We use cookies to help improve and maintain our site. More information.

September 26, 2019

Could Johnson be headed for an electoral landslide?

The focus this morning is on last night’s bruising exchange in the House of Commons, which had a certain perpetrator-victim quality to it. We believe that Johnson’s rumbustious Brexit-delivery message will ultimately weigh heavier with the electorate than the near-tearful outrages over prorogation, or over his use of the term surrender bill. Johnson is the agent provocateur of modern British politics, very much in the spirit of Donald Trump but with more panache. British opposition MPs and US Democrats have a lot in common.

What we found most interesting last night was Johnson’s outright assertion of what appears to be a paradox to most British observers: that he will simultaneously comply with the Brexit-extension bill and not extend Brexit. 

This assertion is not paradoxical to us. The legislation is well drafted, but the loophole that cannot be plugged by British legislation is the European Council. UK journalists and MPs are mostly ignorant about the working of the European Council. One reported suggestion is that MPs would ask the Royal Courts of Justice to instruct a civil servant to write the extension letter. If they had read Art. 50, they would discover the total absence of any notion of a letter. If Johnson tells the European Council behind close doors that he does not want to extend, the European Council will take that as official policy, not a letter from a civil servant. The UK parliament may be critically misjudging the nature of the European Council and its willingness to collude with a parliament against a sitting prime minister - especially a prime minister who is likely to win the next elections. 

Another noteworthy aspect of Johnson's delivery last night was his attempt to co-opt Labour MPs who are minded to agree to a withdrawal agreement. He will need them if he wants to get a bill passed. 

We heard a suggestion that a withdrawal bill would definitely get a majority if it were accompanied by a pledge for a second referendum. We doubt that very much, since the Conservatives would not support a withdrawal bill under those circumstances. A majority of the recently ejected Tory rebels supports a second referendum, but the total number has not really shifted. There was always a dozen, maybe 20, diehard Tory Remainers, ready to usurp Brexit. Without the party whip, they are more likely to support a second referendum than they might have been otherwise. But their number is not higher than the number of Labour MPs who oppose it. The arithmetic has not really changed - maybe by a handful. The only way for a withdrawal agreement to pass is for the Tories to agree to it almost unanimously, and for a dozen or so Labour MPs to support it.

What about elections? Jeremy Corbyn said yesterday that Labour would agree to a general election once Johnson complies with the Brexit-extension bill. There are Labour MPs who want to frustrate an election at all cost, as they prefer a second referendum instead. If the UK ends up extending, an election is very likely if only because Corbyn cannot afford to wait much longer.

Last night’s exchange in the Commons is a foretaste of what promises to be the ugliest election campaign in British history.

We think the government may formally table a one-off general-election bill to override the fixed-term parliament act. Such a bill would set a firm date for the general election - which can still be held before end-October. If that bill is rejected, Johnson could prorogue the parliament for a second time. His powers to prorogue are not affected by the recent Supreme Court ruling. But he cannot prorogue parliament for longer than five or six days. This is why the Commons are so desperate to amend the Benn bill to bring forward the deadlines - in order not to be caught out by another prorogation.

We are not certain that Johnson is really plotting to circumvent the extension bill. He may simply be bluffing, sidetracking his opponents while he focuses on the bigger picture. 

The one big risk we see for Johnson is that his bruising strategy might unite his opponents. They were all against him yesterday, but we should not underestimate the personal animosity between Jo Swinson, the LibDem leader, and Jeremy Corbyn. Corbyn will not agree to a government of national unity except if it is led by him. She rules that out. The SNP is no friend of Johnson, and would support a government of national unity, but has its own agenda. We don’t want to rule out completely the possibility of a government of national unity, especially if Johnson were to push the process towards a no-deal Brexit.

Being displaced by a government of national unity would not necessarily be the worst for Johnson. It would get him off the hook on extension. And it would forcefully underline his message of Brexit betrayal and surrender. He wins either way.

Show Comments Write a Comment

September 26, 2019

Macron's conquest of public opinion over pension reform

Emmanuel Macron is good at turning hostile audiences around. Will he manage to do that again when he launches a debate over the pension reform tonight? 

The pension reform is not formally on the table, and yet the social mobilisation against it is gaining momentum. The trade unions battle their corners in the current extended-consultation phase. The RATP underground already announced an unlimited strike, starting October 5, while others are preparing their climax for the end of the autumn. Memories of 1995 come to mind. Then an unlimited trade unions' strike forced the government under Alain Juppé to give up on pension reform as public opinion was with the trade unions. 

This time, Macron decided to go into the battle for public opinion himself, by relaunching the grand débat. The earlier grand débat basically rescued Macron from the gilets jaunes and their outlandish demands. But this time it is about one concrete reform proposal and there is not much the government can put on the table to soften the deal. After the grand débat Macron offered €9bn in tax cuts to boost households' purchasing power. But the pension system has its own financial problems and cannot compensate the losers. So, what can Macron offer instead? Will his authority be enough to convince public opinion to back his reform? Will it be enough for him to play public opinion against the trade unions? 

The French government is currently playing for time, emphasising the need for consultation and wary of any signs of social unrest. A proposal isn't likely to be ready before the end of the year. Until then the scope and details of the reform are up in the air, to be contested, and with them the prospect of Macron can achieving a feat that his predecessors could not: a fundamental pension reform, unifying 42 pension regimes into one.

Show Comments Write a Comment

September 26, 2019

Marion Maréchal keeps dream of political comeback alive

Marion Maréchal may no longer be active in politics, but her rare appearances always get a lot of media traction. A recent Elabe poll finds that 30% consider her the best candidate for Marine Le Pen's Rassemblement National at the presidential elections in 2022. It may be too early for the 29-year old, but she keeps alive the dream of her comeback into politics. She has a different idea from her aunt abouot where she wants to stand politically. Le Pen is fishing in the same pond as Jean-Luc Mélenchon, on the left. Maréchal by contrast fancies the reconstruction of the right, centered on the RN. 

Much commented is her regular contact with Eric Zemmour, a popular writer and journalist known for his anti-liberal and anti-immigration positions and his book the French suicide. This Saturday they will appear together in public for the second time. As the right is recomposing itself after Les Républicains' disastrous results at the European elections, there seems to be a clear desire to steal the leadership for the right from LR. Le Nouvel Observateur now speculates whether the two could emerge as a team for the next presidential elections, with either Maréchal or the much older Zemmour offered up as the candidate. 

Show Comments Write a Comment

This is the public section of the Eurointelligence Professional Briefing, which focuses on the geopolitical aspects of our news coverage. It appears daily at 2pm CET. The full briefing, which appears at 9am CET, is only available to subscribers. Please click here for a free trial, and here for the Eurointelligence home page.


Recent News

  • November 12, 2019
  • How the Catalan question poisoned Spanish politics
  • A renaissance for minority governments?
  • November 04, 2019
  • Brexit tactical voting is happening - on both sides
  • Merkel promises 1m charging stations - but doesn't tell us how
  • October 27, 2019
  • German political centre is melting
  • Train drivers in all-out confrontation with Macron
  • Erdogan makes threats again
  • October 21, 2019
  • Philippe to brace for more union protests
  • Greens are the electorates' new favourite
  • October 14, 2019
  • What is Turkey's medium-term game?
  • Germany sabotages EIB climate change policies
  • October 07, 2019
  • What did Conte know?
  • October 03, 2019
  • Goulard - after the grilling in the EP what next?
  • A market mini-crash to take seriously
  • September 30, 2019
  • A pyrrhic victory for Kurz
  • Will there really be UK elections?
  • September 27, 2019
  • Watch out for the shifting politics of Brexit