We use cookies to help improve and maintain our site. More information.
close

March 16, 2020

Why many of the Covid-19 statistics are misleading

We are no virologists, but successive financial crises have taught us how to think about genuine uncertainty. They taught us especially not to be over-reliant on easily-available statistics. When you are dealing with catastrophic risks whose probability is fundamentally incalculable, it is best to acknowledge the existence of genuine uncertainty - one that is not calculable. Economists will know the notion of Knightian uncertainty, a useful concept that distinguishes between risk and uncertainty. 

When we heard about the impact of the virus in Wuhan in January, we argued that the EU should stop flights from China and close the Schengen border. We had no information about the spread of the virus, but thought it would have been a comparatively cheap insurance policy. When the cases in Italy started to rise, the EU missed another opportunity to shut the Schengen borders. This would have been an easily available lock-down measure because the infrastructure already exists. 

On this point we think that some of the experts miscalculated. They estimated that border closures would have only bought a day. But that calculation ignores the importance of statistical outliers. The average rate of spread, as measured by the R-zero statistic, tells us nothing about super-spreaders. If only a single super-spreader could have been prevented from entering the EU, the situation in some of the hotspots in northern Italy would have been very different. 

Over the last few days the EU has moved from complacency to panic. The partial border closures that are now being introduced are still useful in our view, but less so than they would have been two months ago. The experiences from Singapore, Korea and Japan are telling us that early lock-down measures work.

Statistics can mislead us in many ways. Another example are emergency beds in hospitals. Again, it is not the average that matters. Italy has more emergency beds than France. The problem is that the hot spots of Lombardy and Emilia-Romagna cannot cope. Even the much better-equipped German system would not have been able to cope with what happened in Bergamo. The average number of hospital beds per 100,000 people is meaningless. What counts is the number of beds in your area, in every area. 

And finally, also be careful about worst-case scenarios like those that are making the rounds in the UK papers. An infection rate of 80% is extremely unlikely. We do not know the true mortality rate because the number of infected people outnumbers reported cases by a factor 10 or 20, possibly higher. The higher that number, the lower the mortality rate. So don’t combine the worst-case scenario for the spread of the virus with the worst-case scenario for the mortality rate.

Show Comments Write a Comment

This is the public section of the Eurointelligence Professional Briefing, which focuses on the geopolitical aspects of our news coverage. It appears daily at 2pm CET. The full briefing, which appears at 9am CET, is only available to subscribers. Please click here for a free trial, and here for the Eurointelligence home page.

 

Recent News

  • September 01, 2020
  • What just happened in front of the Reichstag?
  • When revolutions fail
  • March 03, 2020
  • On the unintended consequences of GDPR
  • September 05, 2019
  • Would Keynes be in favour of Brexit?
  • March 11, 2019
  • Ask what Europe can do for Germany - AKK's EU manifesto
  • September 14, 2018
  • Carney warns about dramatic hard Brexit impact on housing market
  • Can Africa thrive on free trade with Europe?
  • March 21, 2018
  • The political pathway to a Brexit revocation is closing
  • September 26, 2017
  • Brexit is a binary choice between EEA or third-country status
  • April 05, 2017
  • What if Macron were to become president?
  • The case for relative optimism about Article 50
  • October 14, 2016
  • Tusk's awkward choice
  • Seven candidates, three debates
  • April 25, 2016
  • The death of the Grand Coalition
  • Insurrection against TTIP
  • Juppé to benefit from Macron hype
  • On optimal currency areas
  • Why the Artic region could be the next geopolitical troublespot
  • From a currency to a people
  • May 22, 2020
  • Russia and Turkey double down in Libya
  • What to make of No 10's Brexit briefings
  • January 15, 2020
  • Philippe's not-so-generous compromise offer
  • What is Erdogan up to in Libya?
  • When it is noise and not a signal
  • September 11, 2019
  • What are the chances of a deal?
  • May 09, 2019
  • The EU's impossible dilemma
  • The horsetrading starts in Sibiu
  • May to bring withdrawal bill to Commons week after next
  • January 04, 2019
  • Will the AfD become the Dexit party?
  • Romania's corruption problem in the spotlight of its EU presidency
  • August 24, 2018
  • Towards a standoff between Italy and the EU
  • A short note on the diminishing role of economists in political life
  • April 23, 2018
  • More bad news for the SPD
  • Will Theresa May accept a customs union? The Times says yes. We think so too.
  • A comeback for Marine Le Pen?
  • December 20, 2017
  • Down with the gown
  • How to overcome the political gridlock in Italy
  • Varoufakis is suing the ECB
  • August 21, 2017
  • Soft, getting softer
  • Tsipras' chances of a boost
  • On the fallacy of a middle-ground option for the eurozone
  • April 12, 2017
  • Macro in a state of denial
  • Where Schulz is vulnerable
  • Schäuble’s three party tricks
  • December 15, 2016
  • Scared of its own electorate
  • Towards a transitional deal
  • The comeback of Gerhard Schröder as the SPD's powerbroker
  • August 19, 2016
  • Brexit realities slowly dawning on the City
  • Opening shot for Hollande's campaign
  • April 25, 2016
  • The death of the Grand Coalition
  • Insurrection against TTIP
  • Juppé to benefit from Macron hype
  • On optimal currency areas
  • Why the Artic region could be the next geopolitical troublespot
  • From a currency to a people
  • September 23, 2020
  • SPD has not benefitted from Scholz' candidacy
  • September 04, 2020
  • What to make of the Nordstream 2 discussion in Germany?
  • Nato steps in to mediate between Turkey and Greece
  • August 17, 2020
  • How Putin could divide the EU over Belarus
  • The impossible mission of forming a federal government in Belgium
  • July 30, 2020
  • Labour still miles away from where it needs to be
  • July 14, 2020
  • Why the far-right might win in the end
  • June 29, 2020
  • Édouard Philippe - mayor or prime minister?
  • Sir Humphrey, R.I.P.
  • June 15, 2020
  • US and Germany step up fight over NordStream 2
  • Macron's agenda for the next two years
  • June 01, 2020
  • Refugees' mass eviction in Greece
  • This is Brexit week again
  • May 21, 2020
  • How to spend it - recovery fund edition
  • Greek stimulus to help tourism sector
  • Teleworking is catching on
  • May 10, 2020
  • On court rulings and folk economics
  • EU regions - some far better on Covid-19 but not on downturn
  • May 01, 2020
  • Germany bans Hezbollah - a likely precedent for the EU
  • As we mourn lives lost, what about lives saved?
  • April 22, 2020
  • Can we afford a second lockdown?
  • EU to help hardest-hit tourism sector
  • April 15, 2020
  • Italy’s coalition disagrees about the ESM
  • April 06, 2020
  • The feedback loop of Covid-19 and inequalities - part 10 of our series
  • How confinement affects mental health
  • March 31, 2020
  • Orbán's power grab
  • Why we would like to share the optimism on eurobonds, but can’t.
  • March 26, 2020
  • Testing and tracking - a recipe for Europe?
  • Diplomacy and the Wuhan virus
  • March 23, 2020
  • Orbán seeks to extend his powers
  • UK as the double counterfactual
  • March 19, 2020
  • A useful step - but much, much more is needed
  • The good that can come out of this
  • March 17, 2020
  • The old crisis narratives are returning to Germany
  • Return of the war against
  • March 16, 2020
  • Why many of the Covid-19 statistics are misleading