We use cookies to help improve and maintain our site. More information.
close

March 12, 2019

US threatens withdrawal of security co-operation with Germany

This is going to be a decisive year for the future of US-European relations. In a worst-case scenario we end up with punitive tariffs on German cars, first steps to a US withdrawal from Nato, and sanctions against European companies that trade with Iran, Russia and China. A more immediate threat, as revealed by the Wall Street Journal yesterday, relates to Huawei's bid to equip Germany's 5G networks. The US is threatening to reduce German access to classified security information. The US administration issued the threat in the form of a letter presented last Friday by Richard Grenell, US ambassador in Berlin, to Peter Altmaier, German economics minister.

The US argument is that 5G systems are much more software-reliant than previous generations of telecommunications networks. Even if Huawei were to deliver an initially secure system, constant software updates would make it possible for Huawei to include backdoors for the Chinese security services. The complexity of the software makes it impossible to control, the US side argues. The US threat is not to cut Germany completely off from all security channels - that would be against the US' own interests - but to reduce the flow and the transparency of the information. If Germany were to allow Huawei to build its 5G network, US security agencies would work on the assumption that any information they transmit would end up in China. 

The Wall Street Journal writes that even this modulated threat would deeply upset the German security community, which is heavily dependent on the CIA, the National Security Agency and other US intelligence agencies for Germany's own security. 

The big question is: how will Germany respond to this threat? There are no easy choices. Germany does not have sufficient independent intelligence capacity, so it is vulnerable. But Germany is also dependent on Huawei's telecommunications technology. The 5G auction offered a unique opportunity for Germany to modernise its patchy mobile telecoms infrastructure. Without Huawei, these efforts would be set back by a further two years because much of the existing 4G infrastructure is based on Huawei technology - and 4G and 5G systems are not compatible across suppliers.

To ward off a potential US threat Germany has tried to introduce a strict security protocol that includes the vetting of Huawei personnel operating the network. The negotiations for a Chinese-German no-spying agreement, which we recently covered, served the purpose to make it possible for Huawei to bid in the German 5G auction which scheduled to start this month. If Germany were to yield to US pressure, it would not only suffer an industrial setback but might become more vulnerable to further US blackmail attempts, including threats against firms participating in the NordStream 2 gas pipeline consortium.

Show Comments Write a Comment

March 12, 2019

AKK goes for politics, not policy

Annegret Kramp-Karrenbauer did not have to wait long for an answer from Paris. Non, said Europe minister Nathalie Loiseau to much applause during a speech in the Assemblée Nationale. France would not hand over its Security Council seat to the EU and non, France would not give up its treaty-based right to host the seat of the European Parliament in Strasbourg. For good measure, the speech extract was shared on twitter - a clear measure of the deep irritation felt in Paris across the political spectrum that AKK had used her first significant European policy contribution, framed as an answer to Emmanuel Macron’s own op-ed, to formulate what are seen in Paris as politically highly unrealistic demands. No French president could afford to give up on Strasbourg as an EP seat without massive political damage. And the UN Charter states that only states can sit on the Security Council – making AKK’s proposal, leaving French interests aside, entirely gratuitous unless it comes with a proposal to endow the EU with the legal quality of statehood.

So what on earth was the intent between AKK’s provocations? The answer, we suspect, is politics not policy. AKK’s vapid and contradictory op-ed begins to make sense when read as a paper drafted to say something - almost anything - on Europe while flattering the instincts of a broad spectrum the CDU base. It fits with AKK’s recent dubious carnival joke about special loos for transsexuals. The party leader is currently far less interested in policy than in the politics of ensuring a good enough showing for her party in the upcoming series of German regional elections.

Show Comments Write a Comment

This is the public section of the Eurointelligence Professional Briefing, which focuses on the geopolitical aspects of our news coverage. It appears daily at 2pm CET. The full briefing, which appears at 9am CET, is only available to subscribers. Please click here for a free trial, and here for the Eurointelligence home page.

 

Recent News

  • March 18, 2019
  • May's deal still on the table. Don't rule it out.
  • EPP decision on Fidesz still open
  • On the defeat of liberalism
  • March 15, 2019
  • The rising significance of the European elections for Brexit
  • Orbán apologises, but only for channeling Lenin
  • Who is afraid of Marine Le Pen?
  • March 13, 2019
  • Not really all that meaningful
  • Will the EPP merely put Orban on probation?
  • Why AKKs riposte to Macron is deeply disturbing