We use cookies to help improve and maintain our site. More information.
close

April 28, 2020

A 2020 version of a Marshall plan - really?

In troubled times like these everyone calls for their own Marshall plan. Ursula von der Leyen suggested one for Europe, and Thierry Breton one for the tourism industry. There is also talk of a Marshall plan for African countries. French health care workers want a Marshall plan for health, others evoke one for vocational training, rail freight, SMEs, maritime transport, culture, air or sports. 

The Marshall plan is the new buzzword that raises hopes for the time after the lockdown, a deus ex machina of public action, as Jean-Marc Vittori puts it. But a closer look to the history suggests that today's situation is not at all comparable with the aftermath of WWII, and that the Marshall plan had its own strings attached. 

Back then the US invested to rebuild a European economy in ruins, sending about 5% of its GDP over four years, to be spent on European investment via the OECD's predecessor. Of it 90% were grants and 10% loans. The money helped the US too. Europeans bought more American products, they agreed to balance their current accounts and liberalise trade. They also agreed to adapt US standards of statistical reporting, and accepted technical assistance at firm level with an emphasis on productivity. 

Imagine a similar intervention today. We are talking about the equivalent of €1tr dispatched to fundamentally change the makeup of our economies. Vittori translates the 2020 version of the Marshall plan into one where Beijing proposed to Europe a mix of loans and grants to speed up mass telephony 5G, provided Europe purchases Huawei equipment and adopts Chinese technical standards. Such a proposal would be a non-starter.  

Also, compared to the aftermath of WWII, our economies are not in ruins. Structures and markets are still in place, finance is still flowing. We are facing a restructuring of our economies, though. Supply chains have been severed and demand has concentrated on essentials during lockdown. How and when both demand and supply recover after the lockdown will determine the rate of defaults and savings we will witness. This is where public action will define its role. And it is not coming from outside Europe. 

Show Comments Write a Comment

April 28, 2020

Where the EU converges and diverges

Belgium’s central bank has done a huge study on income convergence and divergence in the EU. It finds, unsurprisingly, that convergence in the early years of European integration has given rise to divergence between member states later on. What is surprising is the rise in regional divergence.

Within the EU, convergence was strongest during high growth periods and among the original member states. The authors claim to have discovered tentative signs of renewed convergence just before the Covid lockdown. We presume that all this is now out of the window, and that we are heading for a new period of intensified divergence as the crisis is likely to have strong and asymmetric economic effects.

The finding that surprised us the most is that intra-country disparities have increased since 1996. During that period, metropolitan areas have grown faster, which the authors put down to agglomeration effects. The effect was particularly pronounced for Belgium, with Flanders pulling ahead of the EU average, Brussels falling below the EU average, and Wallonia also falling behind. 

Show Comments Write a Comment

This is the public section of the Eurointelligence Professional Briefing, which focuses on the geopolitical aspects of our news coverage. It appears daily at 2pm CET. The full briefing, which appears at 9am CET, is only available to subscribers. Please click here for a free trial, and here for the Eurointelligence home page.

 

Recent News

  • June 24, 2020
  • How not to fob off Karlsruhe
  • June 15, 2020
  • US and Germany step up fight over NordStream 2
  • Macron's agenda for the next two years
  • June 04, 2020
  • No-deal preparations start for real
  • How to respond to Turkish provocations in the Mediterranean?
  • May 27, 2020
  • On the dangers of wishful thinking
  • Spain to introduce basic income
  • The temptation of easy money
  • May 20, 2020
  • Car purchase premiums - a way to save the car industry?
  • Centralised lockdown, decentralised exit
  • May 15, 2020
  • Brace for east-west tensions
  • Why European sovereignty is a counter-productive concept
  • May 10, 2020
  • On court rulings and folk economics
  • EU regions - some far better on Covid-19 but not on downturn
  • May 04, 2020
  • What is and isn't true about the Wuhan lab conspiracies
  • Towards a new government in Ireland
  • May 01, 2020
  • Germany bans Hezbollah - a likely precedent for the EU
  • As we mourn lives lost, what about lives saved?
  • April 29, 2020
  • Will the first be the last? Virus edition
  • Don't hurry your exit strategy