We use cookies to help improve and maintain our site. More information.

October 23, 2019

Putin brokers deal to push Kurds away from border

The agreement between Recep Tayyip Erdogan and Vladimir Putin cements two things: it pushes Kurdish forces out of the 440km-long Syrian border area with Turkey and it installs Russia as the de facto power broker in the region. According to the agreement Kurdish forces will have a 150-hour window to retreat from a 30km-deep corridor along the Turkish border, starting at midnight tonight until October 29. Russian military police and Syrian border guards are to oversee the Kurdish retreat, while Turkish forces stay in place without further advances. After October 29, Russia and Turkey will patrol a 10km strip along the whole 440km border with the exception of Qamishli, the de facto Kurdish capital. This buffer zone appears to include the two strategically-important towns of Kobani and Manbij. 

What are the quid-pro-quo's? Turkey got its safe zone and control over it. In return Turkey is to respect Syria’s sovereignty and territorial integrity, an important concession Putin brokered for his ally Bashar al-Assad. What this means for the Idlib province, where Turkey maintains observation posts, is not clear yet. It is also not clear to us what it means for Erdogan's plans to resettle Syrian refugees. And nowhere in the declaration is anything said about the Isis prison camps. 

There are no comments yet from the Kurds. Earlier during the day the army commander in Kobani confirmed that fighters retreated from the border strip between Tal Abyad and Ras al-Ayn just hours before the US-brokered ceasefire ended. Amid the Turkish operation and the US retreat, the Kurds were forced to seek the protection of the hated dictator Assad, who gets his grip on land that used to be under Kurdish authority. The Kurds are screwed over again, it seems. 

Show Comments Write a Comment

October 23, 2019

AKK’s biggest gamble yet

AKK has done it again. She surprised everybody with a proposal of far-reaching military and strategic implications by making the case for a UN-policed protection zone in northern Syria. The last time she did something like this was before she became German defence minister. Readers may remember she suggested a joint Franco-German aircraft carrier, and that France give up on seat on the UN security council.

We agree with the assessment of Berthold Kohler of FAZ: this is a make-or-break moment for her. If this were to get under way, it would be a big step for German diplomacy and for her personally. But if this fails, her party will invariably come to the conclusion that she cannot conceivably succeed Angela Merkel as chancellor. In that case, her job as CDU leader would also be in doubt.

Another article in FAZ tells us that she plotted her proposal within her ministry and in close co-ordination with Merkel’s foreign policy advisers but, crucially, not with the SPD. A UN-led mission to police Northern Syria would require some 30,000-40,000 ground troops. An operation of that scale would have to include German troops. Merkel yesterday said she finds the idea of a UN mission promising. But Heiko Maas, Germany’s foreign minister, accused AKK of doing diplomacy by text message. We also wonder whether the decision might become an issue in the present SPD leadership race and in the party’s upcoming internal review of the coalition. We think the SPD will want to sit out the remaining time in office as they always do, but one should never underestimate how defence issues can develop their own political dynamism in Germany. 

AKK said she had some positive responses from Russia and also from Turkey. The Kurds support the idea. Merkel said she wanted to consult with Boris Johnson and Emmanuel Macron.

Wolfgang Munchau writes: I welcome the idea of a more assertive and more strategic security policy. Based on its merits, AKK’s proposal has a lot going for it. The EU has an overwhelming interest in preventing a further de-stabilisation of the region. But the political job does not consist of arriving at that conclusion but in organising majorities for it - like Joschka Fischer did in 1999 when he persuaded the Green’s party congress to accept German participation of a UN-led mission to Kosovo.

So why has she not tried to seek broader support for the idea inside her coalition? I can see two rational reasons: she is either deliberating trying to provoke the SPD to pull out of the coalition; or she is convinced that the SPD will follow because it has no alternative choice. But it is also possible that she miscalculated. Given her record, I just cannot exclude the latter.

Show Comments Write a Comment

This is the public section of the Eurointelligence Professional Briefing, which focuses on the geopolitical aspects of our news coverage. It appears daily at 2pm CET. The full briefing, which appears at 9am CET, is only available to subscribers. Please click here for a free trial, and here for the Eurointelligence home page.


Recent News

  • August 22, 2016
  • Gold for Brexit
  • EU and Turkey talking past each other
  • Switzerland is the next migrant transit country
  • On the death of neoliberal economics
  • April 25, 2016
  • The death of the Grand Coalition
  • Insurrection against TTIP
  • Juppé to benefit from Macron hype
  • On optimal currency areas
  • Why the Artic region could be the next geopolitical troublespot
  • From a currency to a people
  • February 17, 2020
  • Security issues we should be discussing
  • Salvini has changed his mind on the euro - yet again
  • February 02, 2020
  • Is Sinn Fein the Irish anti-establishment vote?
  • Don’t assume that nobody will follow the Brits
  • January 20, 2020
  • The EU in a diplomatic bear hug
  • French pension strikes come to a halt as violence grows
  • Scholz to stick to fiscal surplus in 2021
  • January 06, 2020
  • A decade that started with a bang
  • What to expect of Spain's next government
  • Divide et impera: Macron's pension reform strategy
  • December 16, 2019
  • What the failure in Madrid says about multilateral governance
  • December 04, 2019
  • Towards a European green new deal
  • Nato summit on Turkey amid disunity
  • November 25, 2019
  • Twenty years on - and less safe than ever
  • Philippe's last round of talks ahead of strike actions
  • November 18, 2019
  • Is Macron facing another uprise against elites?
  • Forget the inflation target: Lagarde’s job is much bigger.
  • November 11, 2019
  • Grand coalition agrees to continue grand coalition
  • Can Greens and conservatives agree on priorities?
  • Germany - self-content and without energy
  • November 05, 2019
  • Grassroot movements and a new era of instability
  • October 31, 2019
  • Meet Workington Man
  • NordStream 2 get final go-ahead
  • October 27, 2019
  • German political centre is melting
  • Train drivers in all-out confrontation with Macron
  • Erdogan makes threats again
  • October 25, 2019
  • We should listen to what Mario Draghi is saying about the future of the euro
  • Kurz focusses on Greens after other parties dropped out
  • Is sustainable investment just a matter of deepening capital markets?
  • October 24, 2019
  • Will the Bundestag stop Merkel's 5G unilateralism?
  • October 23, 2019
  • Putin brokers deal to push Kurds away from border
  • AKK’s biggest gamble yet