We use cookies to help improve and maintain our site. More information.
close

January 08, 2020

What to expect from Boris and Ursula

One of the things we keep noting is that political commentators in particular have a tendency to double down - confounding their own sentiment on Brexit with their analysis and predictions. We noted a couple of comments in the Guardian and the Wall Street Journal written in the same spirit as those articles in 2019 predicting that the EU would under no circumstances reopen the withdrawal agreement. Fanboys often get disappointed when their own team changes course.

We do not want to minimise the complexities of a future trade relationship between the UK and the EU. Boris Johnson and Ursula von der Leyen are due to meet today to discuss the framework of the agreement. The end-of-year deadline is tight, but not impossible in our view. The most important change that has taken place in the last few years is the change in EU’s trade policy regime that result from the European Court of Justice's 2017 ruling. This follows a request by the European Commission to the ECJ to clarify the competences between the EU and member states in connection with the EU-Singapore trade deal. The court ruled that only provisions relating to non-direct foreign investment and dispute settlements were of a shared competence nature. In other words, only those categories require the whole charade of ratification procedures by national parliaments. All the other stuff can be negotiated at EU level. This ruling makes it possible for the EU and the UK to strike a multi-tiered trade deal, starting with a core trade deal that can be agreed at EU level, followed by subsequent agreements.

We conclude from this that it is perfectly possible for the UK to leave the transitional period either at the scheduled date of end-2020, or shortly thereafter if an extension were agreed before July.

What about the negotiations themselves? We noted that Michel Barnier insisted that any type of trade deal - even a minimal tariff-only deal - would require regulatory alignment and EU access to UK fishing waters. We consider that to be an unreasonable position because it is simply not a sustainable negotiating position as we approach the cliff-edge. There are massive EU interests at stake as well. From a UK perspective, the relative benefits of a tariff-only deal would be comparatively small when set against the need for full regulatory alignment, subjugation to EU jurisdiction, and EU access to fishing waters. 

We can, however, see compromises in all of these areas. What the UK could agree, for example, is a contractual undertaking to comply with international standards on the environment and on labour market regulation to address French concerns of environmental dumping. We think the latter is a non-issue if only because France is more likely to have issues with Germany than with the UK.

We think that it should be perfectly possible for the EU and the UK to strike a trade deal facilitating the free flow of goods by the end of this year - to be followed by other agreements later. We cannot rule out a WTO-Brexit, but note that the EU does not have to proceed with unanimity on this issue. The UK parliament will also this time not pass legislation to force the government to seek an extension, thus indirectly colluding with the EU as happened previously. The political environment has changed as a result of both the 2017 ECJ ruling and the 2019 UK elections. We expect that the interests of industry are going to play a more prominent role in this round of the negotiations, in contrast to the discussions on the withdrawal agreement itself.

Show Comments Write a Comment

January 08, 2020

Some good news from Germany on climate change

Germany achieved a surprisingly large CO2 reduction in 2019, due to a spike in the CO2 market price. The source for this information, via ZDF TV, is an analysis by the environmental think tank Agora, which has done the carbon math before the German government publishes its own statistics. According to the analysis, Germany cut its emissions by about 50m tonnes last year. This means that Germany has achieved a 35% reduction of CO2 relative to the base year of 1990. The end-2020 target - still out of reach - is for a 40% cut. 

Agora warns that, based on current trends, the gap is likely to rise again in 2021. What is being observed is not a change in policy but a one-off shift due to a higher price. 

What the data do tell us is that emissions are highly sensitive to price. The current version of the German climate package, agreed between the grand coalition and the Greens, foresees an initial across-the-board carbon price of €25 from next year onwards. The climate policy still contains a price cap of €60 which is designed to protect German industry. Based on the estimates we have seen, there is no way Germany can meet its Paris climate goals on the basis of these numbers.

The ZDF report noted that most of the cuts were in industry. CO2 emissions from cars actually increased last year, as a result of the German trend toward the use of SUVs. 

Show Comments Write a Comment

This is the public section of the Eurointelligence Professional Briefing, which focuses on the geopolitical aspects of our news coverage. It appears daily at 2pm CET. The full briefing, which appears at 9am CET, is only available to subscribers. Please click here for a free trial, and here for the Eurointelligence home page.

 

Recent News

  • May 29, 2020
  • Why it is not €500bn
  • Is reshoring the answer to this pandemic?
  • January 22, 2020
  • Erdogan and European Libya diplomacy
  • On the importance of mutual recognition agreements in the Brexit trade talks
  • September 17, 2019
  • Beware of the diplomacy of humiliation
  • Germany’s climate hypocrisy
  • May 10, 2019
  • Target2 debate raises legitimate questions with unsatisfactory answers
  • No more German questions please
  • January 04, 2019
  • Will the AfD become the Dexit party?
  • Romania's corruption problem in the spotlight of its EU presidency
  • August 28, 2018
  • Urban politics and national crisis - the Irish case
  • How anti-semitism became one of the main issues in British politics
  • April 23, 2018
  • More bad news for the SPD
  • Will Theresa May accept a customs union? The Times says yes. We think so too.
  • A comeback for Marine Le Pen?
  • December 21, 2017
  • Catalonia votes
  • A deputy prime minister resigns
  • Will Gibraltar result in another Irish fudge?
  • Blood, sweat and tears
  • August 21, 2017
  • Soft, getting softer
  • Tsipras' chances of a boost
  • On the fallacy of a middle-ground option for the eurozone
  • April 19, 2017
  • Shadows of money
  • Breppe Grillo vs Eurointelligence
  • December 19, 2016
  • Inside the customs union, outside the single market
  • Back to the future in Italy
  • The lessons from Fillon's first gaffe
  • Montebourg - a bit of everything
  • The Maastricht error
  • If Paul Romer is right...
  • August 22, 2016
  • Gold for Brexit
  • EU and Turkey talking past each other
  • Switzerland is the next migrant transit country
  • On the death of neoliberal economics
  • April 25, 2016
  • The death of the Grand Coalition
  • Insurrection against TTIP
  • Juppé to benefit from Macron hype
  • On optimal currency areas
  • Why the Artic region could be the next geopolitical troublespot
  • From a currency to a people
  • May 20, 2020
  • Car purchase premiums - a way to save the car industry?
  • Centralised lockdown, decentralised exit
  • May 04, 2020
  • What is and isn't true about the Wuhan lab conspiracies
  • Towards a new government in Ireland
  • April 20, 2020
  • What if we are wrong?
  • April 06, 2020
  • The feedback loop of Covid-19 and inequalities - part 10 of our series
  • How confinement affects mental health
  • March 23, 2020
  • Orbán seeks to extend his powers
  • UK as the double counterfactual
  • March 12, 2020
  • Irish Greens say no to coalition
  • The cause of Germany’s low Covid-19 mortality is potentially disturbing
  • March 02, 2020
  • What the return of the refugee crisis tells us about the EU
  • Does the UK really want a deal? Does France?
  • February 20, 2020
  • Germany's basic pension reform and its challenges
  • New UK immigration rules are at the tough end
  • February 12, 2020
  • Turkey's standoff with Russia over Idlib
  • Watch out for Renzi
  • February 05, 2020
  • Russia and Turkey on collision course
  • Politics of rupture - Ireland edition
  • What drives Italian parties to support or reject early elections
  • January 29, 2020
  • French democracy and how to voice dissent
  • Whatever happened to the SPD’s revolution?
  • January 24, 2020
  • Is Germany anti-semitic and racist?
  • Did the Greek financial crisis play a role in Brexit?
  • January 20, 2020
  • The EU in a diplomatic bear hug
  • French pension strikes come to a halt as violence grows
  • Scholz to stick to fiscal surplus in 2021
  • January 16, 2020
  • How the US blackmails the EU
  • What to make of the resignation of the Russian government
  • January 13, 2020
  • Libya - the new playground for diplomatic posturing
  • NI has a government at last
  • January 09, 2020
  • Libya - the next Syria?
  • Labour’s energy-sapping leadership election
  • January 08, 2020
  • What to expect from Boris and Ursula
  • Some good news from Germany on climate change