We use cookies to help improve and maintain our site. More information.
close

November 21, 2019

Brussels warns Paris and Rome about not using low interest rates

The European Commission published its opinion on the draft budgets of all member states, dividing countries into two categories depending on  whether they complied or failed to comply with the fiscal targets. Some of those that stayed within the rules could have increased spending, the Commission says. But, as ever, the emphasis was clearly on the eight member states at risk of non-compliance. Four among them - France, Italy Spain and Belgium - were singled out for not having taken enough advantage of the favourable interest-rate conditions to reduce their debt. The latter two still have no new government in place.

France is used to getting a letter from Brussels to warn about a deviation from fiscal targets. Paris usually shoots back with a primacy-of-politics argument. Remember that Emmanuel Macron started off by wanting to deliver on the fiscal targets as a way to build trust with Germany, so that Germany would support him in his eurozone agenda? Those days are long gone. His ambitions for the eurozone have been clipped. Relations with Germany have cooled and the gilets jaunes and the grand débat forced him to prioritise old-fashioned politics. Pierre Moscovici started out as commissioner in 2014 with a warning letter to his home country, and is finishing with yet another letter to Paris. In 2014 it was the high fiscal deficit and lack of structural efforts. This time it is the high level of public debt and France's failure to reduce the deficit during good times. French public debt is currently just below 99% of GDP. The Commission is expecting it to worsen slightly next year. The French government had initially promised to cut debt levels by 5pp during Macron's presidency. Now it looks like it is going to be less than 1pp. 

Italy is the other large country that received a warning about its debt-to-GDP ration, of 136%. Brussels is worried that its high debt levels make Italy vulnerable to changes in debt issuance costs. Once the era of low or negative interest rates is over, Italy could face trouble. But the current era could last a while and, for so long as it does, it will be difficult to get a political consensus to pay down debt when the economy is performing poorly. Compared to last year, Brussels is much more relaxed about Italy. After Salvini's threats the current Five Star coalition with the Social Democrats is seen as moderate and reliable. The verdict is thus also a relief. No additional measures are asked of Rome this year. The measures Italy had to take last year will only be assessed in 2021.

Show Comments Write a Comment

November 21, 2019

What’s behind Thomas Mayer’s crypto-currency

We once joked that the reason the economics profession has a problem with crypto-currencies was the lack of employment opportunities for economists. The serious argument is that a digital currency would act like a gold standard on steriods. 

The debate has since moved on. Conservative economists have discovered digital currencies as the ideal tool to destroy the fiat money system. 

Thomas Mayer makes the case for turning the euro into what he calls a stablecoin - a digital currency backed by the ECB’s existing assets. 

We make no secret of our deep scepticism of what we consider a modern version of the gold standard. But we note with interest that behind this proposal lies a political deal that might be used in a different context as well. This is acceptance of the full monetisation of the ECB’s existing sovereign bond holdings in exchange for a different kind of monetary policy in the future. It is probably best to distil that particular idea from Mayer’s concrete proposal.

The critical element of Mayer's proposal is that the increase in the money supply would be algorithmic, hard-coded into the system. For example, the system may expand the money supply on the basis of an economic indicator like economic output or, as Mayer suggests, potential output. The critical point is that there would be no political influence. 

Since all of this would require treaty change, we see no chance whatsoever that politicians would agree to a policy that effectively hands over the key to an algorithm. 

But let us indulge in this scenario a little while further. If that system had been in place in 2010-2012, some eurozone member states would have defaulted on their debt. The result would have been an unimaginable banking crisis which the central bank would not have been in a position to feather. It is our sense that the eventual failure of the eurozone may be the intent behind of such a hard-money system. If your aim is to maintain the eurozone with its existing perimeter, such a system is unlikely to deliver it.

But this observation of ours will not end the debate. Crypto-currencies have given the monetary conservatives a tool they lacked before. A return to the gold standard was never realistic, but a crypto-currency has some intrinsic attractions. Some of them are even approved of by mainstream economists. Ken Rogoff, for example, favours crypto-currencies as a tool against money laundering. 

Mayer is a former chief economist of Deutsche Bank and still a major figure in the German economic and financial scene. We are not sure whether he speaks for a majority, but we should not underestimate the degree of support he has - at least domestically.

We reported yesterday on a survey showing a dramatic loss of public confidence in the German government, but also in the institutions of the state. A fiat money system is a social contract, backed by trust. The ongoing debate about Mayer-style crypto-currencies reflect the loss of trust in the system. We have taken issue time and again with the German narratives of money and especially of negative interest rates. But we have to acknowledge that this loss of trust exists, and that this kind of proposal feeds on that discontent.

Show Comments Write a Comment

This is the public section of the Eurointelligence Professional Briefing, which focuses on the geopolitical aspects of our news coverage. It appears daily at 2pm CET. The full briefing, which appears at 9am CET, is only available to subscribers. Please click here for a free trial, and here for the Eurointelligence home page.

 

Recent News

  • March 16, 2020
  • Why many of the Covid-19 statistics are misleading
  • September 17, 2019
  • Beware of the diplomacy of humiliation
  • Germany’s climate hypocrisy
  • March 18, 2019
  • May's deal still on the table. Don't rule it out.
  • EPP decision on Fidesz still open
  • On the defeat of liberalism
  • September 21, 2018
  • SPD ministers want to continue grand coalition
  • March 28, 2018
  • The real reason for the sanctions against Russia
  • Wishful thinking: Brexit edition
  • Wishful thinking: Future of euro edition
  • Wishful thinking: Italy edition
  • October 02, 2017
  • Catalonia recalls EU and eurozone instability
  • French trade unions increase pressure over labour reforms
  • Watch out for a political accident in the UK
  • Municipal elections boost Portugal's Socialists
  • April 10, 2017
  • Nein, nein, nein, und nein
  • Sounds like a bad Brexit story, but ain’t
  • On how not to exit the euro
  • October 17, 2016
  • Ceta is dead for now
  • L’après-Hollande, c'est Hollande
  • SPD against Russia sanctions
  • Nissan to join customs union and other fanciful tales
  • April 25, 2016
  • The death of the Grand Coalition
  • Insurrection against TTIP
  • Juppé to benefit from Macron hype
  • On optimal currency areas
  • Why the Artic region could be the next geopolitical troublespot
  • From a currency to a people
  • May 29, 2020
  • Why it is not €500bn
  • Is reshoring the answer to this pandemic?
  • January 22, 2020
  • Erdogan and European Libya diplomacy
  • On the importance of mutual recognition agreements in the Brexit trade talks
  • September 17, 2019
  • Beware of the diplomacy of humiliation
  • Germany’s climate hypocrisy
  • May 10, 2019
  • Target2 debate raises legitimate questions with unsatisfactory answers
  • No more German questions please
  • January 04, 2019
  • Will the AfD become the Dexit party?
  • Romania's corruption problem in the spotlight of its EU presidency
  • August 28, 2018
  • Urban politics and national crisis - the Irish case
  • How anti-semitism became one of the main issues in British politics
  • April 23, 2018
  • More bad news for the SPD
  • Will Theresa May accept a customs union? The Times says yes. We think so too.
  • A comeback for Marine Le Pen?
  • December 21, 2017
  • Catalonia votes
  • A deputy prime minister resigns
  • Will Gibraltar result in another Irish fudge?
  • Blood, sweat and tears
  • August 21, 2017
  • Soft, getting softer
  • Tsipras' chances of a boost
  • On the fallacy of a middle-ground option for the eurozone
  • April 19, 2017
  • Shadows of money
  • Breppe Grillo vs Eurointelligence
  • December 19, 2016
  • Inside the customs union, outside the single market
  • Back to the future in Italy
  • The lessons from Fillon's first gaffe
  • Montebourg - a bit of everything
  • The Maastricht error
  • If Paul Romer is right...
  • August 22, 2016
  • Gold for Brexit
  • EU and Turkey talking past each other
  • Switzerland is the next migrant transit country
  • On the death of neoliberal economics
  • April 25, 2016
  • The death of the Grand Coalition
  • Insurrection against TTIP
  • Juppé to benefit from Macron hype
  • On optimal currency areas
  • Why the Artic region could be the next geopolitical troublespot
  • From a currency to a people
  • May 22, 2020
  • Russia and Turkey double down in Libya
  • What to make of No 10's Brexit briefings
  • May 04, 2020
  • What is and isn't true about the Wuhan lab conspiracies
  • Towards a new government in Ireland
  • April 15, 2020
  • Italy’s coalition disagrees about the ESM
  • March 31, 2020
  • Orbán's power grab
  • Why we would like to share the optimism on eurobonds, but can’t.
  • March 16, 2020
  • Why many of the Covid-19 statistics are misleading
  • March 02, 2020
  • What the return of the refugee crisis tells us about the EU
  • Does the UK really want a deal? Does France?
  • February 17, 2020
  • Security issues we should be discussing
  • Salvini has changed his mind on the euro - yet again
  • February 04, 2020
  • A glimmer of hope on EU/UK trade
  • January 24, 2020
  • Is Germany anti-semitic and racist?
  • Did the Greek financial crisis play a role in Brexit?
  • January 15, 2020
  • Philippe's not-so-generous compromise offer
  • What is Erdogan up to in Libya?
  • When it is noise and not a signal
  • January 06, 2020
  • A decade that started with a bang
  • What to expect of Spain's next government
  • Divide et impera: Macron's pension reform strategy
  • December 19, 2019
  • Merkel rejects NordStream2 counter-sanctions
  • December 12, 2019
  • Greta is right - the EU’s fight against climate change is most likely a PR exercise
  • December 06, 2019
  • First strike day with high turnout - what next?
  • The arguments in favour of an Italian veto
  • December 02, 2019
  • Will pension reform protests spiral out of control?
  • Malta's PM resigns over murder case
  • November 28, 2019
  • Merkel’s legacy
  • November 25, 2019
  • Twenty years on - and less safe than ever
  • Philippe's last round of talks ahead of strike actions
  • November 22, 2019
  • Some thoughts about Labour’s manifesto
  • November 21, 2019
  • Brussels warns Paris and Rome about not using low interest rates
  • What’s behind Thomas Mayer’s crypto-currency