We use cookies to help improve and maintain our site. More information.
close

March 14, 2019

A very meaningless vote

For anyone in search of a deep understanding of the Brexit process, yesterday’s events in the House of Commons are best forgotten. The UK Parliament pretended to take no-deal off the table in a series of votes that have no legal effect. We are particularly astounded by inferences that a narrow majority against a no-deal Brexit would eventually translate into a positive vote by parliament to do whatever it takes to secure a solution. For as long as MPs still cling on to their first preferences, this will not happen. We should not assume that everyone who objects to no-deal agrees on what to do next.

The odd results of yesterday’s chaos is that it has increased the probability of May’s deal passing in the final week of the month. What has emerged yesterday is that there will another interim meaningful vote - number three - next week. And we think there could be MV4 in the following and final week before the originally scheduled Brexit date. The purpose of MV3 is get the DUP and members of the European Research Group on board. There were some signs yesterday of a further softening in the position of both the DUP and some of the pro-Brexit MPs. This may not be enough for a majority - but it could get May a step closer towards a position where she can co-opt Labour MPs into accepting the deal.

The absence of evidence for a Commons majority for any kind of deal acceptable to the EU is inducing rapid shift of sentiment on the EU side. During a debate in Strasbourg about next week’s European Council in Brussels, leading MEPs from across the political spectrum warned that the prospect that a extension of Art. 50 until late May would transform the EU elections campaign into a sterile and debilitating pan-European Brexit debate. The brutality of the language reflected a rare genuine collective anger directed both at the Tories and Labour. The European elections must not be “hijacked by the British disaster”, said the usually soft-spoken Manfred Weber. “Prolong this negotiation, to do what?” asked Michel Barnier, who opened the Brexit debate. The negotiation was over, and if the UK asks for an extension of Art. 50 it must come with the UK saying what such an extension would be for.

While the political impact on this shift in sentiment in Brussels should not be underestimated, the question remains how it will affect the decision EU leaders will take when they meet in Brussels next week. There is so far no sign of a consensus emerging, and with the deepening sense of chaos in Westminster, the decision about what kind of extension to grant – which must be unanimous – will almost certainly be taken at the Council itself. At this stage, the head of states and government will each be groping for the best course of action themselves, and many will come into the Council meeting without a firm conviction about what to do. 

Show Comments Write a Comment

This is the public section of the Eurointelligence Professional Briefing, which focuses on the geopolitical aspects of our news coverage. It appears daily at 2pm CET. The full briefing, which appears at 9am CET, is only available to subscribers. Please click here for a free trial, and here for the Eurointelligence home page.

 

Recent News

  • September 17, 2018
  • About the new partnership between Russia and China
  • EU ponders Irish backstop protocol to help May
  • February 07, 2018
  • A short note on bitcoin
  • July 04, 2017
  • On the CDU’s programme
  • Macron defines his presidential style
  • Why do we criticise modern macro?
  • November 28, 2016
  • And now what Monsieur Fillion?
  • The inescapable logic of an interim agreement
  • On Germany's foreign policy post-Trump
  • How to lose against the populists
  • April 25, 2016
  • The death of the Grand Coalition
  • Insurrection against TTIP
  • Juppé to benefit from Macron hype
  • On optimal currency areas
  • Why the Artic region could be the next geopolitical troublespot
  • From a currency to a people
  • September 26, 2019
  • Could Johnson be headed for an electoral landslide?
  • Macron's conquest of public opinion over pension reform
  • Marion Maréchal keeps dream of political comeback alive
  • March 29, 2019
  • Don't take Macron for granted
  • Green is EU's future - Loiseau takes a stance
  • October 01, 2018
  • After the referendum, more turmoil in Macedonia
  • What will happen if the UK parliament votes No?
  • Barnier's no-thanks works much better than a yes-please
  • April 03, 2018
  • Is the time for Brexit revocation running out?
  • October 04, 2017
  • On why Theresa May is likely to survive
  • On how to resolve the Brexit talks
  • Social housing - not a good start for the French government
  • April 11, 2017
  • What to expect, and not expect from Schulz
  • The view from Berlin
  • The view from Moscow
  • October 17, 2016
  • Ceta is dead for now
  • L’après-Hollande, c'est Hollande
  • SPD against Russia sanctions
  • Nissan to join customs union and other fanciful tales
  • April 25, 2016
  • The death of the Grand Coalition
  • Insurrection against TTIP
  • Juppé to benefit from Macron hype
  • On optimal currency areas
  • Why the Artic region could be the next geopolitical troublespot
  • From a currency to a people
  • October 02, 2019
  • What Boris wants...
  • Ditched again - the decline and fall of Manfred Weber
  • May 27, 2019
  • The rising chances of a no-deal Brexit
  • January 18, 2019
  • Why Dublin won't yield on the backstop
  • Town hall debates vs street protests - who is winning?
  • September 13, 2018
  • Bravo Mr Juncker for raising the issue of the euro’s international role. But what now?
  • Are the eurosceptics imploding?
  • May 10, 2018
  • Time for some clear thinking on Trump and Iran
  • Will Corbyn accept the EEA? Brexiteers can relax. He won't.
  • What next for the DUP?
  • January 05, 2018
  • Catalonia's government by Skype
  • The case for EEA membership
  • August 24, 2017
  • Legislative hyperactivity for Tsipras' new narrative
  • On the deep causes of euroscepticism
  • April 23, 2017
  • The demise of the AfD has accelerated dramatically
  • On how France will need to confront Germany
  • December 21, 2016
  • A culture of denial
  • Ukraine agreement hangs in the balance
  • Valls U-turn on 49-3
  • Beware of exotic Brexit options
  • August 22, 2016
  • Gold for Brexit
  • EU and Turkey talking past each other
  • Switzerland is the next migrant transit country
  • On the death of neoliberal economics
  • April 25, 2016
  • The death of the Grand Coalition
  • Insurrection against TTIP
  • Juppé to benefit from Macron hype
  • On optimal currency areas
  • Why the Artic region could be the next geopolitical troublespot
  • From a currency to a people
  • October 07, 2019
  • What did Conte know?
  • September 17, 2019
  • Beware of the diplomacy of humiliation
  • Germany’s climate hypocrisy
  • August 27, 2019
  • Remain’s narrowing pathway
  • Macron's diplomatic masterstroke
  • July 31, 2019
  • What Cummings' appointment says about Johnson
  • July 16, 2019
  • What next, after EU sanctions Turkey?
  • What to make of Johnson’s four-point Brexit plan
  • Galileo fails, and nobody notices
  • July 02, 2019
  • How not to choose
  • Why no-deal Brexit has emerged as a strong probability
  • June 18, 2019
  • Retaliation threats over drilling
  • June 05, 2019
  • Let’s talk about Boris
  • Will Kinal be the kingmaker in Greek elections?
  • May 24, 2019
  • Rising campaign stakes are a double-edged sword for Macron
  • So May is going. And now what?
  • It's beginning to look a lot like Brexit in Switzerland
  • May 13, 2019
  • Brexit Party has already changed UK politics
  • Orbán visits Trump, after a very long wait
  • Le Pen's appeal to the PiS likely to fall on deaf ears
  • May 03, 2019
  • The pro-Brexit message from the local elections
  • Putin's silk road
  • April 24, 2019
  • May's final and biggest gamble
  • Will the EP be Brexit's great parliamentary beneficiary?
  • Can Loiseau fight the far right given her past?
  • April 11, 2019
  • Thoughts on how the European elections in the UK could affect UK and European politics
  • Far right to enter Estonia's government
  • April 04, 2019
  • Juncker seeks to pull the plug on no-deal temptations
  • Which campaign promise to break - French edition
  • The failure of strategic thinking and its consequences
  • March 29, 2019
  • Don't take Macron for granted
  • Green is EU's future - Loiseau takes a stance
  • March 25, 2019
  • An object lesson in realpolitik
  • On the probability of a no-deal Brexit
  • March 21, 2019
  • Looks like deal vs no-deal - just what May always wanted
  • March 18, 2019
  • May's deal still on the table. Don't rule it out.
  • EPP decision on Fidesz still open
  • On the defeat of liberalism
  • March 15, 2019
  • The rising significance of the European elections for Brexit
  • Orbán apologises, but only for channeling Lenin
  • Who is afraid of Marine Le Pen?