We use cookies to help improve and maintain our site. More information.

August 08, 2019

A poll on October 31?

We noted a comment from Sebastian Payne in the FT, according to which the strategists inside Number 10 are mulling the possibility of an election on October 31, which is a Thursday, or November 1. We were amused to read a tweet claiming this date would be the sweet spot: Boris Johnson would have pushed us over the cliff but we would not have landed yet.

The trouble with elections a week or two weeks later is the uncertainty caused by severe disruptions from a no-deal Brexit. We have no idea how disruptive it will be. The government’s own intelligence seems to be that the process is manageable, but still disruptive. So it would make sense to pick an election day after Brexit has happened, but before the disruption sets in. If elections were held on October 31, the winner would not be installed until November 1 at the earliest. So, even if the Tories were to lose the election, the new prime minister would not be able to reverse Brexit. We think that this might even suit Jeremy Corbyn, who does not want to fight a Brexit election either.

The main news development yesterday was Labour's insistence that they would only countenance a government of national unity if led by Corbyn. To that end, shadow chancellor John McDonnell is enlisting the help of the SNP. In turn, he promised to support what the SNP wants the most - a second Scottish referendum. The LibDems categorically ruled out supporting a Corbyn-led minority government. So unless something shifts, the idea is dead in the water. 

The increasingly desperate MPs who spend their whole lives plotting how to stop a no-deal Brexit are now considering other parliamentary strategies - to force a delay in the parliamentary schedule of the early autumn break. The idea is to give time for legislation to draw up a new request for an extension. We have argued before that such legislation is futile for a number of reasons, if only because it does not bind the European Council. That process would meet serious practical, legal and political obstacles. 

And finally, as an aside, we see the old revolutionary Marxist coming out in McDonnell. He said yesterday: if Boris Johnson were to lose a vote of no-confidence, he would personally send Jeremy Corbyn to Buckingham Palace "in a taxi". Upon which Corbyn would demand that the Queen appoint him prime minister. The Tories are screaming coup d’etat. Will they send tanks to protect the Queen from Corbyn?

This story is telling us two things: the British have not entirely lost their sense of humour; and they are confused about their constitution. For us the situation is clear because we have read the Fixed Terms Parliaments Act. It overrides all the previous constitutional gunk, by setting out a clear procedure of what happens when a prime minister loses a vote of no-confidence. The FTPA is as clear as Article 50, and yet not much read and not much understood. Our advice is to trust the lawyers on this: under the UK’s constitutional law, as it is today, it is not possible to stop a no-deal Brexit through procedures outlined in the FTPA, except in case an alternative prime minister commands a parliamentary majority. It is as simple as that. 

Show Comments Write a Comment

This is the public section of the Eurointelligence Professional Briefing, which focuses on the geopolitical aspects of our news coverage. It appears daily at 2pm CET. The full briefing, which appears at 9am CET, is only available to subscribers. Please click here for a free trial, and here for the Eurointelligence home page.


Recent News

  • April 20, 2017
  • Don’t bet on Trump turning globalist
  • A note on UK election polls
  • December 20, 2016
  • The politics of terror
  • On Lagarde
  • Is a disruptive Brexit possible?
  • August 22, 2016
  • Gold for Brexit
  • EU and Turkey talking past each other
  • Switzerland is the next migrant transit country
  • On the death of neoliberal economics
  • April 25, 2016
  • The death of the Grand Coalition
  • Insurrection against TTIP
  • Juppé to benefit from Macron hype
  • On optimal currency areas
  • Why the Artic region could be the next geopolitical troublespot
  • From a currency to a people
  • November 25, 2019
  • Twenty years on - and less safe than ever
  • Philippe's last round of talks ahead of strike actions
  • November 11, 2019
  • Grand coalition agrees to continue grand coalition
  • Can Greens and conservatives agree on priorities?
  • Germany - self-content and without energy
  • October 29, 2019
  • People's Vote descends into Civil War
  • CDU at odds on dealing with extreme parties
  • October 18, 2019
  • The horrifying implications of Merkel’s 5G decision
  • October 09, 2019
  • A final push for a deal
  • Costa mandated to form government
  • September 30, 2019
  • A pyrrhic victory for Kurz
  • Will there really be UK elections?
  • September 23, 2019
  • Corbyn’s last big battle
  • Germany’s CO2 compromise meets all targets - except the climate targets
  • September 17, 2019
  • Beware of the diplomacy of humiliation
  • Germany’s climate hypocrisy
  • September 09, 2019
  • Chances of no-deal are rising and rising
  • Resist the beginnings
  • September 02, 2019
  • Prorogation already served its purpose - events will come to a head this week
  • EU citizens in the UK are the biggest victims of no-deal Brexit
  • August 30, 2019
  • The gloves are off - let the Brexit massacre begin
  • Will Five Star's Members torpedo the coalition?
  • August 27, 2019
  • Remain’s narrowing pathway
  • Macron's diplomatic masterstroke
  • August 09, 2019
  • Salvini pulls the plug
  • Could a no-deal Brexit fuel unification for Ireland?
  • The challenge currency war poses to the eurozone
  • Black zero in dark times
  • The need for a new EU industrial and competition policy
  • Mitsotakis' first tests
  • Eurozone financial data