We use cookies to help improve and maintain our site. More information.

November 29, 2019

Macron is doubling down on his Nato stance

Next week’s Nato summit in London promises to become a moment of truth not only for Nato itself, but especially for its European members. In particular, it will be a first test of Emmanuel Macron’s new strong-arm diplomacy. 

Macron reiterated yesterday that he is ready to engage with Vladimir Putin over his proposal for a moratorium of land-based medium-range nuclear missiles. He is the only Nato leader who is. He said so standing next to Jens Stoltenberg, the Nato secretary general, who was in Paris yesterday. Macron has written a letter to Putin - not co-ordinated with other Nato members - in which he offered to engage in talks. He did send a copy of the letter to other Nato leaders, but only after the fact. The German foreign minister, Heiko Maas, said he fears the proposal would add to Europe’s divisions and would lead to a decoupling of European and US security interests.

FAZ writes that the Europeans are sceptical of Putin’s offer because Nato believes that Russia has 64 undeclared cruise missile of the SSC-8 type, which could be armed with nuclear weapons. If Nato were to agree to a moratorium, the effect would be to give Russia an unfair advantage while stopping Nato countries from countering the threat.

For us, the bigger issue is whether Macron’s new diplomatic style can succeed. Probably not directly, but we think this is part of a broader diplomatic effort to shift the balance of views within the EU. What is not understood in Germany is that his diplomacy is also in part a consequence of Germany’s effective rebuttal of his EU reform plans. He does not owe anything to Angela Merkel. He is now extending the scope of his disruption from France to both of the EU and Nato at the same time. His big problem is a lack of allies, but on foreign policy and security his position is powerful. He has a veto on EU enlargement, and after Brexit France will be the only remaining nuclear power in the EU. Normally it is not a wise course of action in the EU to pursue goals in isolation. This might be different - if it is part of broader strategy.

Show Comments Write a Comment

November 29, 2019

France accuses Europeans of free riding in the Sahel

The French lost 13 soldiers in a combat mission against the Islamic State in the Sahel region, the biggest loss of life of French troops since 1983. France has complained to European allies that it is bearing the brunt of a counter-terrorism operation that benefits all of Europe. They are seeking European engagement in the area beyond logistical support, arguing that this region could well turn into a safe heaven for terrorists and thus a problem for everyone. Emanuel Macron no longer minces his words, as when he said yesterday: 

"If people want to understand what they call 'cost-sharing', they can come on Monday to the ceremonies France is organising for the dead soldiers. There they will see the price."

This is clearly directed at Germany and adds an emotional component to the divisions between the two countries over Nato. 

As the former colonial power, France is the only Western country with a significant military presence in Mali and the wider Sahel region south of the Sahara desert. But despite French troops, 15,000 UN peacekeepers in Mali, and thousands of pan-regional forces, Islamist militants have strengthened their foothold across the arid region. Since France launched its military action in 2013, thirty-eight French soldiers have been killed. The peace accord agreed in Mali in 2015 is yet to be implemented. On November 20 France urged its European counterparts to step up their presence in west Africa, already pointing out that if jihadist groups are able to operate from this region they threaten Europe as a whole.

Show Comments Write a Comment

November 29, 2019

Beware of the empty chair

When one of us went to journalism school back in the 1980s, we were taugh a cast-iron rule of broadcasting: if someone does not accept your invitation to an interview, do not place an empty chair in the studio. Channel 4 last night replaced an absent Boris Johnson, not with a chair but a melting ice sculpture. The Tories are now threatening to withdraw the station's licence if re-elected.

The nature of journalism has changed since the 1980s, but the empty chair rule remains a good one. This is not because it protects politicians, but because it protects journalists. For starters, if the purpose of the stunt is to damage the Tories it will not do the job. The voters who are sitting on the fence are those torn with doubt - about Brexit, about the consequences of a second referendum, or about Jeremy Corbyn. The ice sculpture will reinforce the view of those who already made up their mind. But it will not melt doubt. It does damage the reputation of journalism and, if Channel 4 loses its licence, it will cost a lot of journalist jobs. 

Show Comments Write a Comment

This is the public section of the Eurointelligence Professional Briefing, which focuses on the geopolitical aspects of our news coverage. It appears daily at 2pm CET. The full briefing, which appears at 9am CET, is only available to subscribers. Please click here for a free trial, and here for the Eurointelligence home page.


Recent News

  • July 03, 2017
  • Can Greece exit its programme without a credit line?
  • The softening Brexit
  • Macron's state of the nation address
  • November 28, 2016
  • And now what Monsieur Fillion?
  • The inescapable logic of an interim agreement
  • On Germany's foreign policy post-Trump
  • How to lose against the populists
  • April 25, 2016
  • The death of the Grand Coalition
  • Insurrection against TTIP
  • Juppé to benefit from Macron hype
  • On optimal currency areas
  • Why the Artic region could be the next geopolitical troublespot
  • From a currency to a people
  • March 16, 2020
  • Why many of the Covid-19 statistics are misleading
  • September 17, 2019
  • Beware of the diplomacy of humiliation
  • Germany’s climate hypocrisy
  • March 18, 2019
  • May's deal still on the table. Don't rule it out.
  • EPP decision on Fidesz still open
  • On the defeat of liberalism
  • September 21, 2018
  • SPD ministers want to continue grand coalition
  • March 28, 2018
  • The real reason for the sanctions against Russia
  • Wishful thinking: Brexit edition
  • Wishful thinking: Future of euro edition
  • Wishful thinking: Italy edition
  • October 02, 2017
  • Catalonia recalls EU and eurozone instability
  • French trade unions increase pressure over labour reforms
  • Watch out for a political accident in the UK
  • Municipal elections boost Portugal's Socialists
  • April 10, 2017
  • Nein, nein, nein, und nein
  • Sounds like a bad Brexit story, but ain’t
  • On how not to exit the euro
  • October 17, 2016
  • Ceta is dead for now
  • L’après-Hollande, c'est Hollande
  • SPD against Russia sanctions
  • Nissan to join customs union and other fanciful tales
  • April 25, 2016
  • The death of the Grand Coalition
  • Insurrection against TTIP
  • Juppé to benefit from Macron hype
  • On optimal currency areas
  • Why the Artic region could be the next geopolitical troublespot
  • From a currency to a people
  • May 29, 2020
  • Why it is not €500bn
  • Is reshoring the answer to this pandemic?
  • January 22, 2020
  • Erdogan and European Libya diplomacy
  • On the importance of mutual recognition agreements in the Brexit trade talks
  • September 17, 2019
  • Beware of the diplomacy of humiliation
  • Germany’s climate hypocrisy
  • May 10, 2019
  • Target2 debate raises legitimate questions with unsatisfactory answers
  • No more German questions please
  • January 04, 2019
  • Will the AfD become the Dexit party?
  • Romania's corruption problem in the spotlight of its EU presidency
  • August 28, 2018
  • Urban politics and national crisis - the Irish case
  • How anti-semitism became one of the main issues in British politics
  • April 23, 2018
  • More bad news for the SPD
  • Will Theresa May accept a customs union? The Times says yes. We think so too.
  • A comeback for Marine Le Pen?
  • December 21, 2017
  • Catalonia votes
  • A deputy prime minister resigns
  • Will Gibraltar result in another Irish fudge?
  • Blood, sweat and tears
  • August 21, 2017
  • Soft, getting softer
  • Tsipras' chances of a boost
  • On the fallacy of a middle-ground option for the eurozone
  • April 19, 2017
  • Shadows of money
  • Breppe Grillo vs Eurointelligence
  • December 19, 2016
  • Inside the customs union, outside the single market
  • Back to the future in Italy
  • The lessons from Fillon's first gaffe
  • Montebourg - a bit of everything
  • The Maastricht error
  • If Paul Romer is right...
  • August 22, 2016
  • Gold for Brexit
  • EU and Turkey talking past each other
  • Switzerland is the next migrant transit country
  • On the death of neoliberal economics
  • April 25, 2016
  • The death of the Grand Coalition
  • Insurrection against TTIP
  • Juppé to benefit from Macron hype
  • On optimal currency areas
  • Why the Artic region could be the next geopolitical troublespot
  • From a currency to a people
  • June 17, 2020
  • Dijon violence and the politics of law and order
  • A Franco-German divide on holding Turkey accountable over Libya
  • May 29, 2020
  • Why it is not €500bn
  • Is reshoring the answer to this pandemic?
  • May 10, 2020
  • On court rulings and folk economics
  • EU regions - some far better on Covid-19 but not on downturn
  • April 22, 2020
  • Can we afford a second lockdown?
  • EU to help hardest-hit tourism sector
  • April 07, 2020
  • Austria and Denmark - first to exit after Easter
  • All change in the UK
  • Eastern Europe’s unnoticed economic shock
  • March 23, 2020
  • Orbán seeks to extend his powers
  • UK as the double counterfactual
  • March 09, 2020
  • Lockdown measures are not working
  • Will the ceasefire hold in Idlib?
  • February 24, 2020
  • Coronavirus comes to Europe
  • Municipal elections - a precursor for Le Pen?
  • Germany and France get involved over Idlib
  • February 13, 2020
  • Macron's small steps environment policies
  • On the loss of judicial or central banking independence
  • February 02, 2020
  • Is Sinn Fein the Irish anti-establishment vote?
  • Don’t assume that nobody will follow the Brits
  • January 24, 2020
  • Is Germany anti-semitic and racist?
  • Did the Greek financial crisis play a role in Brexit?
  • January 15, 2020
  • Philippe's not-so-generous compromise offer
  • What is Erdogan up to in Libya?
  • When it is noise and not a signal
  • January 06, 2020
  • A decade that started with a bang
  • What to expect of Spain's next government
  • Divide et impera: Macron's pension reform strategy
  • December 23, 2019
  • What’s behind the NordStream2 sanctions
  • An important ruling by the Dutch constitutional court
  • This time Popolare di Bari brings EU bank resolution into question
  • The reversal of the eurozone external balances
  • No Christmas truce in France
  • Brace for Erdogan's foreign policy ambitions
  • On the decline of the centrist left
  • December 16, 2019
  • What the failure in Madrid says about multilateral governance
  • December 10, 2019
  • Squeezed between US and Russia - Open Skies edition
  • December 06, 2019
  • First strike day with high turnout - what next?
  • The arguments in favour of an Italian veto
  • December 03, 2019
  • What to look out for in the last week of the compaign
  • Trump threatens tariffs on French luxury exports
  • December 02, 2019
  • Will pension reform protests spiral out of control?
  • Malta's PM resigns over murder case