We use cookies to help improve and maintain our site. More information.

January 30, 2020

Trade union politics on balancing France's pension fund

French trade unions and employers are still divided over the pension system as they start their negotiations today over how the new system is to be financially balanced. If no common plan is agreed by April, the government will take back the reins. 

Édouard Philippe agreed to let trade unions and employers come up with their own cocktail of measures to finance the €12bn deficit the fund faces in 2027, and to ensure a balanced pension fund subsequently. The government granted this last round of negotiations in exchange for scrapping plans to raise the full pension retirement age to 64 for the current generation. But that will hold only if unions and employers find a financial alternative to balance the fund. But trade unions are far apart on this matter. The radical CGT and FO insist on a full withdrawal of the pension reform and do not accept any savings measures to balance the fund. The moderate CGDT was the one asking for this negotiation window to avoid the rise in retirement age. They are in favour of the unified point-based pension system, but want to leave their mark on the draft. They are presenting 40 measures to the National Assembly, which opens its debate on the pension reform draft next week. The employers excluded any rise in pension contributions, arguing that it would be detrimental for their competitiveness and their capacity to create jobs. If trade unions and employers cannot find a solution by April, the government will get back into the ring like it did when negotiations about the unemployment insurance failed to produce any satisfactory result. The stand-off over the pension reform is far from over yet.

Firefighters, meanwhile, succeeded to get enough concessions from the government to stop their protest movement, after violent clashes with the police earlier this week. The interior minister announced that their hazard premium will rise from 19% to 25% as of next year, and that they will have special treatment under the new unified pension system. They could be allowed to retire at 57 with an additional contribution. The unified pension system gets more and more exceptions as the challenges continue.

Show Comments Write a Comment

January 30, 2020

Johnson ready to let go of frictionless trade

We will have a special Brexit edition tomorrow to mark this seminal event of modern European history. This morning we noted the first reports in the UK media about Boris Johnson’s negotiating goals for the trade talks, which now won’t start until early March. The Telegraph reports that Johnson now accepts trade friction and border controls as a price for regulatory freedom.

We keep an open mind about eventual outcomes. We think the realm of possibilities ranges from a failure to agree a trade deal to a deal that keeps several sectors closely aligned to the EU's single market. Michel Barnier has told ambassadors that he is seeking to subject the UK to EU state-aid rules. We would characterise this idea as a deal breaker. If the EU insists on regulatory compliance as the price for zero tariffs, we think the UK would be rational to leave the EU without a trade agreement. 

We don’t therefore believe that the EU’s negotiation position can simultaneously be maintained and succeed. Something will have to give. In view of our Germany/Huawei story above, we would urge readers not to underestimate the mercantilistic instincts of the EU’s trade-surplus addicts when confronted with a tariff border along the English channel.

The sources of the Telegraph story also specifically refer to the EU’s demand for regulatory alignment in case of a tariff-only deal. They says, effectively, that Johnson would be ready to walk away. We find it interesting how he phrases his position with an emollient language. Johnson’s position, however, is not worked out in detail. The news reports merely refer to a decision of principle that, to him, sovereignty matters more than frictionless trade. 

In the UK, the debate has long moved away from open borders. We agree with the comment made by a former Downing Street chief of staff who said that the political landscape in the UK has completely changed with the recent elections. We don’t get a sense that this shift is widely understood in Brussels. 

There is room for compromise. But there is no question of the ECJ ruling on UK labour-market or environmental standards. Instead, the two sides could still include a chapter that commits them to respect international labour and environmental standards, fortified by arbitration panels and a system of fines against those who breach what is agreed. The deal could include early termination clauses.

Given the negotiation time frame, we believe the best hope would be a multi-level process. This would start with a tariff-only deal by the end of this year, and special transitional regimes for sectors in which both sides have an interest in maintaining close relations. One such sector is airlines. British Airways and Iberia have a co-operation that both sides may want to maintain in a post-Brexit regime.

Show Comments Write a Comment

This is the public section of the Eurointelligence Professional Briefing, which focuses on the geopolitical aspects of our news coverage. It appears daily at 2pm CET. The full briefing, which appears at 9am CET, is only available to subscribers. Please click here for a free trial, and here for the Eurointelligence home page.


Recent News

  • May 22, 2020
  • Russia and Turkey double down in Libya
  • What to make of No 10's Brexit briefings
  • January 15, 2020
  • Philippe's not-so-generous compromise offer
  • What is Erdogan up to in Libya?
  • When it is noise and not a signal
  • September 11, 2019
  • What are the chances of a deal?
  • May 09, 2019
  • The EU's impossible dilemma
  • The horsetrading starts in Sibiu
  • May to bring withdrawal bill to Commons week after next
  • January 04, 2019
  • Will the AfD become the Dexit party?
  • Romania's corruption problem in the spotlight of its EU presidency
  • August 24, 2018
  • Towards a standoff between Italy and the EU
  • A short note on the diminishing role of economists in political life
  • April 23, 2018
  • More bad news for the SPD
  • Will Theresa May accept a customs union? The Times says yes. We think so too.
  • A comeback for Marine Le Pen?
  • December 20, 2017
  • Down with the gown
  • How to overcome the political gridlock in Italy
  • Varoufakis is suing the ECB
  • August 21, 2017
  • Soft, getting softer
  • Tsipras' chances of a boost
  • On the fallacy of a middle-ground option for the eurozone
  • April 12, 2017
  • Macro in a state of denial
  • Where Schulz is vulnerable
  • Schäuble’s three party tricks
  • December 15, 2016
  • Scared of its own electorate
  • Towards a transitional deal
  • The comeback of Gerhard Schröder as the SPD's powerbroker
  • August 19, 2016
  • Brexit realities slowly dawning on the City
  • Opening shot for Hollande's campaign
  • April 25, 2016
  • The death of the Grand Coalition
  • Insurrection against TTIP
  • Juppé to benefit from Macron hype
  • On optimal currency areas
  • Why the Artic region could be the next geopolitical troublespot
  • From a currency to a people
  • July 06, 2020
  • Did Covid-19 escape from a Wuhan lab?
  • What to make of Angela Merkel's U-turn
  • June 17, 2020
  • Dijon violence and the politics of law and order
  • A Franco-German divide on holding Turkey accountable over Libya
  • June 01, 2020
  • Refugees' mass eviction in Greece
  • This is Brexit week again
  • May 18, 2020
  • Why this won't be a symmetric shock
  • Towards a new cold war
  • May 04, 2020
  • What is and isn't true about the Wuhan lab conspiracies
  • Towards a new government in Ireland
  • April 21, 2020
  • Lockdown as burden and opportunity
  • April 10, 2020
  • Italy has folded for the sake of a deal. Plus ca change.
  • ECB governors agreed on size of bond purchases, less on composition
  • France triples its fiscal stimulus
  • Direct lending to governments, big and small
  • Some bad Covid-19 news from Germany
  • March 30, 2020
  • Decision making under radical uncertainty
  • March 19, 2020
  • A useful step - but much, much more is needed
  • The good that can come out of this
  • March 09, 2020
  • Lockdown measures are not working
  • Will the ceasefire hold in Idlib?
  • March 02, 2020
  • What the return of the refugee crisis tells us about the EU
  • Does the UK really want a deal? Does France?
  • February 24, 2020
  • Coronavirus comes to Europe
  • Municipal elections - a precursor for Le Pen?
  • Germany and France get involved over Idlib
  • February 17, 2020
  • Security issues we should be discussing
  • Salvini has changed his mind on the euro - yet again
  • February 10, 2020
  • A new era in Irish politics with Sinn Féin
  • More fish, please
  • February 05, 2020
  • Russia and Turkey on collision course
  • Politics of rupture - Ireland edition
  • What drives Italian parties to support or reject early elections
  • February 02, 2020
  • Is Sinn Fein the Irish anti-establishment vote?
  • Don’t assume that nobody will follow the Brits
  • January 31, 2020
  • After Brexit EU urgently needs to address core vs non-core separation
  • How Brexit will change the UK’s economic strategy
  • Irish brace for tough trade talks and challenges to EU cohesion
  • The Franco-German relationship after Brexit
  • Preparedness may make Brexit a financial non-event
  • Still no clarity on airline rights post-Brexit
  • Brexit inspires the return of Parthenon Marbles to Athens
  • Gilbraltar holds pitfalls for the post-Brexit negotiations
  • January 30, 2020
  • Trade union politics on balancing France's pension fund
  • Johnson ready to let go of frictionless trade