We use cookies to help improve and maintain our site. More information.

May 18, 2020

Why this won't be a symmetric shock

The first Covid-19 outbreak seems to be subsiding, but the epidemic is far from running its course. Regardless of government-enforced containment, individuals and firms are likely to change their behaviour to reduce contagion risk. And this will have implications for economic activity. Some economic sectors such as tourism or retail will be affected more strongly and for longer. And this will have an impact on employment. Not every country or region in Europe is equally exposed to these developments. A short paper in the latest BIS bulletin concludes that the unemployment risk from Covid-19, by region in the EU, is highest in France and the Mediterranean countries, lowest in northern Europe, and intermediate in eastern Europe. 

Sebastian Doerr and Leonardo Gambacorta use two factors to estimate their employment risk index: the first category includes exposure to trade, transportation, food, leisure, and household work; the second is the share of firms under 10 employees. Neither correlate well with their indicator variable of google searches for unemployment, but the combination of the two does. Having fewer small firms seems to protect countries like Germany and especially the UK in this case.

It is interesting to compare the estimated risk with the severity of the current outbreak. Italy, Spain, and the UK have had bad outbreaks and are estimated to be highly exposed on the basis of economic sectors, whereas France has been hit by the epidemic but isn't so exposed on the basis of economic activity. France is economically vulnerable because of its high share of small firms. Generally speaking, though, the economic sector factor seems to correlate with vulnerability to outbreaks. It looks like this crisis won't end up being a symmetric shock after all.

Show Comments Write a Comment

May 18, 2020

Towards a new cold war

The pandemic could have been a moment to reunite former enemies to combat the virus. Dominique Moïsi regrets in Les Échos that, instead, it has accelerated geopolitical divisions and given rise to a new cold war between China and the US. Europe is caught in the middle. 

After its initial silence about the virus spread and faced with the incoherent American response, China chose to attack as the best way to defend itself. Rolling out propaganda on all levels, sending masks and medical support to the world, and at the same time taking a tough diplomatic stance against the west, its strategy is reminiscent of foreign policy under Mao. China has chosen provocation and arrogance to mask a deep worry about their economy in the aftermath of the pandemic. Will their model of an authoritarian political system combined with a capitalist economy still work in times of economic weakness and mass unemployment?

The US is doubling down, too. Donald Trump is going into an general election campaign with his threat to cut off the relationship with China. To portray the virus as something that comes from outside the US conveniently deviates attention away from his own failures. 

And where is Europe in all this? Now that the main protagonists have been cast, Europe will be the object rather than subject in this new cold-war standoff. The declared aim of the Chinese authorities is to split the US and the Europeans, as well as the Europeans among themselves. The US wants to keep Europe in its camp, but won't do anything for it. Europe will be tempted not to choose. The choices are an America under Trump which no longer embodies the values of the old transatlantic Alliance, and a China that no longer hides its intentions. Expect tensions also among European countries which will loom over internal debates about 5G, or about China's strategic investments in eastern and southern European countries under its belt-and-road initiative.

Show Comments Write a Comment

This is the public section of the Eurointelligence Professional Briefing, which focuses on the geopolitical aspects of our news coverage. It appears daily at 2pm CET. The full briefing, which appears at 9am CET, is only available to subscribers. Please click here for a free trial, and here for the Eurointelligence home page.


Recent News

  • May 12, 2020
  • Brexit decision is slowly approaching
  • EU will remain closed for a while yet
  • January 06, 2020
  • A decade that started with a bang
  • What to expect of Spain's next government
  • Divide et impera: Macron's pension reform strategy
  • August 27, 2019
  • Remain’s narrowing pathway
  • Macron's diplomatic masterstroke
  • April 24, 2019
  • May's final and biggest gamble
  • Will the EP be Brexit's great parliamentary beneficiary?
  • Can Loiseau fight the far right given her past?
  • December 21, 2018
  • Not just Brexit makes 2019 a year of EU uncertainty
  • Sentiment is fickle, especially about sentiment
  • Father Christmas - French edition
  • King suspends Michel's resignation
  • EP has objections to the withdrawal treaty
  • Let's break the law
  • August 20, 2018
  • ... and a subtle shift in EU policies towards both Russia and Turkey
  • Nothing to celebrate about the end of the bailout programme
  • Support for Brexit holding up
  • April 19, 2018
  • Greece fears escalation after Erdogan calls snap polls
  • Towards repeat elections in the Czech Republic?
  • Lords defeat UK government on customs union - but it’s not what it seems
  • December 19, 2017
  • German pre-coalition talks to conclude mid-January
  • Shall we talk about Brexit?
  • August 21, 2017
  • Soft, getting softer
  • Tsipras' chances of a boost
  • On the fallacy of a middle-ground option for the eurozone
  • April 10, 2017
  • Nein, nein, nein, und nein
  • Sounds like a bad Brexit story, but ain’t
  • On how not to exit the euro
  • December 12, 2016
  • Renzi without Renzi
  • Shall we compensate the losers of globalisation?
  • The need for a partnership with China
  • August 18, 2016
  • Watch out for a return of the Ukraine crisis
  • Moody's is relatively optimistic on the UK
  • April 25, 2016
  • The death of the Grand Coalition
  • Insurrection against TTIP
  • Juppé to benefit from Macron hype
  • On optimal currency areas
  • Why the Artic region could be the next geopolitical troublespot
  • From a currency to a people
  • September 15, 2020
  • Towards an EU-run refugee camp
  • September 01, 2020
  • What just happened in front of the Reichstag?
  • When revolutions fail
  • August 17, 2020
  • How Putin could divide the EU over Belarus
  • The impossible mission of forming a federal government in Belgium
  • July 20, 2020
  • What will happen on January 1
  • July 10, 2020
  • On Germany's eagerness to please Beijing
  • July 01, 2020
  • Macron's executive - obstacle or enforcer?
  • New low in transatlantic relations
  • June 22, 2020
  • What we learned from Trump in Tulsa
  • Greece seeks EEZ deal with Egypt to counter Turkey
  • Political pressure on French judiciary in Fillon probe?
  • June 15, 2020
  • US and Germany step up fight over NordStream 2
  • Macron's agenda for the next two years
  • June 08, 2020
  • Brexit talks at an impasse
  • Trump's troop reduction in Germany - another way to divide the EU?
  • June 01, 2020
  • Refugees' mass eviction in Greece
  • This is Brexit week again
  • May 26, 2020
  • French fashion stores - lockdown is one crisis too many
  • An important German supreme court ruling against VW
  • Public scrutiny over lockdown rules
  • May 22, 2020
  • Russia and Turkey double down in Libya
  • What to make of No 10's Brexit briefings
  • May 20, 2020
  • Car purchase premiums - a way to save the car industry?
  • Centralised lockdown, decentralised exit
  • May 19, 2020
  • Beware of China's rising influence