ensure that the border can remain open and it is therefore up to Brexiting London and not Remaining Dublin to come up with a solution.

For the European parliament and its Brexit steering group there is a further consideration, namely that the integrity of the single market must be assured no matter what happens to the Good Friday agreement. Spiegel Online quotes veteran MEP Elmar Brok with a stark warning that an open border plus Brexit could mean that cheap chlorinated chicken à l'américaine would infest the shelves of EU supermarkets, a scary image not just for German voters. Philippe Lamberts, another prominent member of the committee, warned that if the Irish were to refuse to patrol and control the 500km-long border the EU might have to consider installing the border checks on the continent. This would de facto exclude Ireland from the customs union, so it is up to the Irish to chose between an open un-patrolled border and the single market, so Lamberts. 

With such tough love, if love it is, the pressure on Ireland to open itself up to an alternative to the current backstop formula is rising. Expect more heat between now and and March. But, after all, spring is coming.  

Show Comments Write a Comment

February 05, 2019

When grounds shift - literally

For the past twelve years since we started Eurointelligence the main issues that drove Europe's political economy have been financial crises and their political and economic consequences. Looking forward, we still see most of these issues unresolved, but likely to be superseded by even bigger issues. The biggest worries for the EU and the eurozone will probably not be the big macro crises of the past, but technological and environmental shifts of unprecedented scale. 

One is the geopolitics of technology. On this point, we noted a comment by Niall Ferguson in his Sunday Times column that the big issue that defines bilateral relations between the US and China is no longer trade, but technology. The arrest of Huawei's finance director and the fears of China's domination of 5G networks matter more than mere trade tariffs. Even Germany has been getting more defensive on technology transfers, but beyond competition policy the EU is ill-equipped for this struggle. The designs of China's New Silk Road initiative already reach deep into the EU, and are likely to turn into a source of political and economic tensions on our continent. 

The second and probably even more important development relates to climate change. We noted a disturbing report in the Guardian on what one expert called the climate crisis you have not heard of: melting glaciers in the Hindu Kush and the Himalaya ranges, with the potential for a mass dislocation of some 2bn people. Those glaciers constitute a water reservoir for much of central Asia reaching deep into China, which is dependent for its water supplies from rivers that flows from those mountains. The impact of the melting is catastrophic - floods, monsoon rains, and insufficient water pressure for the hydro-electric dams that provide much of China's energy supply.  

A massive report just published on this issues notes that, even if global warming were limited to a rise in average temperatures by 1.5 degrees celsius, 36% of the glaciers will have disappeared by the end of the decade. If temperatures go up by 2 degrees, that percentage rises to two thirds. It it is not hard to see that these foreseeable catastrophes could lead to mass migration and even war on the Eurasian continent this century. The geological effects will start kicking in by in the middle of the century (which is only 30 years away), but the political effects are likely to hit much earlier, as those dramatic changes are being anticipated.

Show Comments Write a Comment

This is the public section of the Eurointelligence Professional Briefing, which focuses on the geopolitical aspects of our news coverage. It appears daily at 2pm CET. The full briefing, which appears at 9am CET, is only available to subscribers. Please click here for a free trial, and here for the Eurointelligence home page.


Recent News

  • October 01, 2018
  • After the referendum, more turmoil in Macedonia
  • What will happen if the UK parliament votes No?
  • Barnier's no-thanks works much better than a yes-please
  • April 03, 2018
  • Is the time for Brexit revocation running out?
  • October 04, 2017
  • On why Theresa May is likely to survive
  • On how to resolve the Brexit talks
  • Social housing - not a good start for the French government
  • April 11, 2017
  • What to expect, and not expect from Schulz
  • The view from Berlin
  • The view from Moscow
  • October 17, 2016
  • Ceta is dead for now
  • L’après-Hollande, c'est Hollande
  • SPD against Russia sanctions
  • Nissan to join customs union and other fanciful tales
  • April 25, 2016
  • The death of the Grand Coalition
  • Insurrection against TTIP
  • Juppé to benefit from Macron hype
  • On optimal currency areas
  • Why the Artic region could be the next geopolitical troublespot
  • From a currency to a people
  • May 27, 2019
  • The rising chances of a no-deal Brexit
  • January 18, 2019
  • Why Dublin won't yield on the backstop
  • Town hall debates vs street protests - who is winning?
  • September 13, 2018
  • Bravo Mr Juncker for raising the issue of the euro’s international role. But what now?
  • Are the eurosceptics imploding?
  • May 10, 2018
  • Time for some clear thinking on Trump and Iran
  • Will Corbyn accept the EEA? Brexiteers can relax. He won't.
  • What next for the DUP?
  • January 05, 2018
  • Catalonia's government by Skype
  • The case for EEA membership
  • August 24, 2017
  • Legislative hyperactivity for Tsipras' new narrative
  • On the deep causes of euroscepticism
  • April 23, 2017
  • The demise of the AfD has accelerated dramatically
  • On how France will need to confront Germany
  • December 21, 2016
  • A culture of denial
  • Ukraine agreement hangs in the balance
  • Valls U-turn on 49-3
  • Beware of exotic Brexit options
  • August 22, 2016
  • Gold for Brexit
  • EU and Turkey talking past each other
  • Switzerland is the next migrant transit country
  • On the death of neoliberal economics
  • April 25, 2016
  • The death of the Grand Coalition
  • Insurrection against TTIP
  • Juppé to benefit from Macron hype
  • On optimal currency areas
  • Why the Artic region could be the next geopolitical troublespot
  • From a currency to a people
  • July 29, 2019
  • No-deal Brexit is no longer just a scenario
  • No German warships to the Strait of Hormuz
  • July 11, 2019
  • Focus on election timetable, not prorogation...
  • ...and not on Darroch either
  • June 24, 2019
  • Economic reform has torn up the SPD - climate policy does the same for the CDU/CSU
  • Not intruding, not really
  • June 06, 2019
  • Is this the end of traditional parties as we know them?
  • How a no-deal Brexit could happen
  • May 22, 2019
  • Better start those no-deal preparations right now
  • Europe's real transfer union is from east to west
  • May 07, 2019
  • … while Macron’s European troubles have already begun, and might get even worse
  • Don't discount a Brexit deal
  • Is Tsipras too complacent?
  • Costa - the fiscally responsible Socialist
  • April 24, 2019
  • May's final and biggest gamble
  • Will the EP be Brexit's great parliamentary beneficiary?
  • Can Loiseau fight the far right given her past?
  • April 09, 2019
  • What can go wrong now?
  • March 29, 2019
  • Don't take Macron for granted
  • Green is EU's future - Loiseau takes a stance
  • March 20, 2019
  • EU is hardening position on long delay
  • Trump's man in Berlin is wrong on form, but right on substance
  • March 11, 2019
  • Ask what Europe can do for Germany - AKK's EU manifesto
  • March 04, 2019
  • Macron's two-month sprint
  • May's numbers are not there yet
  • Greening QE
  • On the "hope" of a rate raise
  • February 25, 2019
  • Deal versus short delay
  • The astonishing weakness of Five Star
  • The real threat is from the left not the right
  • February 19, 2019
  • Neither seven dwarfs, nor the magnificent seven. Merely a sad day for Labour
  • Will Costa last through the stand-off with the unions?
  • February 15, 2019
  • Syriza suffers defeat in constitutional reform
  • A cautionary tale about experts
  • February 11, 2019
  • SPD dumps Hartz IV
  • Macron's revival
  • February 07, 2019
  • Forget Tusk - the real action is elsewhere
  • On David Malpass and the Trump legacy
  • February 06, 2019
  • Gilets jaunes: anti-government but business-friendly
  • May has reasonable chances of success