We use cookies to help improve and maintain our site. More information.

June 20, 2019

Forget the candidates and look at those who vote

The big news in the UK is that somebody who never had the slightest chance of becoming prime minister, is now not becoming prime minister. Interested in the second item in the news?

We understand why reporters are clamouring for a real contest, and why they are writing up the chances of hopeless candidates. It is an arithmetical certainty that one of the hopeless contenders will make to the final two in today's last set of polls. None of them have any hope of supplanting Boris Johnson because he is the only one with a clear message on Brexit: whatever happens, no extension.  

That said, a BBC reporter wanted to have deciphered during the TV debate that Boris Johnson had softened his position. Johnson said something along the lines that it would be eminently feasible to deliver a deal before October. The reporter interpreted the statement as meaning that a no-deal Brexit was eminently feasible, which would indeed have been a qualification of the previous position. We did not read it that way.

Perhaps the more important news story was a poll by YouGov revealing the sheer extremism among Conservative members. Remember these are the ones who will vote. The polls asked about trade-offs: would you still want Brexit even if that meant Scotland would leave the UK? 63% said yes. Or if it damaged the economy? 61% said yes. Or if Northern Ireland left the UK? 59% said yes. The most extreme answers is this: what if the Conservative Party itself were destroyed? 54% still think, yes, Brexit is worth it.

These polls are more revealing than the headline polls because they tell us how strongly the pro-Brexit feelings are. The Remain side never quite managed to get passions up that high. It also shows why Johnson has enjoyed a run-away lead.

It also explains why Johnson has no incentive to seek any Brexit extension. The chance of an early election is high, not just of Brexit but because the Tory-DUP alliance hangs on a three-seat majority. If he has not delivered Brexit by October, the chances are that the Brexit party will destroy the Tories at the next general election and hand Jeremy Corbyn a landslide victory. A Brexit extension would be a political suicide note. Johnson would stand a much better chance if he proposed elections in October, pitching his clear position for an immediate Brexit against Jeremy Corbyn's prevarication.

In this context we noted a story in the Guardian. Corbyn has just finished reading Harold Wilson's autobiography, and was particularly impressed by the former Labour prime minister's decision not to take a stance in the 1975 EU referendum and to let his colleagues battle it out. 

That seems to us the most plausible course of action for him to take. The Labour party is divided. A group of 25 Labour MPs have written to Corbyn not to support Remain. All of them would stand to lose their seats if Labour were to adopt a formal anti-Brexit position. The number of Labour MPs opposed to a second referendum exceeds the number of Tory MPs in favour, which is why we think a general election is the more likely public-vote scenario. Also consider that both Johnson and Corbyn have reasons to prefer an election to a referendum. 

So what would happen if the EU were to give Johnson a new deal and this went to parliament? We would not rule out that Johnson might unite his party and secure some votes from opposition MPs. In this scenario, we do not believe there would be a majority for a second referendum. The number of Tories in favour of a second referendum would then shrink to single digits, while the 25 Labour MPs would still be opposed to it - and glad to be off the hook. A no-deal Brexit scenario, whether intended from the outset or the result of no deal being agreed or ratified, is very likely to result in an election. 

Show Comments Write a Comment

June 20, 2019

The death of the old guard in French politics

In French party politics, nothing is like it used to be. Big shots in the two traditional parties lost their standing and their election appeal. Les Républicains lost Alain Juppé to the constitutional council, and Francois Fillon tripped over his personal affairs. The next grandee likely to fall is the iconic godfather Nicolas Sarkozy, who is to stand trial over bribing and influence peddling in connection with the Qatar World Cup. After a last appeal was rejected yesterday, Sarkozy has never been so close to conviction. It would be the first time a former French president stands trial for actions taken during his presidency, and he could end up in jail for up to 10 years.

All those who dream of a political future distance themselves from these grandees, or flee the party forgetting their roots. The most likely LR leader to emerge is Christian Jacob, the party leader in the senate, also because he is standing in no-one's shadow. Likely candidates for the next presidential elections - Xavier Bertrand, François Baroin, Valerie Pécresse - got as far away as possible from what is and was Les Républicains. The Socialists are in no better shape, even if the reasons for the retreat of grandees like François Hollande are different. 

This is the period when old ways have to die to give way for the new, writes Cécile Cornudet. Will the new ways be the end of the French political parties as we know them? What happens to the loyal voters, where do they go now? What is clear is that we are in a period of transition, with more volatile and unpredictable shifts in voters' allegiances ahead. This phenomenon is also observed in other EU countries.

Show Comments Write a Comment

June 20, 2019

When to take Salvini seriously, and when not

We consider Matteo Salvini as very serious challenger to the EU's established order - a threat that is much underestimated in Brussels. He has strong political support back home. His position on the eurozone has a crazy-but-not-stupid quality to it. The minibots, devised by his party, could be a very effective instrument in a financial crisis, and a challenge to EU law for which the EU has no effective remedies. They are also a perfect blackmail instrument. 

But what to make his U-turn on China? During his visit to the US he promised his interlocutors, Mike Pence and Mike Pompeo, that Italy would be the US' strongest supporter in Europe. Italy specifically agreed with the US position on China and Iran. 

It is in the nature of the populist to tell people what they want to hear. Whether he is really going to stop China's investment into the port of Trieste or block Huawei's 5G bid is very doubtful. Italy is not in a position to play hard-to-get in the 5G stakes. The queue of foreign investors eager to invest into Italian infrastructure is also of finite length. For a number of reasons Huawei remains the best-placed supplier of 5G technology for many European countries, including Italy.

Show Comments Write a Comment

This is the public section of the Eurointelligence Professional Briefing, which focuses on the geopolitical aspects of our news coverage. It appears daily at 2pm CET. The full briefing, which appears at 9am CET, is only available to subscribers. Please click here for a free trial, and here for the Eurointelligence home page.


Recent News

  • December 02, 2019
  • Will pension reform protests spiral out of control?
  • Malta's PM resigns over murder case
  • April 24, 2019
  • May's final and biggest gamble
  • Will the EP be Brexit's great parliamentary beneficiary?
  • Can Loiseau fight the far right given her past?
  • September 12, 2018
  • It is easy to criticise Chequers but very hard to come up with an alternative
  • February 05, 2018
  • How big is Germany's external surplus, really?
  • Macron's first election test
  • Coeure's endorsement of a fiscal union
  • July 03, 2017
  • Can Greece exit its programme without a credit line?
  • The softening Brexit
  • Macron's state of the nation address
  • November 28, 2016
  • And now what Monsieur Fillion?
  • The inescapable logic of an interim agreement
  • On Germany's foreign policy post-Trump
  • How to lose against the populists
  • April 25, 2016
  • The death of the Grand Coalition
  • Insurrection against TTIP
  • Juppé to benefit from Macron hype
  • On optimal currency areas
  • Why the Artic region could be the next geopolitical troublespot
  • From a currency to a people
  • September 17, 2019
  • Beware of the diplomacy of humiliation
  • Germany’s climate hypocrisy
  • March 18, 2019
  • May's deal still on the table. Don't rule it out.
  • EPP decision on Fidesz still open
  • On the defeat of liberalism
  • September 21, 2018
  • SPD ministers want to continue grand coalition
  • March 28, 2018
  • The real reason for the sanctions against Russia
  • Wishful thinking: Brexit edition
  • Wishful thinking: Future of euro edition
  • Wishful thinking: Italy edition
  • October 02, 2017
  • Catalonia recalls EU and eurozone instability
  • French trade unions increase pressure over labour reforms
  • Watch out for a political accident in the UK
  • Municipal elections boost Portugal's Socialists
  • April 10, 2017
  • Nein, nein, nein, und nein
  • Sounds like a bad Brexit story, but ain’t
  • On how not to exit the euro
  • October 17, 2016
  • Ceta is dead for now
  • L’après-Hollande, c'est Hollande
  • SPD against Russia sanctions
  • Nissan to join customs union and other fanciful tales
  • April 25, 2016
  • The death of the Grand Coalition
  • Insurrection against TTIP
  • Juppé to benefit from Macron hype
  • On optimal currency areas
  • Why the Artic region could be the next geopolitical troublespot
  • From a currency to a people
  • January 24, 2020
  • Is Germany anti-semitic and racist?
  • Did the Greek financial crisis play a role in Brexit?
  • September 18, 2019
  • No doubt, this is a constitutional crisis
  • Macron's immigration bid
  • May 13, 2019
  • Brexit Party has already changed UK politics
  • Orbán visits Trump, after a very long wait
  • Le Pen's appeal to the PiS likely to fall on deaf ears
  • January 04, 2019
  • Will the AfD become the Dexit party?
  • Romania's corruption problem in the spotlight of its EU presidency
  • August 28, 2018
  • Urban politics and national crisis - the Irish case
  • How anti-semitism became one of the main issues in British politics
  • April 25, 2018
  • Macron's pitch to Trump
  • Montoro in Schleswig-Holstein
  • The old world and the new
  • December 22, 2017
  • Will Macron be the new de Gaulle?
  • 2018 through the looking glass
  • August 21, 2017
  • Soft, getting softer
  • Tsipras' chances of a boost
  • On the fallacy of a middle-ground option for the eurozone
  • April 20, 2017
  • Don’t bet on Trump turning globalist
  • A note on UK election polls
  • December 20, 2016
  • The politics of terror
  • On Lagarde
  • Is a disruptive Brexit possible?
  • August 22, 2016
  • Gold for Brexit
  • EU and Turkey talking past each other
  • Switzerland is the next migrant transit country
  • On the death of neoliberal economics
  • April 25, 2016
  • The death of the Grand Coalition
  • Insurrection against TTIP
  • Juppé to benefit from Macron hype
  • On optimal currency areas
  • Why the Artic region could be the next geopolitical troublespot
  • From a currency to a people
  • January 30, 2020
  • Trade union politics on balancing France's pension fund
  • Johnson ready to let go of frictionless trade
  • January 10, 2020
  • Why the UK is no longer seeking access to the EU’s financial market
  • December 23, 2019
  • What’s behind the NordStream2 sanctions
  • An important ruling by the Dutch constitutional court
  • This time Popolare di Bari brings EU bank resolution into question
  • The reversal of the eurozone external balances
  • No Christmas truce in France
  • Brace for Erdogan's foreign policy ambitions
  • On the decline of the centrist left
  • December 04, 2019
  • Towards a European green new deal
  • Nato summit on Turkey amid disunity
  • November 18, 2019
  • Is Macron facing another uprise against elites?
  • Forget the inflation target: Lagarde’s job is much bigger.
  • November 01, 2019
  • Beware of the fallacy of composition and hindsight bias - Brexit edition
  • October 17, 2019
  • A dangerous game for the EU
  • After Brexit, get ready for a German EU budget rebate
  • October 03, 2019
  • Goulard - after the grilling in the EP what next?
  • A market mini-crash to take seriously
  • September 20, 2019
  • Violence in Northern Ireland - not so far-fetched after all
  • German coalition fails to agree climate deal, but negotiations continue
  • September 09, 2019
  • Chances of no-deal are rising and rising
  • Resist the beginnings
  • August 27, 2019
  • Remain’s narrowing pathway
  • Macron's diplomatic masterstroke
  • August 02, 2019
  • A useful object lesson of what can go wrong for Johnson
  • Maréchal - a rising star on the French right?
  • Could Steve re-ignite the gilets jaunes?
  • July 25, 2019
  • What should the EU do now?
  • Could the grand coalition break down over defence spending?
  • July 17, 2019
  • The dreaded scenario
  • Meet the Labour no-dealers
  • July 11, 2019
  • Focus on election timetable, not prorogation...
  • ...and not on Darroch either
  • July 05, 2019
  • Why it is difficult to legislate against a no-deal Brexit
  • July 01, 2019
  • The questions we will be asking tomorrow
  • What category of diplomatic accidents is Sea Watch 3?
  • June 27, 2019
  • Why it is an illusion to think that the Commons could stop a no-deal Brexit
  • Vestager for president
  • June 24, 2019
  • Economic reform has torn up the SPD - climate policy does the same for the CDU/CSU
  • Not intruding, not really
  • June 21, 2019
  • No appetite for extension
  • Macron and Ciudadanos - an unholy alliance?
  • June 20, 2019
  • Forget the candidates and look at those who vote
  • The death of the old guard in French politics
  • When to take Salvini seriously, and when not