We use cookies to help improve and maintain our site. More information.
close

November 19, 2019

Not the time to bet against the Franco-German relationship

There is no place on earth where the Franco-German relationship is less understood than in London. The UK is not, and never has been, an arbiter of diverging Franco-German interests. Brexit will not change it in one direction or the other. And you will always find French and German officials who can’t stand each other. What has pulled the two countries together since the 1950s are joint interests. 

Commentators have declared the relationship dead time and again because they have not seen it in action. There are long periods during which it was dormant - for example during the era of Willy Brand and Georges Pompidou, the early period of Jacques Chirac, and now the late period of Angela Merkel. It has a punctuated history.

If the grand coalition - and Merkel - are replaced in 2021, or earlier, there is a chance of a reconnection in that relationship. This would be on the basis of more German investments to meet climate targets and defence spending commitments. We recently noted convergence on defence spending in comments by Emmanuel Macron and Annegret Kramp-Karrenbauer. France and Germany have traditionally different perspectives on Nato, but the future of Nato is not decided by either country. The US will determine the extent to which Nato is effective. The fact that AKK and Macron used different adjectives to describe NATO is also immaterial. What matters more is that they both want to strengthen European defence, and that AKK is ready to invest political capital in this process. 

Germany has partially softened its opposition to EU-wide deposit insurance. We also note that there is a debate in full swing on the German debt brake - see our separate story below. There is a long way to go until Germany accepts the institutional changes necessary for the eurozone to succeed in the long run. We make no predictions, but would caution against another premature dismissal of the Franco-German relationship.

Show Comments Write a Comment

November 19, 2019

German employers and union united against the debt brake

We have characterised the German debt brake as the worst economic decision any G7 country has undertaken in our lifetimes. It is the reason why during the 2011-2013 period the eurozone adopted synchronised austerity, which almost led to its collapse. It drove up massive imbalances within the eurozone, and between the eurozone and the rest of the world. But Germany itself is the biggest victim of that policy. It has resulted in large and structural under-investment. And that is now becoming probably the biggest single driver for political change in the country. 

Yesterday we noted the emergence of an unprecedented coalition: among employers and trade unions against a government that includes the SPD. The two social partners have issued a joint study by their aligned economic institutes to show that the country is short nearly half a trillion euros' worth of investment. What is extraordinary apart from the large number are the authors of that report. For the IW institute to ask for more government spending is a big deal, and a sign of shifting positions within German society. 

Business leaders were among the biggest fanboys of the debt brake until they realised that the lack of infrastructure investment is hitting them most of all. The two institutes came up with a list of €457bn the German government needs to invest in the following categories. We took the following summary from Adam Tooze (@Adam_Tooze): 

  • 75bn decarbonization
  • 20bn 5G
  • 60bn rail
  • 20bn autobahn
  • 15bn housing  
  • 59bn school & university
  • 50bn early childhood
  • 158bn local government

One argument made by Michael Hüther of the IW is that the low rates of interest present a unique opportunity for a debt-financed investment programme. The response by Olaf Scholz is that the government was doing precisely that - citing figures of a €550bn investment programme over the next few years. But these headline numbers belie a reality of much lower investments in practice, with allocated funds not used up. We don’t believe the argument of the finance ministry that there are capacity constraints in the German economy - if only because it is up to them to solve the problem by giving incentives to companies from all over the EU to bid for lucrative Germaan contracts.

Show Comments Write a Comment

This is the public section of the Eurointelligence Professional Briefing, which focuses on the geopolitical aspects of our news coverage. It appears daily at 2pm CET. The full briefing, which appears at 9am CET, is only available to subscribers. Please click here for a free trial, and here for the Eurointelligence home page.

 

Recent News

  • March 16, 2020
  • Why many of the Covid-19 statistics are misleading
  • September 17, 2019
  • Beware of the diplomacy of humiliation
  • Germany’s climate hypocrisy
  • March 18, 2019
  • May's deal still on the table. Don't rule it out.
  • EPP decision on Fidesz still open
  • On the defeat of liberalism
  • September 21, 2018
  • SPD ministers want to continue grand coalition
  • March 28, 2018
  • The real reason for the sanctions against Russia
  • Wishful thinking: Brexit edition
  • Wishful thinking: Future of euro edition
  • Wishful thinking: Italy edition
  • October 02, 2017
  • Catalonia recalls EU and eurozone instability
  • French trade unions increase pressure over labour reforms
  • Watch out for a political accident in the UK
  • Municipal elections boost Portugal's Socialists
  • April 10, 2017
  • Nein, nein, nein, und nein
  • Sounds like a bad Brexit story, but ain’t
  • On how not to exit the euro
  • October 17, 2016
  • Ceta is dead for now
  • L’après-Hollande, c'est Hollande
  • SPD against Russia sanctions
  • Nissan to join customs union and other fanciful tales
  • April 25, 2016
  • The death of the Grand Coalition
  • Insurrection against TTIP
  • Juppé to benefit from Macron hype
  • On optimal currency areas
  • Why the Artic region could be the next geopolitical troublespot
  • From a currency to a people
  • May 29, 2020
  • Why it is not €500bn
  • Is reshoring the answer to this pandemic?
  • January 22, 2020
  • Erdogan and European Libya diplomacy
  • On the importance of mutual recognition agreements in the Brexit trade talks
  • September 17, 2019
  • Beware of the diplomacy of humiliation
  • Germany’s climate hypocrisy
  • May 10, 2019
  • Target2 debate raises legitimate questions with unsatisfactory answers
  • No more German questions please
  • January 04, 2019
  • Will the AfD become the Dexit party?
  • Romania's corruption problem in the spotlight of its EU presidency
  • August 28, 2018
  • Urban politics and national crisis - the Irish case
  • How anti-semitism became one of the main issues in British politics
  • April 23, 2018
  • More bad news for the SPD
  • Will Theresa May accept a customs union? The Times says yes. We think so too.
  • A comeback for Marine Le Pen?
  • December 21, 2017
  • Catalonia votes
  • A deputy prime minister resigns
  • Will Gibraltar result in another Irish fudge?
  • Blood, sweat and tears
  • August 21, 2017
  • Soft, getting softer
  • Tsipras' chances of a boost
  • On the fallacy of a middle-ground option for the eurozone
  • April 19, 2017
  • Shadows of money
  • Breppe Grillo vs Eurointelligence
  • December 19, 2016
  • Inside the customs union, outside the single market
  • Back to the future in Italy
  • The lessons from Fillon's first gaffe
  • Montebourg - a bit of everything
  • The Maastricht error
  • If Paul Romer is right...
  • August 22, 2016
  • Gold for Brexit
  • EU and Turkey talking past each other
  • Switzerland is the next migrant transit country
  • On the death of neoliberal economics
  • April 25, 2016
  • The death of the Grand Coalition
  • Insurrection against TTIP
  • Juppé to benefit from Macron hype
  • On optimal currency areas
  • Why the Artic region could be the next geopolitical troublespot
  • From a currency to a people
  • May 22, 2020
  • Russia and Turkey double down in Libya
  • What to make of No 10's Brexit briefings
  • May 04, 2020
  • What is and isn't true about the Wuhan lab conspiracies
  • Towards a new government in Ireland
  • April 15, 2020
  • Italy’s coalition disagrees about the ESM
  • March 31, 2020
  • Orbán's power grab
  • Why we would like to share the optimism on eurobonds, but can’t.
  • March 16, 2020
  • Why many of the Covid-19 statistics are misleading
  • March 02, 2020
  • What the return of the refugee crisis tells us about the EU
  • Does the UK really want a deal? Does France?
  • February 17, 2020
  • Security issues we should be discussing
  • Salvini has changed his mind on the euro - yet again
  • February 04, 2020
  • A glimmer of hope on EU/UK trade
  • January 24, 2020
  • Is Germany anti-semitic and racist?
  • Did the Greek financial crisis play a role in Brexit?
  • January 15, 2020
  • Philippe's not-so-generous compromise offer
  • What is Erdogan up to in Libya?
  • When it is noise and not a signal
  • January 06, 2020
  • A decade that started with a bang
  • What to expect of Spain's next government
  • Divide et impera: Macron's pension reform strategy
  • December 16, 2019
  • What the failure in Madrid says about multilateral governance
  • December 09, 2019
  • The next three days
  • December 03, 2019
  • What to look out for in the last week of the compaign
  • Trump threatens tariffs on French luxury exports
  • November 28, 2019
  • Merkel’s legacy
  • November 25, 2019
  • Twenty years on - and less safe than ever
  • Philippe's last round of talks ahead of strike actions
  • November 21, 2019
  • Brussels warns Paris and Rome about not using low interest rates
  • What’s behind Thomas Mayer’s crypto-currency
  • November 20, 2019
  • A dramatic loss of confidence in government and state in Germany
  • November 19, 2019
  • Not the time to bet against the Franco-German relationship
  • German employers and union united against the debt brake