We use cookies to help improve and maintain our site. More information.
close

March 18, 2019

May's deal still on the table. Don't rule it out.

Another cliffhanger Brexit week, or perhaps not. Perhaps the biggest news we read this morning is the suggestion by Boris Johnson that he might, just might, back Theresa May's deal on condition that the next round of trade negotiations would have to be conducted in a different spirit - in other words, without May as leader. She will step down this year in any case, so this condition is not going to be hard to fulfil. Apart from Johnson, Tories now likely to support the agreement also include Ester McVeigh, Ian Duncan Smith, David Davies, and we think also Jacob Rees-Mogg. Some unrelenting backbenchers have declared that they will not budge. Thus there cannot be a Tory/DUP only majority. The government will need some Labour MPs to support the deal - or twice as many to abstain. 

The DUP is, of course, critical. Lord Trimble, the former DUP leader, seems to have swung around in favour of the deal. The DUP leadership only said it was in substantive discussions. If they agree - we think there is a more than even chance they will - the game is wide open. Ideally the government would like this settled this week, before Thursday's European Council. If the talks with the DUP succeed, a meaningful vote could be held late on Tuesday or Wednesday. But Downing Street will need to have the numbers first, and secure some support from Labour. The thing to note with the group of pro-Brexit Labour MPs is that they will only stage a mutiny at the last minute - and only if victory is certain. No one deserts to the losing side. We think May can afford between 10-20 Tory No votes at most. We would not rule out a fourth meaningful vote next week if the numbers do not come together this week. It was always our contention that this would go to the brink. 

So, what about an extension? May's gamble is to dangle the horror of a long Brexit extension in front of her own MPs' noses to pressure them to support the deal. A long extension is a death sentence for the Conservative Party. Donald Tusk's advocacy of a long extension has been useful in that respect. If feeds the conspiracy theory that the EU is plotting to keep the UK inside forever.

That said, we also think this strategy could unravel at the summit. Wolfgang Munchau lists a number of reasons why a long Brexit extension is exceedingly risky from the EU's perspective - including the impact on the balance of power in the European Parliament as the UK would have to hold elections to it - and a distraction from more important geopolitical issues. If the EU opts for a shorter extension, as we would expect, it would have less of a deterrent impact on the eurosceptics - if they expect this to result in no-deal Brexit with no possibility of extension in May or June. A short extension would still allow the UK to settle for an alternative future relationship - Norway or the single market. Changes to the political declaration do not require a long extension since the withdrawal treaty would be unchanged. The same goes for a general election. It is possible that elections could take place as early as May 2 - a date set for UK local elections. The Fixed Term Parliaments Act requires only a minimum of 17 working days between the dissolution of parliament and the elections. Elections would lead only to a one-month Brexit delay. 

The Tories will probably not want to hold elections. If you look at the most recent opinion polls, their most important feature is extraordinary volatility. The polls follow the news. 

Show Comments Write a Comment

March 18, 2019

EPP decision on Fidesz still open

Two days before the crucial EPP meeting in Brussels, the decision about whether to keep Fidesz and Viktor Orbán in, suspend their membership, or kick them out still seems as open as it was last week. The most striking thing was not Orbán's predictable move on Friday, to use Hungary's national commemoration of the 1848 uprising against the Hapsburg Monarchy to renew his attacks on the EU as an 'liberal Empire' and call for an age of 'national leaders', but the deafening silence from the CDU. The vote of the EPP presidium on Wednesday on what to do about Orbán will be a secret ballot, which is one of the reasons the outcome is so hard to predict. None of the 13 parties that have called for Fidesz' suspension or expulsion seem to have been mollified by his recent moves. If anything, sentiment seems to have hardened.

Meanwhile, we note that it is no accident that EPP spitzenkandidat published an op-ed in FAZ am Sonntag yesterday in which he called for a new mechanism to monitor EU member states' respect for EU values and democratic principles. This would entrust the ultimate supervision to the ECJ, with an independent panel of retired senior jurists monitoring behaviour. Could this be part of a strategy to propose suspending Fidesz rather than expelling it?  

Thomas Klau writes: There are plenty of plausible reasons to keep Fidesz in the EPP. The departure of Hungary's ruling party from the Christian Democratic alliance might well lead to the emergence of a major new hard-right force in the European Parliament. It would reinforce the perception and to some extent the reality that an East-West split runs through the EU and its politics. More parochially, it would lessen the EPP group's preponderance over other groups in the EP; and it might make it more difficult for Annegret Kramp-Karrenbauer and the CDU to fight and win the upcoming crucial regional elections in East Germany, where Viktor Orbán's anti-migrant discourse resonates with much of the potential CDU electorate.

So, plenty of plausible reasons - but all of them together still not good enough. Orbán has proved beyond any reasonable doubt that attacking the EU's values entrenched in such documents as the Charter of Fundamental Rights is part of his political raison d'être. His transformation of Hungary into a semi-authoritarian state progresses by the day. Most importantly, not a week goes by without Orbán or his political henchmen signalling their appalling fondness for the vilest kind of antisemitic tropes. That the Orbáns of this world all too often seem to get a free pass from the present government of Israel should not be good enough for the EU, not for the EPP, and certainly not for Germany's CDU and CSU. It is high time for the EPP to salvage its reputation and cut Fidesz loose.

Show Comments Write a Comment

March 18, 2019

On the defeat of liberalism

Our observations about the increasing problems of the EU and the eurozone reflect a much bigger global phenomenon - the decline of liberal democracy. Robert Kagan, writing in the Washington Post, puts the decline of liberalism into a broader historical context. He compares the emergence of the 21st century strongmen - like Vladimir Putin or Recep Tayyip Erdogan - to the rise of fascism and communism in the early 20th century and sees it as an indictment of the failure of liberal society. And he makes the observation that these tendencies are particularly strong in good and relatively peaceful times. Kagan notes that the perception of insecurity in the widest sense of the word is the main factor in explaining the retreat of liberalism in the modern age. Liberalism provides security against intrusion from the state, but lacks in other dimensions:

"Humans do not yearn only for freedom. They also seek security — not only physical security against attack but also the security that comes from family, tribe, race and culture. Often, people welcome a strong, charismatic leader who can provide that kind of protection. Liberalism has no particular answer to these needs."

He notes that there is nothing special about the decline of liberalism in our modern age. He ends his long essay with the observation that the mainly older white males who are the main supporters of illiberal policies act, as he calls it, with an unspoken faith that the liberalism that allows them to challenge the system will be protected by the very liberalism they are criticising.

Kagan makes a number of subtle points worthy of deeper reflection but, like so many other liberals, Kagan too is not confronting liberalism non-self-correcting failures, like the persistent tendency for financial instability and the impacts on society through economic policies. This is not just about perceptions.

Show Comments Write a Comment

This is the public section of the Eurointelligence Professional Briefing, which focuses on the geopolitical aspects of our news coverage. It appears daily at 2pm CET. The full briefing, which appears at 9am CET, is only available to subscribers. Please click here for a free trial, and here for the Eurointelligence home page.

 

Recent News

  • October 21, 2019
  • Philippe to brace for more union protests
  • Greens are the electorates' new favourite
  • February 07, 2019
  • Forget Tusk - the real action is elsewhere
  • On David Malpass and the Trump legacy
  • May 28, 2018
  • A no-confidence motion that could backfire
  • The political repercussions of a historic referendum in Ireland
  • Why the lack of an international role for the euro matters
  • September 15, 2017
  • Juncker dragged into the Catalan fray
  • What to say in Florence
  • How to fill the gap left by the British MEPs
  • January 05, 2017
  • French Socialist primaries - old wine in new bottles
  • Le Pen's hard ecu
  • Will Tusk get a second mandate?
  • Themes of 2017
  • April 25, 2016
  • The death of the Grand Coalition
  • Insurrection against TTIP
  • Juppé to benefit from Macron hype
  • On optimal currency areas
  • Why the Artic region could be the next geopolitical troublespot
  • From a currency to a people
  • December 03, 2019
  • What to look out for in the last week of the compaign
  • Trump threatens tariffs on French luxury exports
  • April 26, 2019
  • How Brexit has given rise to different perceptions of reality
  • The EP, not Madrid, will boost Spanish clout
  • How realistic is a Gaullist Europe?
  • September 17, 2018
  • About the new partnership between Russia and China
  • EU ponders Irish backstop protocol to help May
  • February 07, 2018
  • A short note on bitcoin
  • July 04, 2017
  • On the CDU’s programme
  • Macron defines his presidential style
  • Why do we criticise modern macro?
  • November 28, 2016
  • And now what Monsieur Fillion?
  • The inescapable logic of an interim agreement
  • On Germany's foreign policy post-Trump
  • How to lose against the populists
  • April 25, 2016
  • The death of the Grand Coalition
  • Insurrection against TTIP
  • Juppé to benefit from Macron hype
  • On optimal currency areas
  • Why the Artic region could be the next geopolitical troublespot
  • From a currency to a people
  • September 26, 2019
  • Could Johnson be headed for an electoral landslide?
  • Macron's conquest of public opinion over pension reform
  • Marion Maréchal keeps dream of political comeback alive
  • March 29, 2019
  • Don't take Macron for granted
  • Green is EU's future - Loiseau takes a stance
  • October 01, 2018
  • After the referendum, more turmoil in Macedonia
  • What will happen if the UK parliament votes No?
  • Barnier's no-thanks works much better than a yes-please
  • April 03, 2018
  • Is the time for Brexit revocation running out?
  • October 04, 2017
  • On why Theresa May is likely to survive
  • On how to resolve the Brexit talks
  • Social housing - not a good start for the French government
  • April 11, 2017
  • What to expect, and not expect from Schulz
  • The view from Berlin
  • The view from Moscow
  • October 17, 2016
  • Ceta is dead for now
  • L’après-Hollande, c'est Hollande
  • SPD against Russia sanctions
  • Nissan to join customs union and other fanciful tales
  • April 25, 2016
  • The death of the Grand Coalition
  • Insurrection against TTIP
  • Juppé to benefit from Macron hype
  • On optimal currency areas
  • Why the Artic region could be the next geopolitical troublespot
  • From a currency to a people
  • October 02, 2019
  • What Boris wants...
  • Ditched again - the decline and fall of Manfred Weber
  • May 27, 2019
  • The rising chances of a no-deal Brexit
  • January 18, 2019
  • Why Dublin won't yield on the backstop
  • Town hall debates vs street protests - who is winning?
  • September 13, 2018
  • Bravo Mr Juncker for raising the issue of the euro’s international role. But what now?
  • Are the eurosceptics imploding?
  • May 10, 2018
  • Time for some clear thinking on Trump and Iran
  • Will Corbyn accept the EEA? Brexiteers can relax. He won't.
  • What next for the DUP?
  • January 05, 2018
  • Catalonia's government by Skype
  • The case for EEA membership
  • August 24, 2017
  • Legislative hyperactivity for Tsipras' new narrative
  • On the deep causes of euroscepticism
  • April 23, 2017
  • The demise of the AfD has accelerated dramatically
  • On how France will need to confront Germany
  • December 21, 2016
  • A culture of denial
  • Ukraine agreement hangs in the balance
  • Valls U-turn on 49-3
  • Beware of exotic Brexit options
  • August 22, 2016
  • Gold for Brexit
  • EU and Turkey talking past each other
  • Switzerland is the next migrant transit country
  • On the death of neoliberal economics
  • April 25, 2016
  • The death of the Grand Coalition
  • Insurrection against TTIP
  • Juppé to benefit from Macron hype
  • On optimal currency areas
  • Why the Artic region could be the next geopolitical troublespot
  • From a currency to a people
  • December 10, 2019
  • Squeezed between US and Russia - Open Skies edition
  • November 18, 2019
  • Is Macron facing another uprise against elites?
  • Forget the inflation target: Lagarde’s job is much bigger.
  • October 27, 2019
  • German political centre is melting
  • Train drivers in all-out confrontation with Macron
  • Erdogan makes threats again
  • October 07, 2019
  • What did Conte know?
  • September 17, 2019
  • Beware of the diplomacy of humiliation
  • Germany’s climate hypocrisy
  • August 27, 2019
  • Remain’s narrowing pathway
  • Macron's diplomatic masterstroke
  • July 31, 2019
  • What Cummings' appointment says about Johnson
  • July 16, 2019
  • What next, after EU sanctions Turkey?
  • What to make of Johnson’s four-point Brexit plan
  • Galileo fails, and nobody notices
  • July 02, 2019
  • How not to choose
  • Why no-deal Brexit has emerged as a strong probability
  • June 18, 2019
  • Retaliation threats over drilling
  • June 05, 2019
  • Let’s talk about Boris
  • Will Kinal be the kingmaker in Greek elections?
  • May 24, 2019
  • Rising campaign stakes are a double-edged sword for Macron
  • So May is going. And now what?
  • It's beginning to look a lot like Brexit in Switzerland
  • May 13, 2019
  • Brexit Party has already changed UK politics
  • Orbán visits Trump, after a very long wait
  • Le Pen's appeal to the PiS likely to fall on deaf ears
  • May 03, 2019
  • The pro-Brexit message from the local elections
  • Putin's silk road
  • April 24, 2019
  • May's final and biggest gamble
  • Will the EP be Brexit's great parliamentary beneficiary?
  • Can Loiseau fight the far right given her past?
  • April 15, 2019
  • Finland's far right changes the game
  • Brexit party drawing almost even with the Tories
  • April 08, 2019
  • Welcome to the new Brexit grand coalition
  • Waiting for Macron's next move
  • April 02, 2019
  • Meaningless II
  • What will come out of the grand débat?
  • March 28, 2019
  • Fidesz exposes EPP to barrage of provocations
  • How Berlin has turned the ghost of Aachen into a poltergeist
  • March 25, 2019
  • An object lesson in realpolitik
  • On the probability of a no-deal Brexit
  • March 21, 2019
  • Looks like deal vs no-deal - just what May always wanted
  • March 19, 2019
  • The rules of cricket - abridged
  • It's to be China week in Brussels (not Brexit, sorry Theresa)
  • Macron gets tough on law and order
  • March 18, 2019
  • May's deal still on the table. Don't rule it out.
  • EPP decision on Fidesz still open
  • On the defeat of liberalism