We use cookies to help improve and maintain our site. More information.

February 13, 2019

What to make of the man in the pub - and other tales

When you try to make sense of uncertain events - as we do here - there are two different approaches. One is journalistic. You report what officials are saying to you, what politicians promise, or for that matter what you are hearing in the pub. This is the realm of daily journalism, but we find this method not very useful for our line of work because it generates too much noise. Just look at the sudden rise in predictions of a no-deal Brexit or the recurring reports on Theresa May's immediate political demise.

The alternative, our approach, is based on an analysis of incentives and of revealed preference - what people did in the past carries more weight than what they promise to do in the future. This is not an exact science, but we find following this approach gives more consistent results over time. It also means that, from time to time, our analysis is at odds with the conventional wisdom. 

Yesterday's news developments are a perfect example of how the two approaches can lead to different conclusions. Are we paying attention to what Olly Robbins, Theresa May's most important Brexit adviser and chief negotiator, was overheard telling colleagues in a pub? Do we conclude, like the Guardian this morning, that Robbins gave the game away by framing the final Brexit choice as one between deal or a long delay - 21 months as the ITV anchorman put it? This would imply a choice between deal and no Brexit, as opposed to deal versus no deal. Such a long delay, without any concrete alternative plan of action, would be seen by many as an indirect way of revoking Brexit. We cannot see how this squares with May's strategic goals. It would politically be more catastrophic for her than signing up to Jeremy Corbyn's version of Brexit. It does not make sense to us.

Alternatively, we could pay more attention to another story. The journalist Nick Gutteridge writes that the stated aim by the UK to change the withdrawal treaty is mere smoke and mirrors, designed to get to the end of March. The EU will, of course, not re-open the treaty. But behind closed doors officials are discussing possible procedural changes to introduce a review mechanism, what one official was described as calling a "surgical keyhole operation". The difference remains substantive - there is not about to be any agreement at the moment. But it is important to understand that no discussions are taking place about dumping the backstop, or putting a time limit on it. This is about a way to make it easier to sell the deal to MPs who mistrust the EU's motives. The idea of an official side letter, lodged at the UN to give force under international law, is still discussed at least by UK negotiators. But UK officials appear resigned to the fact that whatever is agreed will have less legal certainty than the treaty text itself. 

As regards the man in the pub, the more important thing he said regards the purpose of the backstop. He said the plan had to use the backstop as a bridge to a future trade deal. But it came out as a safety net. This would imply that May had been planning a customs union all along. So Robbins is quoted as saying privately that May is bluffing over no-deal, and she is bluffing over the future trade deal as well. 

There are the following possibilities, not all mutually exclusive. As the prime minister's most persistent and most senior adviser, Robbins knows what she is up to better than we do; he saw the journalist and may have deliberately misled him; Robbins might be out of the loop - what he said might have reflected May's position at one point, but no longer; or it is all true but caused a backlash that will makes it untrue. We have decided to get some fresh air instead, and walk out of the pub.

What we do see very clearly is that May has an incentive to run down the clock. Her statement to the Commons yesterday clearly suggests that this is her strategy. Yvette Cooper postponed her planned amendment to the end of the month, when the next amendable motion will be discussed. Cooper does not have a majority right now, but various Tories have indicated that they might support a Cooper amendment at the end of February. Crucially, the new Cooper amendment will not have a specified time limit. The government itself could, in theory, support the request to ask for an extension which would only be triggered if the deal is rejected at the last minute. If a deal is not agreed, an extension would be required anyway. 

Also consider that confusion is possibly useful to May as it keeps everybody else on their toes. The rise in no-deal expectation in the last couple of weeks could produce a backlash - just as this particular incident might still do. 

With all of this in mind, our central expectations remains unchanged by yesterday's development: May will run down the clock, and the power of the House of Commons relative to the prime minister will weaken. We expect May to win the meaningful vote - possibly with a comfortable margin. And it could all happen in the last week of March - who knows? maybe even on the eve of Friday, March 29, itself.

Show Comments Write a Comment

February 13, 2019

Macron loses more early advisers - or cuts them loose

Emmanuel Macron lost another of his closest advisers, Ismaël Emelien, a young and talented political consigliere from the early days when Macron was minister under François Hollande. He is the third from the close circle around Macron to throw in the towel. All three stated their reasons - family, European elections, the publication of a book on progressivism. Still, they chose to leave. The real reason behind their departure may not be known for a long time. It may have been because they advised to drop the diesel tax too early in the gilets jaunes stand-off. Or perhaps a glacial relationship with the first lady Brigitte Macron, as suggested by l'Opinion

For Macron, this is certainly a loss, but also a chance to reinvent himself. This inner circle wrote the narrative for him as candidate and president, they got him elected and were behind the triumphs in the early hours of the presidency. Now Macron has to write his own saga without the comfort of these loyal supporters. This moment of separation comes in every presidency, writes Cécile Cornudet, once the inner circle becomes overconfident. The president has to cut old ties for the presidency to be able to grow again. We are reminded of this passage of Herman Hesse's poem Stages:

Be ready, heart, for parting, new endeavour,
Be ready bravely and without remorse
To find new light that old ties cannot give.
In all beginnings dwells a magic force
For guarding us and helping us to live.
Serenely let us move to distant places
And let no sentiments of home detain us.
Show Comments Write a Comment

This is the public section of the Eurointelligence Professional Briefing, which focuses on the geopolitical aspects of our news coverage. It appears daily at 2pm CET. The full briefing, which appears at 9am CET, is only available to subscribers. Please click here for a free trial, and here for the Eurointelligence home page.


Recent News

  • February 07, 2019
  • Forget Tusk - the real action is elsewhere
  • On David Malpass and the Trump legacy
  • May 28, 2018
  • A no-confidence motion that could backfire
  • The political repercussions of a historic referendum in Ireland
  • Why the lack of an international role for the euro matters
  • September 15, 2017
  • Juncker dragged into the Catalan fray
  • What to say in Florence
  • How to fill the gap left by the British MEPs
  • January 05, 2017
  • French Socialist primaries - old wine in new bottles
  • Le Pen's hard ecu
  • Will Tusk get a second mandate?
  • Themes of 2017
  • April 25, 2016
  • The death of the Grand Coalition
  • Insurrection against TTIP
  • Juppé to benefit from Macron hype
  • On optimal currency areas
  • Why the Artic region could be the next geopolitical troublespot
  • From a currency to a people
  • April 26, 2019
  • How Brexit has given rise to different perceptions of reality
  • The EP, not Madrid, will boost Spanish clout
  • How realistic is a Gaullist Europe?
  • September 17, 2018
  • About the new partnership between Russia and China
  • EU ponders Irish backstop protocol to help May
  • February 07, 2018
  • A short note on bitcoin
  • July 04, 2017
  • On the CDU’s programme
  • Macron defines his presidential style
  • Why do we criticise modern macro?
  • November 28, 2016
  • And now what Monsieur Fillion?
  • The inescapable logic of an interim agreement
  • On Germany's foreign policy post-Trump
  • How to lose against the populists
  • April 25, 2016
  • The death of the Grand Coalition
  • Insurrection against TTIP
  • Juppé to benefit from Macron hype
  • On optimal currency areas
  • Why the Artic region could be the next geopolitical troublespot
  • From a currency to a people
  • September 26, 2019
  • Could Johnson be headed for an electoral landslide?
  • Macron's conquest of public opinion over pension reform
  • Marion Maréchal keeps dream of political comeback alive
  • March 29, 2019
  • Don't take Macron for granted
  • Green is EU's future - Loiseau takes a stance
  • October 01, 2018
  • After the referendum, more turmoil in Macedonia
  • What will happen if the UK parliament votes No?
  • Barnier's no-thanks works much better than a yes-please
  • April 03, 2018
  • Is the time for Brexit revocation running out?
  • October 04, 2017
  • On why Theresa May is likely to survive
  • On how to resolve the Brexit talks
  • Social housing - not a good start for the French government
  • April 11, 2017
  • What to expect, and not expect from Schulz
  • The view from Berlin
  • The view from Moscow
  • October 17, 2016
  • Ceta is dead for now
  • L’après-Hollande, c'est Hollande
  • SPD against Russia sanctions
  • Nissan to join customs union and other fanciful tales
  • April 25, 2016
  • The death of the Grand Coalition
  • Insurrection against TTIP
  • Juppé to benefit from Macron hype
  • On optimal currency areas
  • Why the Artic region could be the next geopolitical troublespot
  • From a currency to a people
  • October 02, 2019
  • What Boris wants...
  • Ditched again - the decline and fall of Manfred Weber
  • May 27, 2019
  • The rising chances of a no-deal Brexit
  • January 18, 2019
  • Why Dublin won't yield on the backstop
  • Town hall debates vs street protests - who is winning?
  • September 13, 2018
  • Bravo Mr Juncker for raising the issue of the euro’s international role. But what now?
  • Are the eurosceptics imploding?
  • May 10, 2018
  • Time for some clear thinking on Trump and Iran
  • Will Corbyn accept the EEA? Brexiteers can relax. He won't.
  • What next for the DUP?
  • January 05, 2018
  • Catalonia's government by Skype
  • The case for EEA membership
  • August 24, 2017
  • Legislative hyperactivity for Tsipras' new narrative
  • On the deep causes of euroscepticism
  • April 23, 2017
  • The demise of the AfD has accelerated dramatically
  • On how France will need to confront Germany
  • December 21, 2016
  • A culture of denial
  • Ukraine agreement hangs in the balance
  • Valls U-turn on 49-3
  • Beware of exotic Brexit options
  • August 22, 2016
  • Gold for Brexit
  • EU and Turkey talking past each other
  • Switzerland is the next migrant transit country
  • On the death of neoliberal economics
  • April 25, 2016
  • The death of the Grand Coalition
  • Insurrection against TTIP
  • Juppé to benefit from Macron hype
  • On optimal currency areas
  • Why the Artic region could be the next geopolitical troublespot
  • From a currency to a people
  • November 20, 2019
  • A dramatic loss of confidence in government and state in Germany
  • October 29, 2019
  • People's Vote descends into Civil War
  • CDU at odds on dealing with extreme parties
  • October 07, 2019
  • What did Conte know?
  • September 17, 2019
  • Beware of the diplomacy of humiliation
  • Germany’s climate hypocrisy
  • August 27, 2019
  • Remain’s narrowing pathway
  • Macron's diplomatic masterstroke
  • August 08, 2019
  • A poll on October 31?
  • July 22, 2019
  • Will Johnson go for elections?
  • How will von der Leyen handle the east?
  • July 05, 2019
  • Why it is difficult to legislate against a no-deal Brexit
  • June 19, 2019
  • What the US-Iran standoff tells us about the EU
  • Is Germany withholding information on right-wing extremism?
  • June 05, 2019
  • Let’s talk about Boris
  • Will Kinal be the kingmaker in Greek elections?
  • May 22, 2019
  • Better start those no-deal preparations right now
  • Europe's real transfer union is from east to west
  • May 08, 2019
  • How to think about Italy's fiscal position in 2020
  • Anti-Immigration rhetoric unites EP's future new far-right group
  • Not looking like a European century
  • April 26, 2019
  • How Brexit has given rise to different perceptions of reality
  • The EP, not Madrid, will boost Spanish clout
  • How realistic is a Gaullist Europe?
  • April 15, 2019
  • Finland's far right changes the game
  • Brexit party drawing almost even with the Tories
  • April 03, 2019
  • Game on
  • Can someone please take the table off-the-table!
  • March 26, 2019
  • No, the UK parliament has not taken control
  • Barnier for president?
  • March 18, 2019
  • May's deal still on the table. Don't rule it out.
  • EPP decision on Fidesz still open
  • On the defeat of liberalism
  • March 11, 2019
  • Ask what Europe can do for Germany - AKK's EU manifesto
  • March 04, 2019
  • Macron's two-month sprint
  • May's numbers are not there yet
  • Greening QE
  • On the "hope" of a rate raise
  • February 25, 2019
  • Deal versus short delay
  • The astonishing weakness of Five Star
  • The real threat is from the left not the right
  • February 21, 2019
  • Sound and fury, but Brexit reality unchanged
  • Supertanker Deutschland moves to join internet age
  • February 18, 2019
  • How the splits on the left and the right will affect Brexit
  • February 14, 2019
  • What will Jeremy Corbyn do?
  • Juppé, now a sage rather than Macron's man in the EP