We use cookies to help improve and maintain our site. More information.

January 07, 2020

Europe's fast disappearance from the UK debate

It was understandable for the UK political scene to go on an extended holiday after last year’s political marathon. What we find interesting is the sheer extent to which Europe has turned from a singular obsession into a non-issue overnight. Some of the most prominent Remain campaigners in the Labour Party now say that the battle is lost, and that it is time to move on. Sir Keir Starmer, the shadow Brexit secretary and one of the leading candidates for the Labour leadership, did not mention Europe once in his slick campaign video. Instead he focused mostly on his record as a human-rights lawyer and on inequality. Among the candidates only Jess Phillips, a backbench MP from Birmingham, said she would campaign to take the UK back into the EU. But this was in response to a question. And she clearly hadn't though this through. The disappearance of the EU as a political theme is consistent with our previous observation that much of the Remain/Leave debate was a proxy battle for other political conflicts: between the interests of urban and rural Britain, the north vs the south, new elites versus old.

The debate about the UK’s relationship with the EU will, of course, return as a substantive issue. Brexit will happen by the end of the month, but the future relationship has yet to be mapped out. Tomorrow, Boris Johnson will meet with Ursula von der Leyen to discuss the scope and timetable for negotiations. Trade is only one of several points, and possibly not even the most important one given the most recent political events in the Middle East. The future relationship will clearly be among our foreseeable themes this year.

The expectations among journalists in the UK is that Johnson will invariably extend the transition period deadline of end-December. With a comfortable Commons majority, Johnson can do what he likes. Several events over the last few weeks have made us more cautious about a delay, though. 

The fixed-term parliament act will go, which means that the length of parliamentary terms will revert into a range of four to five years. On the basis of a four-year term, we would assume that Johnson would want to leave the transitional period well before the next election. But even a short extension would not buy enough time for a deep trade agreement, the kind that includes investment and requires ratification by member states and some regional assemblies. A minimal EU-level deal, by contrast, focusing on trade tariffs and rules of origin, can be done quickly. 

This leads us to think that Johnson may be favouring a narrow deal first, with additional bits added later and maybe some additional transitional arrangements for areas in which discussions will continue. So this may be not be such a black-and-white issue as it sometimes appears. Also consider that the EU cannot credibly take the negotiations to the brink, given its own commercial interests and the lack of a pro-Remain majority in the UK parliament this time around. The discussions will be much more symmetric in the sense that both sides would gain from an agreement, and would lose from a failure.

Show Comments Write a Comment

January 07, 2020

How to de-escalate with Erdogan?

Recep Tayyip Erdogan is getting himself involved into a bloody battle in Libya. He is also adamant hat Turkey has a right to exploit the natural gas resources in the eastern Mediterranean, and willing to risk a full confrontation with the the EU over this. Moreover, his strategy for Syria is not clear yet. With several fronts open and prone to escalation, will Erdogan become even more unpredictable? 

Greece is concentrating its efforts on de-escalation of the situation, amid arguably the worst tensions in Greek-Turkish relationships since 1974. Foreign ministers from Greece, France, Italy, Cyprus and Egypt meet in Cairo tomorrow to discuss the developments since Turkey signed a maritime border agreement with Libya.

Last week Turkey’s parliament approved a military deployment to Libya just as Greece, Cyrpus and Israel signed the EastMed pipeline construction agreement. Turkey is now moving its military forces to support the struggling government of Libyan prime minister Fayez al-Sarraj against his opponent general Haftar, who controls most of the country and has the backing of Egypt, Russia, UAE and Jordan. Erdogan backs the government as a quid pro quo for Libya signing the agreement on maritime borders which Turkey is using to stake its claim on the Eastern-Mediterranean continental shelf for gas drilling.

The FT reports that Haftar entered the strategic city of Sirte as the battle for control in this oil rich country continues. The fall of Sirte, in the centre of Libya’s coastline, would be a blow to the government and may draw Turkey further into the war.  The Europeans, Greece and Cyprus in particular, will need to steel their nerves. 

Show Comments Write a Comment

January 07, 2020

Working less for more

In 1930 John Maynard Keynes predicted that technological change and productivity improvements would eventually lead to a 15-hour workweek. We are not quite there yet, as most of Western cultures still work 40 hours on average. Fundamental changes will have to happen in the working world to allow such a shift. But there are already political initiatives out there to reduce working time significantly, and some evidence suggests that this could even improve productivity.

Finland’s new prime minister, the 34-year-old Sanna Marin, just called for a flexible working-time module to allow for a four-day day working week that increases productivity, and leads to healthier and happier employees and even a lower carbon footprint, so the Guardian

A six-hour-day working day was trialled in the city of Gothenburg in Sweden for nurses, who turned out to be happier, healthier and more energetic. Microsoft in Japan took a bold move and introduced a four-day week for their employees, and productivity went up by a staggering 40%. But introducing a four-day week is costly especially for services, a reason why it was abandoned in Gothenburg. Also it is operationally complex. This does not mean it is impossible. Manufacturing has seen many shifts in working hours over the last century. 

Will Marin's flexible work-time proposal fly in Finland? Finnish trade unions just resolved a months-long nasty dispute with employers resulting in a 3.3% pay rise. The battered employers might not have the appetite for such a costly innovation at the moment. And it is not clear yet how politically determined Marin will be to back up her proposal. Even if her four-hour week proposal does not fly, the trend may be inevitable. As artificial intelligence expands into many aspects of production, reducing work time will become a feature of our time. 

Show Comments Write a Comment

This is the public section of the Eurointelligence Professional Briefing, which focuses on the geopolitical aspects of our news coverage. It appears daily at 2pm CET. The full briefing, which appears at 9am CET, is only available to subscribers. Please click here for a free trial, and here for the Eurointelligence home page.


Recent News

  • March 03, 2020
  • On the unintended consequences of GDPR
  • September 05, 2019
  • Would Keynes be in favour of Brexit?
  • March 11, 2019
  • Ask what Europe can do for Germany - AKK's EU manifesto
  • September 14, 2018
  • Carney warns about dramatic hard Brexit impact on housing market
  • Can Africa thrive on free trade with Europe?
  • March 21, 2018
  • The political pathway to a Brexit revocation is closing
  • September 26, 2017
  • Brexit is a binary choice between EEA or third-country status
  • April 05, 2017
  • What if Macron were to become president?
  • The case for relative optimism about Article 50
  • October 14, 2016
  • Tusk's awkward choice
  • Seven candidates, three debates
  • April 25, 2016
  • The death of the Grand Coalition
  • Insurrection against TTIP
  • Juppé to benefit from Macron hype
  • On optimal currency areas
  • Why the Artic region could be the next geopolitical troublespot
  • From a currency to a people
  • May 22, 2020
  • Russia and Turkey double down in Libya
  • What to make of No 10's Brexit briefings
  • January 15, 2020
  • Philippe's not-so-generous compromise offer
  • What is Erdogan up to in Libya?
  • When it is noise and not a signal
  • September 11, 2019
  • What are the chances of a deal?
  • May 09, 2019
  • The EU's impossible dilemma
  • The horsetrading starts in Sibiu
  • May to bring withdrawal bill to Commons week after next
  • January 04, 2019
  • Will the AfD become the Dexit party?
  • Romania's corruption problem in the spotlight of its EU presidency
  • August 24, 2018
  • Towards a standoff between Italy and the EU
  • A short note on the diminishing role of economists in political life
  • April 23, 2018
  • More bad news for the SPD
  • Will Theresa May accept a customs union? The Times says yes. We think so too.
  • A comeback for Marine Le Pen?
  • December 20, 2017
  • Down with the gown
  • How to overcome the political gridlock in Italy
  • Varoufakis is suing the ECB
  • August 21, 2017
  • Soft, getting softer
  • Tsipras' chances of a boost
  • On the fallacy of a middle-ground option for the eurozone
  • April 12, 2017
  • Macro in a state of denial
  • Where Schulz is vulnerable
  • Schäuble’s three party tricks
  • December 15, 2016
  • Scared of its own electorate
  • Towards a transitional deal
  • The comeback of Gerhard Schröder as the SPD's powerbroker
  • August 19, 2016
  • Brexit realities slowly dawning on the City
  • Opening shot for Hollande's campaign
  • April 25, 2016
  • The death of the Grand Coalition
  • Insurrection against TTIP
  • Juppé to benefit from Macron hype
  • On optimal currency areas
  • Why the Artic region could be the next geopolitical troublespot
  • From a currency to a people
  • July 14, 2020
  • Why the far-right might win in the end
  • June 25, 2020
  • Spain may reject German asylum-reform plan
  • What Scottish whiskey and Leica camera lenses have in common
  • June 08, 2020
  • Brexit talks at an impasse
  • Trump's troop reduction in Germany - another way to divide the EU?
  • May 20, 2020
  • Car purchase premiums - a way to save the car industry?
  • Centralised lockdown, decentralised exit
  • May 04, 2020
  • What is and isn't true about the Wuhan lab conspiracies
  • Towards a new government in Ireland
  • April 20, 2020
  • What if we are wrong?
  • April 06, 2020
  • The feedback loop of Covid-19 and inequalities - part 10 of our series
  • How confinement affects mental health
  • March 23, 2020
  • Orbán seeks to extend his powers
  • UK as the double counterfactual
  • March 10, 2020
  • Virus math
  • February 28, 2020
  • The EU's sheer complacency is unbelievable
  • A game of blind man’s bluff, to be played for three months
  • February 19, 2020
  • Degrowth isn't enough to stem climate change
  • Is Renzi finished?
  • Welcome to Germany, Tesla
  • February 10, 2020
  • A new era in Irish politics with Sinn Féin
  • More fish, please
  • February 02, 2020
  • Is Sinn Fein the Irish anti-establishment vote?
  • Don’t assume that nobody will follow the Brits
  • January 27, 2020
  • How the left lays the ground for Le Pen
  • Project Fear - Irish Edition
  • January 21, 2020
  • A truce over French digital tax and US tariff retaliation - really?
  • Climate crisis faces central banks with radical uncertainty
  • Why strong enforcement rules will be critical in the EU/UK trade agreement
  • January 16, 2020
  • How the US blackmails the EU
  • What to make of the resignation of the Russian government
  • January 13, 2020
  • Libya - the new playground for diplomatic posturing
  • NI has a government at last
  • January 09, 2020
  • Libya - the next Syria?
  • Labour’s energy-sapping leadership election
  • January 08, 2020
  • What to expect from Boris and Ursula
  • Some good news from Germany on climate change