We use cookies to help improve and maintain our site. More information.

October 09, 2019

A final push for a deal

There are two developments in the Brexit negotiations to look out for. After yesterday’s telephone call between Angela Merkel and Boris Johnson, the British PM will meet Leo Varadkar tomorrow to explore whether his proposed withdrawal agreement is at least negotiable - we presume it is, once you take the Stormont veto off the table. 

We think it is not helpful to speculate on what Merkel may or may not have said. Nor do we think that Donald Tusk’s tweets have been helpful. You cannot simultaneously complain about politicians resorting to a blame game, and then blame the other side.

As the negotiations in Brussels have now halted, Johnson and Leo Varadkar will attempt another, final round of talks tomorrow. If they break down, we will be heading towards an extension on October 31 - preceded by noise, legal challenges, and who knows, maybe an accident or an unforeseen event along the way. Our baseline remind an extension, followed by a UK election won by the Tories. We have been more cautious than others on the likelihood of an early election. See also our electoral analysis story below. The Telegraph columnist Philip Johnston also believes that an early election should not be taken for granted, given that a second referendum would be much more advantageous for Remain supporters. And in reality it would have to be done outside the scope of the fixed term parliaments act, for example through a dedicated bill.

Hillary Benn, the author of the Brexit extension bill, said last night that the House of Commons will push for a second referendum possibly next week. He said he was not sure whether it would have a majority, we don’t think that the maths we presented in a recent article has shifted sufficiently in favour of a second referendum. Another issue with the second referendum is what question to put in to the voters in the absence of a deal - Remain vs what exactly? Remain vs no-deal? There is a logic in Jeremy Corbyn to negotiate a deal and then put it to a referendum. You need a credible leave option. 

Benn’s own extension bill makes the prospect of a majority in favour of the second referendum less likely because the pressure is off. This is the trouble with extensions. They resolve nothing. 

Both the Times and the Guardian report this morning that EU ambassadors were already discussing, and disagreeing on, the length of an extension. Some are arguing for a very long extension, a prospect we consider ill-advised and likely to backfire. We believe that the persistent moralistic intervention by Tusk has strengthened the Brexit camp in the UK. The more you push, the bigger the push-back.

The Times writes that one influential government is calling for a very short extension to force the issue one way or the other. 

We presume, but cannot be certain, that this is France and/or Spain. We think there is a logic in a three-month extension, as it would allow the UK to hold elections.

Extension is becoming unpopular in the EU. The Times reports on a poll taken in six EU countries, in which a large majority disagreed with an extension. The Guardian writes that an outlier view in Brussels was for an extension all the way to the next general election in 2022, while some governments preferred the summer of next year. Those that favour a long extension include Tusk. 

There is a logical connection between next week’s attempt in the UK parliament to seek a majority for a second referendum, and the EU discussion on extension. If next week’s attempt fails, or is postponed, the argument for a long extension will be harder to win in the European Council. If the UK parliament does not have a majority in favour of a second referendum, then the only political way out is another general election - with an extension tailored to it. 

It is the prospect that Johnson might win those elections outright that is now pushing back against that scenario. 

Show Comments Write a Comment

October 09, 2019

Costa mandated to form government

Officially mandated by the Portuguese president to form a government, António Costa will meet up with five parties today - the two partners of the previous term, Left bloc and Communists, as well as three smaller parties. A rerun of the last agreement is officially still the preferred scenario, eventually to be extended with the inclusion of the two smaller parties Pan and Livre. But the Communists already signalled they would prefer to stay out of a strategic alliance this time, since they lost votes and seats. They prefer to support the Socialists only on a case-by-case basis.  

A variable majority on a case-by-case basis with no formal partner is indeed one option for Costa. Such a minority government is possible though there is no guarantee that it can last four years. Portugal's last conservative government only lasted 11 days! In theory Costa would need ten more MPs for an absolute majority. The advantage of a minority government would allow him to open up to other partners such as the conservatives. With a clear majority on the left, Costa is safe from any insurrection of the right against him. The downside is that the socialists would be locked into negotiations with potential allies for each piece of legislation almost all the time, which might create animosities between the partners. 

This is why Costa is seeking a formal agreement. Costa could try and strike a deal with the Left Bloc alone. Together they have 125 MPs. Two smaller parties with 1 and 4 seats respectively might also join. Compared to 2015, Costa has more negotiating power this time as he has 106 seats. It remains to be seen how well the Left Bloc respond to that. Some of their spending demands may well be incompatible with Costa's fiscal caps. 

As the president was quick to nominate Costa as prime minister, it will now be up to legislators to decide on the new government's programme, which must be presented within ten days. If parliament decides to vote on it and it is rejected, the government could collapse. Neither the president nor any observers expect this to happen.

Show Comments Write a Comment

This is the public section of the Eurointelligence Professional Briefing, which focuses on the geopolitical aspects of our news coverage. It appears daily at 2pm CET. The full briefing, which appears at 9am CET, is only available to subscribers. Please click here for a free trial, and here for the Eurointelligence home page.


Recent News

  • December 02, 2019
  • Will pension reform protests spiral out of control?
  • Malta's PM resigns over murder case
  • April 24, 2019
  • May's final and biggest gamble
  • Will the EP be Brexit's great parliamentary beneficiary?
  • Can Loiseau fight the far right given her past?
  • September 12, 2018
  • It is easy to criticise Chequers but very hard to come up with an alternative
  • February 05, 2018
  • How big is Germany's external surplus, really?
  • Macron's first election test
  • Coeure's endorsement of a fiscal union
  • July 03, 2017
  • Can Greece exit its programme without a credit line?
  • The softening Brexit
  • Macron's state of the nation address
  • November 28, 2016
  • And now what Monsieur Fillion?
  • The inescapable logic of an interim agreement
  • On Germany's foreign policy post-Trump
  • How to lose against the populists
  • April 25, 2016
  • The death of the Grand Coalition
  • Insurrection against TTIP
  • Juppé to benefit from Macron hype
  • On optimal currency areas
  • Why the Artic region could be the next geopolitical troublespot
  • From a currency to a people
  • March 16, 2020
  • Why many of the Covid-19 statistics are misleading
  • September 17, 2019
  • Beware of the diplomacy of humiliation
  • Germany’s climate hypocrisy
  • March 18, 2019
  • May's deal still on the table. Don't rule it out.
  • EPP decision on Fidesz still open
  • On the defeat of liberalism
  • September 21, 2018
  • SPD ministers want to continue grand coalition
  • March 28, 2018
  • The real reason for the sanctions against Russia
  • Wishful thinking: Brexit edition
  • Wishful thinking: Future of euro edition
  • Wishful thinking: Italy edition
  • October 02, 2017
  • Catalonia recalls EU and eurozone instability
  • French trade unions increase pressure over labour reforms
  • Watch out for a political accident in the UK
  • Municipal elections boost Portugal's Socialists
  • April 10, 2017
  • Nein, nein, nein, und nein
  • Sounds like a bad Brexit story, but ain’t
  • On how not to exit the euro
  • October 17, 2016
  • Ceta is dead for now
  • L’après-Hollande, c'est Hollande
  • SPD against Russia sanctions
  • Nissan to join customs union and other fanciful tales
  • April 25, 2016
  • The death of the Grand Coalition
  • Insurrection against TTIP
  • Juppé to benefit from Macron hype
  • On optimal currency areas
  • Why the Artic region could be the next geopolitical troublespot
  • From a currency to a people
  • May 29, 2020
  • Why it is not €500bn
  • Is reshoring the answer to this pandemic?
  • January 22, 2020
  • Erdogan and European Libya diplomacy
  • On the importance of mutual recognition agreements in the Brexit trade talks
  • September 17, 2019
  • Beware of the diplomacy of humiliation
  • Germany’s climate hypocrisy
  • May 10, 2019
  • Target2 debate raises legitimate questions with unsatisfactory answers
  • No more German questions please
  • January 04, 2019
  • Will the AfD become the Dexit party?
  • Romania's corruption problem in the spotlight of its EU presidency
  • August 28, 2018
  • Urban politics and national crisis - the Irish case
  • How anti-semitism became one of the main issues in British politics
  • April 23, 2018
  • More bad news for the SPD
  • Will Theresa May accept a customs union? The Times says yes. We think so too.
  • A comeback for Marine Le Pen?
  • December 21, 2017
  • Catalonia votes
  • A deputy prime minister resigns
  • Will Gibraltar result in another Irish fudge?
  • Blood, sweat and tears
  • August 21, 2017
  • Soft, getting softer
  • Tsipras' chances of a boost
  • On the fallacy of a middle-ground option for the eurozone
  • April 19, 2017
  • Shadows of money
  • Breppe Grillo vs Eurointelligence
  • December 19, 2016
  • Inside the customs union, outside the single market
  • Back to the future in Italy
  • The lessons from Fillon's first gaffe
  • Montebourg - a bit of everything
  • The Maastricht error
  • If Paul Romer is right...
  • August 22, 2016
  • Gold for Brexit
  • EU and Turkey talking past each other
  • Switzerland is the next migrant transit country
  • On the death of neoliberal economics
  • April 25, 2016
  • The death of the Grand Coalition
  • Insurrection against TTIP
  • Juppé to benefit from Macron hype
  • On optimal currency areas
  • Why the Artic region could be the next geopolitical troublespot
  • From a currency to a people
  • May 18, 2020
  • Why this won't be a symmetric shock
  • Towards a new cold war
  • April 27, 2020
  • The EU’s trickery of a fake MFF
  • Philippe to put down cards as trust evaporates
  • April 07, 2020
  • Austria and Denmark - first to exit after Easter
  • All change in the UK
  • Eastern Europe’s unnoticed economic shock
  • March 20, 2020
  • Eurozone faces second major crisis
  • Despite Brexit, Germany and UK are quite similar in the crisis response
  • March 04, 2020
  • Why the Covid-19 numbers in Italy are rising faster than elsewhere
  • February 17, 2020
  • Security issues we should be discussing
  • Salvini has changed his mind on the euro - yet again
  • February 02, 2020
  • Is Sinn Fein the Irish anti-establishment vote?
  • Don’t assume that nobody will follow the Brits
  • January 20, 2020
  • The EU in a diplomatic bear hug
  • French pension strikes come to a halt as violence grows
  • Scholz to stick to fiscal surplus in 2021
  • January 06, 2020
  • A decade that started with a bang
  • What to expect of Spain's next government
  • Divide et impera: Macron's pension reform strategy
  • December 16, 2019
  • What the failure in Madrid says about multilateral governance
  • December 05, 2019
  • A Nato soap opera
  • Germany’s Skripal affair
  • November 25, 2019
  • Twenty years on - and less safe than ever
  • Philippe's last round of talks ahead of strike actions
  • November 14, 2019
  • Are France and Germany finally converging on security policy? We think they might.
  • November 06, 2019
  • Could the German coalition fall over the basis minimum pension? Quite possibly.
  • Philippe to present new immigration policies
  • The sharp edge of soft power
  • October 31, 2019
  • Meet Workington Man
  • NordStream 2 get final go-ahead
  • October 25, 2019
  • We should listen to what Mario Draghi is saying about the future of the euro
  • Kurz focusses on Greens after other parties dropped out
  • Is sustainable investment just a matter of deepening capital markets?
  • October 21, 2019
  • Philippe to brace for more union protests
  • Greens are the electorates' new favourite
  • October 16, 2019
  • After Goulard, von der Leyen needs to show leadership
  • Franco-German relations are so backward-looking
  • October 14, 2019
  • What is Turkey's medium-term game?
  • Germany sabotages EIB climate change policies
  • October 10, 2019
  • What if UK parliament rejects both elections and the second referendum?
  • Should Europeans really look forward to President Warren?
  • October 09, 2019
  • A final push for a deal
  • Costa mandated to form government