We use cookies to help improve and maintain our site. More information.
close

October 04, 2019

Is the EU about to make its first serious error in the Brexit process?

We are at a dangerous point in the Brexit process - where at least some people are about to make big mistakes. The number of mistakes made by various UK prime ministers and MPs has been amply documented. But we think that the EU is now at risk of a big tactical miscalculation due to an insufficient understanding of UK politics. We see the early signs of this happening as a result of the flat-out rejection of Boris Johnson’s proposal. We agree that there are many problems with the proposal, including giving Stormont a veto. But the proposal is solid enough as a starting bid, for which it was designed.

The EU could inadvertently trigger a no-deal Brexit. At the moment, the consensus in Brussels is that a Brexit extension is certain, so that there is no real hard deadline. Fraser Nelson, the editor of the Spectator and who knows Johnson well, writes in the Telegraph this morning that the prime minister privately says that he will probably have to extend. So game, set and match for the EU?

We would agree that the risk of a no-deal Brexit on October 31 is vanishingly small, but risk of it happening eventually is rising. At Eurointelligence we have been warning for some time that the risks of a no-deal Brexit have been widely underestimated. But we were cautious not to elevate the no-deal scenario to becoming our baseline. 

If the EU were to reject the current proposal flat out, that would change. The EU should consider very carefully that Johnson yesterday managed to receive support not only from the DUP, but also from the rebel Tories who lost their whip over the Benn extension legislation. The EU does not want to give Johnson a believable excuse for a no-deal Brexit: having come up with a reasonable proposal whose rejections indicates that the EU was not serious even to engage with the idea of a dual border - one for customs and one for regulation. We think that duality is not only a reasonable starting position, but in fact the only way to bridge the differences over the backstop. Once we pass the October 31 deadline, Johnson would then campaign on a theme of no-deal Brexit. That position could command a majority at that point, especially in view of Labour’s confused position. 

The reaction from Dublin to Boris Johnson's proposal was firm but without shutting doors. The major objections against the plan remain - customs union and the veto right of Northern Ireland. But in coordination with Brussels the Irish government put out the message that Johnson's proposals are not the basis of a deal, but the basis for discussions. Their expectation is that there will be an extension followed by an election which will give both sides time to work on this proposal for an agreeable compromise. 

Are the difficulties surmountable? Dublin would find it very hard to agree a deal involving checks on goods moving between North and South. And, while it would likely concede some role for the parliament in Stormont, the Irish government views a veto for the DUP as unsellable domestically, writes the Irish Times.

Is it possible that the EU secretly speculates on a second referendum? We think this would also be a miscalculation. But the more important point is that without a deal there can be no referendum - unless the EU wants to pitch Remain vs. no-deal. We disagree with Leo Varadkar’s optimism that Remain would win.

In any case, there is no majority in the UK parliament in favour of a referendum.

Is it possible that the EU is sceptical of Johnson’s proposals, not only because of the backstop but because of a general reluctance to accept regulatory divergence? If so, that position would validate the fears expressed in the UK about the backstop - that the EU would seek to trap the UK in an arrangement that allows no escape. The EU should therefore clarify within itself the ultimate goal of its position, rather than just hide behind Dublin. Do they want to avoid a no-deal Brexit to minimise disruption? Or do they want to stop regulatory divergence? There are overlapping, but not identical strategies to achieve those goals. This is also where the difference in views between France and Germany lies. The Germans are seeking to avoid disruption, but are not afraid of competition. Emmanuel Macron is not afraid of disruption, but very afraid of competition. 

We would agree that the Johnson plan has big problems, especially the part that gives Stormont veto power. And it remains to be seen whether the unity in the UK parliament would still hold if this aspect were negotiated away. But in our view it would be a miscalculation for the EU to reject the principle of separate borders for regulation and customs. If there is a solution to the backstop problem, it must be organised around this principle. It is also important to keep things in perspective. The amount of trade between the UK and the EU was over £600bn. Intra-Irish trade flows were about £5bn. Should the EU really want to endanger a large portion of the £600bn on the grounds that it is possible to blame Johnson for a no-deal Brexit? 

That would strike us as an entirely irrational strategy.

Show Comments Write a Comment

October 04, 2019

Socialists on track to win elections in Portugal

Portugal is going to elect its next government this Sunday. The latest polls suggest the Socialists will win the elections but without an outright majority. Unlike everywhere else in Europe Portugal is an island of political stability, with the Socialists in a minority government backed by the Left Bloc and the Communists in parliament. This deal that was ridiculed initially as unmanageable and yet it lasted through the entire legislative period. And the success was tangible too: the economy stabilised, austerity ended after years under the bailout programme, and confidence returned. This success is why António Costa and his party are likely to return to office even if they will have to rely on other parties again. 

But controversies came up during the campaign that cost the Socialists the extra points which could have enabled an outright majority. The most damaging was the scandal about the theft from a weapons depot in the town of Tancos, which implicated Costa's defence minister in an alleged cover-up. The media coverage of the case pushed security issues to the forefront in the public debate, and thus helped the conservative PSD party to gain in the polls. As a consequence the gap between the two parties narrowed from 18pp in August to 10pp now. Still, the latest polls suggest that the Socialists would get 37%-38% of the vote, enough to win though not to form a government without a partner. 

Will there be a coalition government? The current set up is a minority government backed in parliament by an agreement with the Left Bloc and Communists. Both of those two parties are stable in the polls around 10% and 7%. This basically offers two options: a re-run of the current arrangements, or a deal with the Left Bloc alone. All depends on the election arithmetic and the list of concessions the parties will bring to the negotiation.

Show Comments Write a Comment

This is the public section of the Eurointelligence Professional Briefing, which focuses on the geopolitical aspects of our news coverage. It appears daily at 2pm CET. The full briefing, which appears at 9am CET, is only available to subscribers. Please click here for a free trial, and here for the Eurointelligence home page.

 

Recent News

  • January 22, 2020
  • Erdogan and European Libya diplomacy
  • On the importance of mutual recognition agreements in the Brexit trade talks
  • September 17, 2019
  • Beware of the diplomacy of humiliation
  • Germany’s climate hypocrisy
  • May 10, 2019
  • Target2 debate raises legitimate questions with unsatisfactory answers
  • No more German questions please
  • January 04, 2019
  • Will the AfD become the Dexit party?
  • Romania's corruption problem in the spotlight of its EU presidency
  • August 28, 2018
  • Urban politics and national crisis - the Irish case
  • How anti-semitism became one of the main issues in British politics
  • April 23, 2018
  • More bad news for the SPD
  • Will Theresa May accept a customs union? The Times says yes. We think so too.
  • A comeback for Marine Le Pen?
  • December 21, 2017
  • Catalonia votes
  • A deputy prime minister resigns
  • Will Gibraltar result in another Irish fudge?
  • Blood, sweat and tears
  • August 21, 2017
  • Soft, getting softer
  • Tsipras' chances of a boost
  • On the fallacy of a middle-ground option for the eurozone
  • April 19, 2017
  • Shadows of money
  • Breppe Grillo vs Eurointelligence
  • December 19, 2016
  • Inside the customs union, outside the single market
  • Back to the future in Italy
  • The lessons from Fillon's first gaffe
  • Montebourg - a bit of everything
  • The Maastricht error
  • If Paul Romer is right...
  • August 22, 2016
  • Gold for Brexit
  • EU and Turkey talking past each other
  • Switzerland is the next migrant transit country
  • On the death of neoliberal economics
  • April 25, 2016
  • The death of the Grand Coalition
  • Insurrection against TTIP
  • Juppé to benefit from Macron hype
  • On optimal currency areas
  • Why the Artic region could be the next geopolitical troublespot
  • From a currency to a people
  • February 19, 2020
  • Degrowth isn't enough to stem climate change
  • Is Renzi finished?
  • Welcome to Germany, Tesla
  • February 04, 2020
  • A glimmer of hope on EU/UK trade
  • January 20, 2020
  • The EU in a diplomatic bear hug
  • French pension strikes come to a halt as violence grows
  • Scholz to stick to fiscal surplus in 2021
  • January 06, 2020
  • A decade that started with a bang
  • What to expect of Spain's next government
  • Divide et impera: Macron's pension reform strategy
  • December 23, 2019
  • What’s behind the NordStream2 sanctions
  • An important ruling by the Dutch constitutional court
  • This time Popolare di Bari brings EU bank resolution into question
  • The reversal of the eurozone external balances
  • No Christmas truce in France
  • Brace for Erdogan's foreign policy ambitions
  • On the decline of the centrist left
  • December 10, 2019
  • Squeezed between US and Russia - Open Skies edition
  • November 29, 2019
  • Macron is doubling down on his Nato stance
  • France accuses Europeans of free riding in the Sahel
  • Beware of the empty chair
  • November 19, 2019
  • Not the time to bet against the Franco-German relationship
  • German employers and union united against the debt brake
  • November 11, 2019
  • Grand coalition agrees to continue grand coalition
  • Can Greens and conservatives agree on priorities?
  • Germany - self-content and without energy
  • November 04, 2019
  • Brexit tactical voting is happening - on both sides
  • Merkel promises 1m charging stations - but doesn't tell us how
  • October 27, 2019
  • German political centre is melting
  • Train drivers in all-out confrontation with Macron
  • Erdogan makes threats again
  • October 21, 2019
  • Philippe to brace for more union protests
  • Greens are the electorates' new favourite
  • October 15, 2019
  • Germany chooses Huawei for 5G
  • US and EU respond to Turkey - too little, too late
  • October 11, 2019
  • Referendum numbers are edging up - slowly
  • Goulard's foreboding rejection
  • Turkey advances in Syria and threatens Europe
  • October 09, 2019
  • A final push for a deal
  • Costa mandated to form government
  • October 07, 2019
  • What did Conte know?
  • October 04, 2019
  • Is the EU about to make its first serious error in the Brexit process?
  • Socialists on track to win elections in Portugal