We use cookies to help improve and maintain our site. More information.
close

June 23, 2020

EU-China relations - another Waiting for Godot moment

The EU raised its voice towards China during a six-hour video conference between the two top EU officials and China's premier and president. The EU was more combative and assertive about what it expects from its trading partner. Europe is settling for talks to settle differences, instead of taking a confrontational course like the US. Yet past experiences with China showed that there is hardly any follow-up on talks without some sanctioning power behind them. Will it be different this time?

There has been momentum in Europe to increase its protective shield against a more aggressive China, with a 5G directive, a new regulation on screening of foreign investment, measures to monitor opportunistic purchases into European companies, the recent white paper on foreign state subsidies, and the letter on misinformation, which named China in particular.

But, as China expert Francois Godement points out, the question is how effective all these new policies will be. Will they be binding for member states? Will the implementation of these policies be backed up by means, in particular human resources? Will there be an investment agreement between the EU and China? Maybe, but unlikely this year. The EU said that, to conclude the agreement, it wants to see more ambition from the Chinese side. But Europe itself is caught in the crossfire between the US and China. The upcoming presidential elections risk framing an EU move to compromise with China as unfriendly towards the US, and could be held against Europe. It may thus well be that both sides welcome the postponement of the EU/China summit planned for this October, due to Covid-19.

Will China change its negotiating stance? China is good at promising a compromise and more dialogue. But, in reality, these promises are usually not backed up by actions. 

Europe is so far waiting in vain for progress when it comes to lowering barriers to access to Chinese procurement markets. The EU and China may be both keen to keep the WHO alive, but China has so far not made any recommendations in this respect. The same goes for climate change. Europe may remind China of its role as one of the world's biggest economies, yet China's prime minister still lists carbon as one of China's main energy sources. 

It is not lack of unity within the EU that is to blame in this case. If anything, unity has been strengthened by the pandemic. But compared with the US, which has effective tools to frustrate Chinese investments that can be implemented with immediate effect, the EU seems toothless. From a Chinese perspective, it is Europe that does not have much else to offer than diplomatic language. Why should China be interested in an agreement that would require them to open up, offering more reciprocity and access by European companies to its procurement markets? The truth is that Europe has no clear and firm strategy towards China, writes Godement. The EU's frank talk about human-rights violations or China's disinformation campaigns is a first step to confront China with its responsibilities. But more needs to be done for this to become effective. 

Show Comments Write a Comment

June 23, 2020

Troop movements on the German-Polish border

We couldn't quite resist this headline, but it looks that a relocation of 9500 US troops from Germany to Poland is imminent. Justyna Gotkowska quotes Polish media with the following details:

  • a new contingent of US troops, some from Germany and some from the US;
  • a relocation of 30 F-16 US fighter planes from Germany to Poland;
  • the headquarters of the V corps of the US army to be moved from Fort Knox to Poland;
  • adding 5 C-130 Hercules military transport aircraft, not clear whether this is a purchase or a relocation;
  • a deal on attack helicopters;
  • a bilateral defence co-operation act between the US and Poland.

Robert O’Brien, the White House national security adviser, gave further details in an article in the Wall Street Journal. The number of US troops in Germany will be cut from 34,500 to 25,000. Donald Trump already decided this on June 15, but the formal public announcement is yet to come. The joint chiefs of staff are working on the implementation.

O'Brien tries to straddle two separate arguments. One is technical. We are not interested in those because we don't believe them. This is first and foremost political. He confirmed that this is not just a one-to-one swap. Some US troops in Germany will be redeployed to bases in Asia and Australia. This is where the main geopolitical challenges for the US lie.

Like Trump in his Tulsa speech, O'Brien admits openly that this decision is linked to Germany's failure to meet the promise of raising defence spending to 2% of GDP by 2024, which is a Nato commitment. He writes that Germany is the world's fourth largest economy, yet spends only 1.4% of its GDP on defence. Some Nato members, like Poland, have kept to the 2% promise. He writes that Berlin still has time to step up and show leadership, as he puts it. As observers of German politics, we can state categorically that this won't happen.

Like Trump, O'Brien also makes a link to the Nord Stream 2 pipeline project, and to Berlin's choice of 5G telecoms provider. If this goes to Huawei, as we expect it might, the relationship with the US is set to deteriorate further.

Show Comments Write a Comment

This is the public section of the Eurointelligence Professional Briefing, which focuses on the geopolitical aspects of our news coverage. It appears daily at 2pm CET. The full briefing, which appears at 9am CET, is only available to subscribers. Please click here for a free trial, and here for the Eurointelligence home page.

 

Recent News

  • September 07, 2020
  • The far right is gaining ground in the Netherlands
  • Is there an exit to the conflict with Turkey?
  • August 26, 2020
  • Maas' mission for dialogue between Turkey and Greece
  • Universal basic income - now subject to a vaccine-style test
  • August 17, 2020
  • How Putin could divide the EU over Belarus
  • The impossible mission of forming a federal government in Belgium
  • July 29, 2020
  • Le Pen's summer contribution
  • Turkey's games with the EU
  • July 21, 2020
  • A deal, but at what cost?
  • July 14, 2020
  • Why the far-right might win in the end
  • July 07, 2020
  • Europe on brink of serious conflict with China
  • Erdogan's Libya strategy gains support at home
  • July 02, 2020
  • How Italian politics could intrude
  • Saving Airbus jobs - a new Franco-German mission?
  • June 29, 2020
  • Édouard Philippe - mayor or prime minister?
  • Sir Humphrey, R.I.P.
  • June 25, 2020
  • Spain may reject German asylum-reform plan
  • What Scottish whiskey and Leica camera lenses have in common
  • June 24, 2020
  • How not to fob off Karlsruhe