We use cookies to help improve and maintain our site. More information.
close

April 30, 2019

Labour's big day

We do not have the foggiest idea what the Labour Party's national executive committee will decide today. The NEC meets to agree the manifesto for the European elections. The big debating point is whether or not to support the second referendum.

We think the outcome is more open than widely predicted. Jeremy Corbyn has been resisting pressure from inside his party to accept a second referendum as the default position. The Guardian suggests that there could be compromise - a second referendum as a price for a Brexit supported by the Tory party or a no-deal Brexit - but leaving the door open to a Tory/Labour deal without a second referendum. As the Labour supporters of the single market and Norway options keep on pointing out, there can be no cross-party deal unless Labour drops the idea of a second referendum. A compromise would keep it alive, but it would clearly not satisfy the second referendum supporters. They want Brexit reversed. They don't want a compromise.

There have been reports that some NEC members, including trade unionists previously supportive of Corbyn, may be shifting their position. 100 MPs have written to the NEC in favour of a second referendum. A much smaller number of MPs are lobbying against it. 

No matter what Labour's NEC agrees, we see no majority for a second referendum in the current parliament. But today's debate is important as it sets the agenda for a potential early general election. There are strong electoral arguments for Labour to support a second referendum. It could regain some of the lost support in Scotland, but would stand to lose several marginal seats in pro-Brexit constituencies in the north of England. There is also a shift of views within Momentum, the left-wing group within Labour that supports Corbyn. The Labour leader will therefore tread carefully. This would point to a compromise, but the politics of Labour can never be taken for granted.

Show Comments Write a Comment

April 30, 2019

Spain now turns to its next elections

The days of single-party majority rule may be over in Madrid, but coalition-building does not yet come naturally to Spain’s political parties. As the country contemplates the new political landscape emerging from Sunday’s vote, Ciudadanos has reiterated its hostility to a coalition agreement with the PSOE even if such a social-democratic/liberal alliance would command a clear majority in the lower house of parliament. To be fair, the antipathy is mutual given the sustained attacks against Pedro Sánchez by Albert Rivera, leader of Ciudadanos. Rivera has positioned his rising political force clearly to the right of the political centre, and is vying with the PP for the mantle of main opposition force. The political attention in Spain will now shift to the local, regional and European elections on May 26. Another massive defeat for the PP would further strengthen Ciudadanos’ relative position.

In the meantime, the new Spanish parliament will convene on May 21, with the election of the speaker the first important item on the agenda. Only after the speaker is elected will the king start formal consultations with the parties, so this should happen after the local, regional and European elections. There may be some exploratory contacts among the parties before that, but don’t expect the process of forming a government to start until June. An alliance between PSOE and Podemos remains the most likely outcome, with Podemos keen to enter the government. This would give post-Franco Spain its first government ministers from a political force to the left of the PSOE. But this is not the only option. The PSOE is tempted to try and form a minority government without Podemos' participation, counting on Spain's far left and the Catalan separatists to keep it in office so as to avoid new elections that would risk a possible right-wing majority.

Show Comments Write a Comment

April 30, 2019

On the hypocrisy of the German debt debate

We profoundly disagree with the emerging consensus that the German constitutional debt brake was a good idea when it was conceived ten years ago, but that it is no longer the case. This sentiment was expressed recently and separately by two economists, Michael Hüther and Jean Pisani-Ferry. We think this reflects an astonishing degree of hypocrisy. The debt brake is not an example of something that fell foul to a shift in circumstance. It was unsustainable from the outset. The real problem is that it was included in Germany's constitution. Change now requires a two-thirds parliamentary majority. Similarly, the main problem with the eurozone's fiscal compact is that it forces member states to make a balanced-budget rule a permanent and preferably constitutional part of their legal systems. And the fiscal compact itself is an international treaty that can only be amended by unanimity.

The German debt brake was an unsustainable fiscal rule from the moment it was constructed. Back in 2009 Wolfgang Münchau wrote in the FT that a rule that would cap deficits at 0.35% of GDP at the bottom of the cycle, and required the government to run small surpluses through the cycle, would lead to the eventual elimination of all debt. Ten years later the FT quotes Marcel Fratzscher echoing this point about debt runoff as if it were a sudden realisation and not a timeless arithmetical conclusion. Münchau also made the point that, at the time it was adopted, the German rule was inconsistent with the European fiscal rules. This inconsistency was then fixed in the worst possible way, by Germany taking advantage of the eurozone government debt crisis to persuade other member states to follow suit.

The German economic debate on reforming the debt brake, as reported by the FT, makes for bizarre reading. At an expert meeting organised by Jakob von Weizsäcker, since this year chief economist at the German finance ministry, the question was whether there isn't a good deal to be had by investing money that is cost-free to borrow. Lars Feld, a member of the German council of economic expert, wonders why any investment cannot be financed through taxes - that is, preserving the fiscal balance. Feld even questions whether Germany has big investment needs at the moment: there isn't even a consensus among German economists that the country's infrastructure suffers from underinvestment. Feld, moreover, argues that German investment is low because of bureaucracy, not fiscal rules.  

A reform of the German debt brake would require constitutional change, but the numbers are not there. The AfD has about 15% of MPs, the FDP 10%. This means all the other parties needs to be on board, including the entire CDU and CSU. Even if a consensus were to emerge among German economists that the debt brake may not be as great an idea as they once thought, it would be very hard to undo it in the current fragmented state of the country's politics. And, on present political trends, it is likely to become more fragmented. It was politically easy to agree a constitutional change in 2009 when the grand coalition itself had more than a two-thirds majority. The current majority of the coalition is wafer-thin. Angela Merkel got elected with a majority of 10 votes in the Bundestag. Even though the Greens and the Left Party would support a constitutional change, they are certain to make demands the government is unlikely to fulfil. And we doubt very much that the consensus on the debt brake is shifting inside the CDU to such an extent that every CDU/CSU MP would support changing the constitution. Fiscal policy is part of a belief system in Germany. 

The lesson from this episode - and from the Maastricht Treaty before it - is: never put numbers into a treaty or constitution. Stick to broad principles.

Show Comments Write a Comment

This is the public section of the Eurointelligence Professional Briefing, which focuses on the geopolitical aspects of our news coverage. It appears daily at 2pm CET. The full briefing, which appears at 9am CET, is only available to subscribers. Please click here for a free trial, and here for the Eurointelligence home page.

 

Recent News

  • October 17, 2019
  • A dangerous game for the EU
  • After Brexit, get ready for a German EU budget rebate
  • August 20, 2018
  • ... and a subtle shift in EU policies towards both Russia and Turkey
  • Nothing to celebrate about the end of the bailout programme
  • Support for Brexit holding up
  • June 20, 2017
  • How to soften Brexit?
  • The deep roots of Brexit: Thatcher and the Germans
  • April 25, 2016
  • The death of the Grand Coalition
  • Insurrection against TTIP
  • Juppé to benefit from Macron hype
  • On optimal currency areas
  • Why the Artic region could be the next geopolitical troublespot
  • From a currency to a people
  • August 27, 2019
  • Remain’s narrowing pathway
  • Macron's diplomatic masterstroke
  • July 09, 2018
  • German panic about Target2
  • AfD level with SPD
  • How the EU could fail
  • May 31, 2017
  • Getting real in the debate on the euro's future
  • Russia's growing influence in Italy
  • April 25, 2016
  • The death of the Grand Coalition
  • Insurrection against TTIP
  • Juppé to benefit from Macron hype
  • On optimal currency areas
  • Why the Artic region could be the next geopolitical troublespot
  • From a currency to a people
  • June 18, 2019
  • Retaliation threats over drilling
  • May 28, 2018
  • A no-confidence motion that could backfire
  • The political repercussions of a historic referendum in Ireland
  • Why the lack of an international role for the euro matters
  • May 10, 2017
  • PSOE primary campaign in full swing
  • Czech government crisis escalates
  • Backroom dealing on electoral reform in Italy
  • April 25, 2016
  • The death of the Grand Coalition
  • Insurrection against TTIP
  • Juppé to benefit from Macron hype
  • On optimal currency areas
  • Why the Artic region could be the next geopolitical troublespot
  • From a currency to a people
  • April 06, 2020
  • The feedback loop of Covid-19 and inequalities - part 10 of our series
  • How confinement affects mental health
  • April 09, 2019
  • What can go wrong now?
  • April 13, 2018
  • German support for eurozone reform next to zero...
  • ... and no support for France on Syria either
  • A French sermon
  • Why the euro endures
  • April 19, 2017
  • Shadows of money
  • Breppe Grillo vs Eurointelligence
  • April 25, 2016
  • The death of the Grand Coalition
  • Insurrection against TTIP
  • Juppé to benefit from Macron hype
  • On optimal currency areas
  • Why the Artic region could be the next geopolitical troublespot
  • From a currency to a people
  • January 06, 2020
  • A decade that started with a bang
  • What to expect of Spain's next government
  • Divide et impera: Macron's pension reform strategy
  • January 29, 2019
  • What comes after plan B fails? Plan C, of course. C for cliff-edge
  • Gilets jaunes, how to structure a movement in free flow?
  • European Court of Auditors criticises Juncker’s investment fund
  • February 26, 2018
  • Angela Merkel's cabinet
  • March 27, 2017
  • Governing formation troubles - Northern Ireland edition
  • Did Trump present Merkel with a bill for Nato?
  • April 25, 2016
  • The death of the Grand Coalition
  • Insurrection against TTIP
  • Juppé to benefit from Macron hype
  • On optimal currency areas
  • Why the Artic region could be the next geopolitical troublespot
  • From a currency to a people
  • September 23, 2019
  • Corbyn’s last big battle
  • Germany’s CO2 compromise meets all targets - except the climate targets
  • November 13, 2018
  • Peak Salvini?
  • Protest uberisation
  • January 05, 2018
  • Catalonia's government by Skype
  • The case for EEA membership
  • February 28, 2017
  • Is Hamon losing the right wing of his party?
  • Something we just don’t understand
  • Solve the problem
  • April 25, 2016
  • The death of the Grand Coalition
  • Insurrection against TTIP
  • Juppé to benefit from Macron hype
  • On optimal currency areas
  • Why the Artic region could be the next geopolitical troublespot
  • From a currency to a people
  • March 11, 2020
  • While Italy is in lockdown, Germany allows football matches
  • Ireland grand coalition
  • May 31, 2019
  • Salvini’s frightening strength
  • The significance of Corbyn’s latest flipflop on the referendum
  • August 20, 2018
  • ... and a subtle shift in EU policies towards both Russia and Turkey
  • Nothing to celebrate about the end of the bailout programme
  • Support for Brexit holding up
  • November 09, 2017
  • From street protests to road closures
  • What Russia wants
  • January 31, 2017
  • Project fear against Italexit
  • On how not to frustrate Brexit
  • April 25, 2016
  • The death of the Grand Coalition
  • Insurrection against TTIP
  • Juppé to benefit from Macron hype
  • On optimal currency areas
  • Why the Artic region could be the next geopolitical troublespot
  • From a currency to a people
  • June 29, 2020
  • Édouard Philippe - mayor or prime minister?
  • Sir Humphrey, R.I.P.
  • October 17, 2019
  • A dangerous game for the EU
  • After Brexit, get ready for a German EU budget rebate
  • February 04, 2019
  • Watch out for the resurgence in Tory unity
  • The gilets-jaunes' effect on the European elections
  • What did he possibly mean by that?
  • May 25, 2018
  • Rejected by US, Germany is turning towards China...
  • ...and France is turning to Russia
  • UK ties Galileo to security partnership
  • Germans are discovering miniBoTs
  • September 14, 2017
  • Bravo Mr Juncker
  • ... what he said about the labour market
  • ... and what his speech means for Brexit
  • January 05, 2017
  • French Socialist primaries - old wine in new bottles
  • Le Pen's hard ecu
  • Will Tusk get a second mandate?
  • Themes of 2017
  • April 25, 2016
  • The death of the Grand Coalition
  • Insurrection against TTIP
  • Juppé to benefit from Macron hype
  • On optimal currency areas
  • Why the Artic region could be the next geopolitical troublespot
  • From a currency to a people
  • December 02, 2019
  • Will pension reform protests spiral out of control?
  • Malta's PM resigns over murder case
  • April 24, 2019
  • May's final and biggest gamble
  • Will the EP be Brexit's great parliamentary beneficiary?
  • Can Loiseau fight the far right given her past?
  • September 12, 2018
  • It is easy to criticise Chequers but very hard to come up with an alternative
  • February 05, 2018
  • How big is Germany's external surplus, really?
  • Macron's first election test
  • Coeure's endorsement of a fiscal union
  • July 03, 2017
  • Can Greece exit its programme without a credit line?
  • The softening Brexit
  • Macron's state of the nation address
  • November 28, 2016
  • And now what Monsieur Fillion?
  • The inescapable logic of an interim agreement
  • On Germany's foreign policy post-Trump
  • How to lose against the populists
  • April 25, 2016
  • The death of the Grand Coalition
  • Insurrection against TTIP
  • Juppé to benefit from Macron hype
  • On optimal currency areas
  • Why the Artic region could be the next geopolitical troublespot
  • From a currency to a people
  • March 16, 2020
  • Why many of the Covid-19 statistics are misleading
  • September 17, 2019
  • Beware of the diplomacy of humiliation
  • Germany’s climate hypocrisy
  • March 18, 2019
  • May's deal still on the table. Don't rule it out.
  • EPP decision on Fidesz still open
  • On the defeat of liberalism
  • September 21, 2018
  • SPD ministers want to continue grand coalition
  • March 28, 2018
  • The real reason for the sanctions against Russia
  • Wishful thinking: Brexit edition
  • Wishful thinking: Future of euro edition
  • Wishful thinking: Italy edition
  • October 02, 2017
  • Catalonia recalls EU and eurozone instability
  • French trade unions increase pressure over labour reforms
  • Watch out for a political accident in the UK
  • Municipal elections boost Portugal's Socialists
  • April 10, 2017
  • Nein, nein, nein, und nein
  • Sounds like a bad Brexit story, but ain’t
  • On how not to exit the euro
  • October 17, 2016
  • Ceta is dead for now
  • L’après-Hollande, c'est Hollande
  • SPD against Russia sanctions
  • Nissan to join customs union and other fanciful tales
  • April 25, 2016
  • The death of the Grand Coalition
  • Insurrection against TTIP
  • Juppé to benefit from Macron hype
  • On optimal currency areas
  • Why the Artic region could be the next geopolitical troublespot
  • From a currency to a people
  • June 02, 2020
  • Watch out for Söder
  • Libya exposes European divisions
  • January 24, 2020
  • Is Germany anti-semitic and racist?
  • Did the Greek financial crisis play a role in Brexit?
  • September 18, 2019
  • No doubt, this is a constitutional crisis
  • Macron's immigration bid
  • May 13, 2019
  • Brexit Party has already changed UK politics
  • Orbán visits Trump, after a very long wait
  • Le Pen's appeal to the PiS likely to fall on deaf ears
  • January 04, 2019
  • Will the AfD become the Dexit party?
  • Romania's corruption problem in the spotlight of its EU presidency
  • August 28, 2018
  • Urban politics and national crisis - the Irish case
  • How anti-semitism became one of the main issues in British politics
  • April 25, 2018
  • Macron's pitch to Trump
  • Montoro in Schleswig-Holstein
  • The old world and the new
  • December 22, 2017
  • Will Macron be the new de Gaulle?
  • 2018 through the looking glass
  • August 21, 2017
  • Soft, getting softer
  • Tsipras' chances of a boost
  • On the fallacy of a middle-ground option for the eurozone
  • April 20, 2017
  • Don’t bet on Trump turning globalist
  • A note on UK election polls
  • December 20, 2016
  • The politics of terror
  • On Lagarde
  • Is a disruptive Brexit possible?
  • August 22, 2016
  • Gold for Brexit
  • EU and Turkey talking past each other
  • Switzerland is the next migrant transit country
  • On the death of neoliberal economics
  • April 25, 2016
  • The death of the Grand Coalition
  • Insurrection against TTIP
  • Juppé to benefit from Macron hype
  • On optimal currency areas
  • Why the Artic region could be the next geopolitical troublespot
  • From a currency to a people
  • June 29, 2020
  • Édouard Philippe - mayor or prime minister?
  • Sir Humphrey, R.I.P.
  • June 01, 2020
  • Refugees' mass eviction in Greece
  • This is Brexit week again
  • May 05, 2020
  • Germany's cash-for-clunkers
  • What about the summer holidays?
  • April 10, 2020
  • Italy has folded for the sake of a deal. Plus ca change.
  • ECB governors agreed on size of bond purchases, less on composition
  • France triples its fiscal stimulus
  • Direct lending to governments, big and small
  • Some bad Covid-19 news from Germany
  • March 16, 2020
  • Why many of the Covid-19 statistics are misleading
  • February 19, 2020
  • Degrowth isn't enough to stem climate change
  • Is Renzi finished?
  • Welcome to Germany, Tesla
  • January 28, 2020
  • Moving forward or calming down on Macron's reform agenda?
  • Marjan Sarec' bold move
  • Is the EU about to overplay its hand in the Brexit talks?
  • January 06, 2020
  • A decade that started with a bang
  • What to expect of Spain's next government
  • Divide et impera: Macron's pension reform strategy
  • December 09, 2019
  • The next three days
  • November 19, 2019
  • Not the time to bet against the Franco-German relationship
  • German employers and union united against the debt brake
  • November 01, 2019
  • Beware of the fallacy of composition and hindsight bias - Brexit edition
  • October 14, 2019
  • What is Turkey's medium-term game?
  • Germany sabotages EIB climate change policies
  • September 26, 2019
  • Could Johnson be headed for an electoral landslide?
  • Macron's conquest of public opinion over pension reform
  • Marion Maréchal keeps dream of political comeback alive
  • September 11, 2019
  • What are the chances of a deal?
  • August 27, 2019
  • Remain’s narrowing pathway
  • Macron's diplomatic masterstroke
  • July 30, 2019
  • Forex shifts are object lesson in costs of complacent analysis
  • July 17, 2019
  • The dreaded scenario
  • Meet the Labour no-dealers
  • July 05, 2019
  • Why it is difficult to legislate against a no-deal Brexit
  • June 24, 2019
  • Economic reform has torn up the SPD - climate policy does the same for the CDU/CSU
  • Not intruding, not really
  • June 13, 2019
  • On the large and rising risk of a no-deal Brexit
  • Unite and divide - Act II of Edouard Philippe
  • June 05, 2019
  • Let’s talk about Boris
  • Will Kinal be the kingmaker in Greek elections?
  • May 28, 2019
  • Greens in EP boosted by numbers and national politics
  • May 22, 2019
  • Better start those no-deal preparations right now
  • Europe's real transfer union is from east to west
  • May 15, 2019
  • Why an anti-Macron vote may mobilise in this EP election
  • May's last throw of the dice - a meaningful vote on June 4 or 5
  • May 10, 2019
  • Target2 debate raises legitimate questions with unsatisfactory answers
  • No more German questions please
  • May 07, 2019
  • … while Macron’s European troubles have already begun, and might get even worse
  • Don't discount a Brexit deal
  • Is Tsipras too complacent?
  • Costa - the fiscally responsible Socialist
  • May 03, 2019
  • The pro-Brexit message from the local elections
  • Putin's silk road
  • May 01, 2019
  • Labour votes against obligatory second referendum
  • On the link between output gap measures and the rise of political extremism
  • Berlin's inconclusive Kosovo conference
  • April 30, 2019
  • Labour's big day
  • Spain now turns to its next elections
  • On the hypocrisy of the German debt debate