We use cookies to help improve and maintain our site. More information.

October 18, 2019

The horrifying implications of Merkel’s 5G decision

After our note on Angela Merkel’s unilateral decision to allow Huawei full access to the German 5G markets, we saw an interesting comment by François Godement, a French historian and China expert. We focused on Germany’s vulnerability after years of underinvestment in telecommunications technology, which left Merkel with no realistic choice but to accept Huawei. But Godement looks at the impact of her decision - uncoordinated as ever - on the rest of the EU.

The first point Godement makes is that the decision renders the entire independent EU risk assessment effort of the threats to cybersecurity null and void. This was the process the EU had agreed to follow. Secondly, Merkel is now opening the doors to other EU member states to do likewise, and thus destroys any hope of building up a European alternative. We find it interesting that the US is subsidising Huawei’s two main European competitors, Nokia and Ericsson, which means that these two companies are now effectively American. And third, consider the impact on other sectors. This decision will worsen the EU’s leverage in every direction. The national interest argument will rule in industrial policy.

We agree with Godement, and arrive at a similar pessimistic conclusion. The real danger to the EU is not a formal breakup, but over-dependence on others, lack of investment, and loss of technological leadership. European countries had ownership of the key technologies of the 20th century. But they are industrial niche players in the 21st. 

Show Comments Write a Comment

This is the public section of the Eurointelligence Professional Briefing, which focuses on the geopolitical aspects of our news coverage. It appears daily at 2pm CET. The full briefing, which appears at 9am CET, is only available to subscribers. Please click here for a free trial, and here for the Eurointelligence home page.


Recent News

  • January 06, 2020
  • A decade that started with a bang
  • What to expect of Spain's next government
  • Divide et impera: Macron's pension reform strategy
  • December 16, 2019
  • What the failure in Madrid says about multilateral governance
  • December 04, 2019
  • Towards a European green new deal
  • Nato summit on Turkey amid disunity
  • November 25, 2019
  • Twenty years on - and less safe than ever
  • Philippe's last round of talks ahead of strike actions
  • November 18, 2019
  • Is Macron facing another uprise against elites?
  • Forget the inflation target: Lagarde’s job is much bigger.
  • November 11, 2019
  • Grand coalition agrees to continue grand coalition
  • Can Greens and conservatives agree on priorities?
  • Germany - self-content and without energy
  • November 04, 2019
  • Brexit tactical voting is happening - on both sides
  • Merkel promises 1m charging stations - but doesn't tell us how
  • October 29, 2019
  • People's Vote descends into Civil War
  • CDU at odds on dealing with extreme parties
  • October 25, 2019
  • We should listen to what Mario Draghi is saying about the future of the euro
  • Kurz focusses on Greens after other parties dropped out
  • Is sustainable investment just a matter of deepening capital markets?
  • October 22, 2019
  • High stake poker with Turkey
  • Without EU accession prospect, what is at stake for Macedonia?
  • October 21, 2019
  • Philippe to brace for more union protests
  • Greens are the electorates' new favourite